Not much. The welfare state and public sector getting poorer will help seen as 80% of women's wages come from these.
Anyway, we can either train women to choose more reliable types(fat chance)or we can train the more intelligent beta males to be more like what women are attracted to(if they don't resent you for trying). Oh and the "Husbands for old Maids" mentality of feminists must be buried forever.
There's little sense of duty to manhood, even less sense of duty in womanhood, a weak sense of duty to marriage and no shame in divorce. Are we surprised that marriages fail so often?
No, what(usually)keeps a relationship going these days is the fun. But fun is not in fact a good basis for a lasting marriage and it certainly does the kids no favours. Duty, thinking of others, maturity - all of these things should matter more at the expense of fun and thrills.
Failure is nothing to fear. People who fail are not the people who never win. The man who never wins is he who doesn't try, and for that he will always be the tragic one.
I don't think you need any advice or criticism, but what you need is to get out there and fail. And once you've failed you can come back and look at how you could have done better. There's no point in looking at your gameplan when you've never played the game. I wouldn't give you the same advice I'd give beta males when you've not even left omega territory.
Boring people easily bored. All entertainment is media now and nothing has to require much effort so maybe people have simply forgot how to be interesting and can no longer stand each other in anything more than small doses.
My parents would choose the one with the child-bearing hips. My mates would choose the one with the nice rack. My youngest sister would choose the one with the shiniest hair.
Between them I think they've just about cracked it.
The lot of the poor will be better in the future. Extreme poverty may become a thing of the past, toil may no longer be necessary but greed and jostling for status will be made worse because of all of our wealth. The poor won't starve and they will not freeze, but the shame of being poor will be worse in a society so divided and unequal where technology allows the wealthiest to do the most wondrous things.
Groups of people used to bond over the common struggle to stay alive, tough times would bring people together, but when there is no longer this struggle everything will become about status, people will grow colder and more isolated, and there will be a loneliness so great in this world that you can see it in the hands of a ticking clock. The future will make life easier, not happier.
Not a thing in daily life would make me argue that.
But when I listen to physicists, mathematicians, neuroscientists or simply look at the fact that history repeats all too often then my rational side knows that what my senses are telling me is wrong.
Now not being in control does not worry, but how this finding will come to be used by people(probably on the political Left)to make individuals unaccountable to their own actions does worry me. If the belief in free will disappears then the earth will come to resemble a creche even more so than it does already.
In my philosophy no you do not have liberty, your liberty is a delusion, but it's a delusion that no one can take from you.
The belief in free will is(scientifically)going the same way as the belief that man is the centre of the universe, and philosophically man's free will - which is unique to our species - is closely related to the idea that man is the centre of the universe.
Free will is primitive and backward and rationally unsound but altogether intuitive to believe in, and it is intuitive belief(not rational belief)which have most relevance to the real world. My philosophy is clever and accurate, but not very wise therefore I do not live by it.
Maybe there is no continuity. Maybe we live this life over and over again in the exact same way each time.
If it were true I tend think that your actions in this life are not carried over to the next - if they did this would imply to me a fairness to existence which I don't think exists.
Not a part of me believes that the rich man was a saint in his last life or that the cripple was a murderer in his. My opinion is that karma/reincarnation et al are under the surface a completely barbarous way of looking at the world that we've borrowed from the east because it's trendy(sort of)and because we're lazy and superficial thinkers.
To outlive the menace of Team Islam we must become Team GB once again.
The ethics that were have divided us, they have estranged man from wife, child from parent, neighbour from neighbour, individual from nation and left us so fractured and worn out - and so oblivious to our own decrepit state that we now know no better - that we may very well lose to a tribe of sand-dwelling peasants.
In the past people thought only of themselves, at best their class alone, and we now bear witness to the consequences of this aberration of spirit. Instead of sixty million little cogs Britain must become a new machine.
Suggests there may be an ulterior motive, but don't forget that White men(in general)offer women of the world unparalleled financial security and personal freedom - non-white women can't get a better deal anywhere else.
Now you could say that these marriages are pragmatic rather than romantic, but nonetheless these women honour the contract and the vow. We should respect non-white women for having the honour that our own women do not.
But truth isn't always enough is it? I like my own race more than any other - they're most like me and most of my friends and family are White(it makes perfect sense to favour your own) - and I feel I should have my own desire and faith in Whites rewarded: I.e. marry the rare White western woman who is not the degenerate scion of a fallen race, and then live happily after.
Statistically the white man/black woman is an unlikely but successful pairing. They don't happen often, work will when they do.
Generally the White man going outside the race has a better chance of relationship success as every other race of woman is more tolerant than White females. And the reverse is true of our(White)women. Whenever they go outside the race their chances of success go down as no other race of men will tolerate White women to the extent that White men do.
They're a sizable minority in Manchester so there's no shortage of Mosques, and they're a big enough minority to have reached the tipping point where they stop feeling like guests in the country and therefore stop being on their best behaviour. You get to know what they really think and that's just from what you hear them saying in English.
As a White Englishmen a church obviously. You might not get a warm welcome every time but you won't get abused or looked at with complete and utter contempt. I can count with my fingers the number of Muslims who've been nice to me when it hasn't been during a haggle.
It's just one of those faux trendy cliches isn't it? Buddhism: The #1 choice religion that your parents don't belong to. A white person would do well to stint with Buddhism if (s)he wants to be considered properly white, or any other foreign religion that fits well into your home or wardrobe and doesn't require you to do that much.
Immigrants make it so that English talent sits on the bench or on the dole or in some godforsaken council office or cubicle farm. An established nation only requires the achievements of millions of immigrants because millions of its own people are underachieving. Pro-immigration is the tacit admission that we are an inferior people.
Sure there is this idea preached by the political establishment and the old generation that the Englishmen is an inherently lazy and incompetent fellow who deserves his own redundancy at the hands of foreigners, but I think there will be one day a war to prove that this isn't the case.
They do, yes. What we don't celebrate are the winnings of the England international side because there aren't any. In fact you can plot the decline of England FC and Britain PLC with the increasing influx of immigrants.
That seems to be the lifeview of the self-made. I can't help feeling inadequate when I'm the Son of a single parent from a Stoke council estate and my peers are often privately-educated home county types possibly related to the Hawksmoors, but this just makes me try harder and be smarter. When I speak to people from China and India, and listen to how they look up to the West and feel motivated by inadequacy I can appreciate how they feel. And yet my attitude in dating is the complete 180 of this mentality.
I find that feeling under-entitled helps you achieve in business or career whereas feeling over-entitled helps you achieve in love. That gnawing sense of inadequacy is the fuel which spurs you on to be better than the competition in reality, but that same gnawing sense of inadequacy is repulsive to women.
I find the best way for a man is to be a unique mish-mash of humility and arrogance.
Obstinance_Works Forum Posts (3,514)
RE: Matchmaking
I was thinking the same thing. Many don't know what they're looking for, and even if they did, they wouldn't know how to get it.