That's the real point of being the creditor for them imo, not to ever get paid back in money, but to continue to facilitate the transfer of everything that makes money from West to East.
Surpass our knowledge and technology and build their own Oxbridge, develop their own market to absorb Chinese production without relying on exports, dominate the far east and use the rest of the world(particularly Africa and South America)as a supply of raw materials.
That could be one of the power blocs in tomorrow's global power of three(or maybe four).
Education, knowledge and technology extraction are the fundamental reasons why China props up the West. Once they outstrip us by every measure my concern would be a China which walls itself off from the world, taking the brightest minds and the engine of the economy with it.
But what the hell was Jim Webb doing up there with his alpha male body language and his white worker, anti-orc views? Does he not know what the Democrats are these days?
2040 could be the year where the Whites, the Blacks, the Muslims and the Jews all live happily together side by side in Chinese concentration camps. That's a possibility more likely than an all-out civil war between every muslim and every non-muslim.
Eastern Germany/Europe ain't got no Baby Boomers. It never had this generation of pampered rabbits living it up on their ancestor's success at tomorrow's expense. The low numbers of entitled rabbits in Eastern Europe makes them highly-resistant to pathological altruism and an orc takeover.
That's the problem of not giving them enough space. There's an argument brewing within Islam and if we stand in the middle of that argument their beef is with us, when it is not, their primary beef is with each other and we're prolonging the beef.
This is why Israel prolongs the beef within Islam. It's an external focal point for them to hate collectively instead of taking a long hard look at themselves. Immigration is often the same for White people, and whilst immigration is a problem it is not the primary problem, and many white people simply blame immigrants for everything instead of taking a long, hard look at themselves. The same thing happens with the mythical "1%", they become the scapegoat so people don't have to self-reflect.
Back to the point of Islam the reformations of Europe were the same violent, bloody, and chaotic affairs and it took ages for them to pass. I see no reason why the reformation of the middle east and elsewhere would be any different.
All our beliefs and systems of governance are a tool and there is always an elite of greater or lesser beneficence(sometimes it's more maleficent than anything else). Anyway, over time we go from using ball-breaking crude instruments to more sophisticated and refined ones that achieve twice as much with half the mess.
The point you're missing is that she does not need to make the first move - she can easily find a man in her league without having to approach and oftentimes his making the first move is how she measures him up - but for a man the ability to make the first move is mandatory and he will suffer severe negative consequences by not doing so.
Nothing special to Islam. We were once not so different to how they are now. What they need is time and space and perhaps because we're used to things happening so quickly in the modern day we come to have no patience. Islam is barbarous, but this too shall pass.
There are factors such as Israel, the sea of black gold of the sheikhs - the Arab race(which I believe is a backward and aggressive race) - lengthening the lifetime of medieval Islam yet it is still coming apart at the seams. What is destined to die will die.
Women avoid risks and play the supporting role in the economy too. We've opened the playing field, but the game doesn't change. Human nature doesn't change. Wouldn't life be so much easier if we were attracted to frumpy low-maintenance women?
Two main reasons why people don't make(or refute)the connection.
Much of the middle class supports class warfare(Occupy)and they hold the assumption that the more the poor outnumber the rich in a society the stronger the position of the poor. When the opposite is the case. The fewer the workers the better it is for the workers. After the black death where the peasant population was decimated by the plague peasants enjoyed a standard of living as yet unseen.(the prosperity after WWII arose for somewhat similar reasons).
And then there's a strain of pathological altruism which assumes that money grows on trees and therefore you can help everyone. Such an ethic is born of a people disconnected to the point of autism from the means of their own survival and as such don't know the value of things.
These taken together have created a Left wing which in the name of progress sets the interests of every other nation before its own.
Crossing the two-week rubicon normally leads to talk of a different kind. Will I sit down and have a meal with her or go for a walk along the river, or will she take it up the pooper? That kind of stuff.
And we need to defeat the dangerous and ignorant liberal idea that minorities are all on the same side. Gays and Muslim hards are both minorities but what kind of deranged mind would put those two together? A liberal mind.
Maybe I make things sound too involved. We need some thugs around to show them what happens when they misbehave. The ones who don't respect liberals will respect violence.
I can consider the capital lost, however, the good thing about London is quality control and a more equal mix. London maybe cosmopolitan but there isn't one dominant invader nor the sense that the third world is waiting on the wings. As Disraeli said London is a roost for every bird.
Paris is a very different story. They've allowed in garbage, almost nothing but garbage, and there is the sense that the third world is about to takeover. I've been to Paris twice in the last few years and apart from the architecture it was terrible, nothing like how I remember it when I was 9.
Myself and many other guys my age have or would feel jealous of an old guy taking our women, but there are few women in their 20s who EVER feel jealous of middle-aged women.
The young babe the older man gets is normally a girl any man would want, but the young boy the cougar gets is normally a boy that no other girl wants. There's a massive difference here.
The branding of words is often deliberately misleading to disguise the reality. No one envies a cougar or her boy prey and so people feel much more neutral. Yet older men are jealous of older gents with young babes, and the old women are jealous of the young babes for stealing their men.
The "dirty old man" is actually quite cool, but a "cougar" is as cool as AIDS. The baddest sounding one is the coolest one.
Gun control will make the bourgeoisie safer. Most of these upper and lower middle class kids shooting up schools acquire their guns legally or from someone who got them legally.
Gun control for the urban working class, however, is murder. Gun crime amongst this segment of society is not normally conducted by someone in legal possession of a firearm. Gun control will disarm the working class but it will not disarm the untermenschen next door.
If fears were grounded and rational merit would overtake popularity on this issue. Being a knowitall would become a positive if people really felt under the kosh. The person with the ideas to fight Islam would not be shunned if the many felt that Muslims were actually a threat.
Islam does seem to be a purely abstract fear for most people. Something to talk about, but not to act against.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: China, in an all out war against the world.
That's the real point of being the creditor for them imo, not to ever get paid back in money, but to continue to facilitate the transfer of everything that makes money from West to East.