Donald Trump (Gemini) and Sarah Palin (Aquarius) compatibility.
" This is a great match, and always worth pursuing if you get the opportunity! Even if things don't work out, you'll probably be very close friends for life. You can sometimes be unsure of what you want in a partner, and the great thing is, this usually suits your Aquarius just fine! They're so naturally dynamic that they will find your attitude inspiring rather than indecisive (unlike almost every other sign!) You're both likely to be very intelligent and great at communication, leading to an endless supply of fascinating and insightful conversations. You both prefer an objective debate over an emotional one, and you both like a quick-fire conversation style, often switching between subjects and back again rapidly (which again few other signs can handle or appreciate nearly as much) On the negative side, neither of you are particularly fond of chores and day to day trivial tasks. But then, when you're having this much fun with someone - who cares?! "
Without global self discipline and responsibility in procreation ?...means overpopulation and wars over a space to live. Some of the most brutal and persistent conflicts and full-out wars of the past decades, include the stresses of overpopulation and conflict over resources.
If you see yourself in a dream as someone else and especially when you see your death or an event that strongly influences you present live, for example being stepped with a knife and you have also unexplained fear of knifes in this life – especially if it just one kind of them – it indicates that you are viewing your past life/death. Seeing yourself as someone else and knowing it is you, fear of death by specific weapon/tool/way, strong feelings of sadness, dislikes, regrets or attachment to someone from that dream are the sights that you are viewing your past life.
There is a pointlessness in asking these questions because you can't filter vanity from your responses. You're relying upon self-reporting, and not even anonymous self-reporting at that, from the most image-conscious people of them all.
Sounds to me like.......
You can prove that X is true, or at least that X is in the majority, yet if there's any chance that X will tarnish an image or suggest that a woman is not wholly unique in what she does then you can guarantee that X will form the minority of publicly stated female opinion. Starting with any positive integer n, form a sequence in the following way:
If n is even, divide it by 2 to give n' = n/2. If n is odd, multiply it by 3 and add 1 to give n' = 3n + 1.
Then take n' as the new starting number and repeat the process. For example:
n = 5 gives the sequence 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... n = 11 gives the sequence 11, 34, 17, 52, 26, 13, 40, 20, 10, 5, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,...
These are sometimes called "Hailstone sequences" because they go up and down just like a hailstone in a cloud before crashing to Earth - the endless cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1. It seems from experiment that such a sequence will always eventually end in this repeating cycle 4, 2, 1, 4, 2, 1,... and so on, but some values for N generate many values before the repeating cycle begins.
Yes, allow.... and foreboding, apprehension, consternation, dismay, dread, terror, fright, panic, horror, trepidation, qualm. Plays a big part in that.
Only too often, after their initial infatuation wears off, men and women find that they have made a serious misjudgment. They wonder what happened to all those qualitites that each thought the other possessed. Even when two people go out together for years, spend countless evenings together, and come to know each other thoroughly, the effort often eventually seems to have been of no avail.
Inevitably, they discover that they did not understand each other's characters at all. Even if they are satisfied with their marriage, not once will they find that their partner is exactly as they had imagined him or her to be.
Common sense would argue that when people select mates entirely on their own and know each other for a relatively long period of time before marriage, the frequency of divorce should be lower than it was fifty or sixty years ago, when parents had a voice in choosing mates for their children. Precisely the opposite is true. Today's divorce rate is significantly higher than it was in the recent past.
The primary cause of today's failed marriages is people's inability to judge a prospective marriage partner with even a semblance of objectivity. Most men and women are unaware of the subconscious drives and inclinations, both good and bad, that pull them in many directions. They ignore the difficulty of perceiving things clearly in areas as volatile as love and human relations.
Once they feel attraction to another person, they rarely pause to consider whether this attraction is rooted in an objective appraisal of that person's qualities or in prejudice, a desire which projects virtues onto the person. With a fool's confidence, they let their captivated hearts lead them into marriages in which they are sure they will live happily ever after. Unfortunately, this is not often the case.
Wise people realize they cannot depend on their own judgment in matters that involve their emotions. At such times, they rely on others to tell them what is right and what is wrong. They know that if they do not ask others for help, they are likely to commit major errors.
This article is an excerpt from the book "Shidduchim and Zivugim" by Rabbi Yehudah Lebovits, printed by Targum/Feldheim Publishers.
I've noticed that European women are much more docile during the PMS trip, than American women. Is it because of societies influence on them ?...but European men are much more "old farty " than American men. Same reason ?
It's like women just can't resist trying to get closer to them. Is it because they think they can get the same, that the other woman had with him ? Or is it because they feel sorry for him ?
RE: What's your best quality you offer on a first date?
What you will see and hear, is what you will get in me. And I will expect exactly the same in her.