No I did not. you have just made it clear you do not understand the difference between “scientific theory” and “layman’s theory” they are two completely different things
If you want to know the truth which at this stage you we know you don’t see evolution which is a scientific theory considered to be scientific fact because it is backed up with conclusive evidence , but as already stated you don’t want the truth so stick your fingers in your ears and pretend a magical sky fairy made us after all you do have the bible to back you up , a book written by animal sacrificing primitives that thought every species on the planet lived within walking distance of Noah’s house
Define your question , that one is too vague
Who said we have a purpose ???
This has been explaind to you many times , one thing is clear we do not get our morals from the bible
What ever humanities destiny is it does not involve a sky fairy
Bull you just want to say "ooo look at them disagreeing with me they must be against poor little old me” this is nothing more than an exercise in your self justification
Ps for anyone interested this is a very common set of questions that are used by a number of christian groups who don’t see the flawed logic behind them ,You know mike at some point you may want to at least try thinking for your self
In the context of this thread you are implying that evolutionary theory is ever changing, it is not , there are many aspects of scientific understanding that have not changed in many years
the bible has never been a source of sicence. the Egyptians which year ??? when theories are proven wrong we call that scientific advancement there is nothing wrong with it , it’s what scientists live for .
And if said data disproved the age of the earth / evolution the scientific communities would abandon said theory’s over night . that’s the difference between real scientists and people that make up what they claim to be science to prop up their own beliefs
The point is I should not be put in a position where I have to choose.
Your trying to compare apples and oranges some one does not choose to get sick , you choose to smoke. When you smoke in public areas you are polluting the air forcing other’s to inhale the toxins.
I never said they where , I have the respect not to put words in your mouth please show the same courtesy
No it’s called requiring actual evidence that meets the burden of proof to back up a statement that contradicts the scientific community When trying to disprove what is considered scientific fact proper scientific methods must be used . I have been in enough of these threads to know that the likely out come is a quote from a source that has not been near a peir review.
There is a saying either put up or shut up ,if you any evidence to support you argument present it (Ps keep in mind only proper science will be excepted any thing else is open for ridicule)
crotalus_p Forum Posts (2,789)
, I have the respect not to put words in your mouth please show the same courtesy
RE: Utopia or Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure ?
No I did not. you have just made it clear you do not understand the difference between “scientific theory” and “layman’s theory” they are two completely different things