That's the problem with politicians. Moral relativism.
Once you've crossed one line, you're on the road to hell, so to speak, in terms of justification. Politician's have sacrificed personal responsibility on the altar of political expediency by the time they're elected that morality, any morality, has become a thing of the past for them.
And it doesn't matter what party. They both have their little demons waiting to buy their souls in the special interest shadow-world.
My feeling is we as citizens need to exercise the personal responsibility that the politicians have forgotten, and take our country back. Fiscally, and morally.
Okay, now I'm done with my op-ed piece. I now return you to your regularly schedule insanity.
I did not presume anything about you, sir. I did not even address you. You are the one exhibiting trollish behaviors and as such opened yourself up for presumption. Even by traditional standards.
You're in for a long wait from me. I don't care enough about the subject to research it. I came in, I stated my opinion, and I will defend that opinion as far as I deem necessary, and then I will leave. Ownership of my time is mine.
I'll raise your traditional values with an iota of respect. Did you see any criticism of your posts in my post? Or did you attack an opinion you didn't respect because you have none for yourself?
You can twist your low self-esteem however you like. Only little people need to step on someone else in order to feel taller.
This is the attitude that is destroying the country. I don't completely agree with you so "I drank the Kool-aid"?
Yep. You're right. This country should be destroyed. If people can't remember that they're Americans first and partisan second, than we deserve everything we get.
She's a damn fine looking sock-puppet. And she's already done the local news up in Alaska. Too bad it didn't do a report on Geography, specifically, how far away Russia was.
Man, I wish people would stop letting the cult of Personality get in the way of the real questions. Like, who's behind the curtain pulling all the strings on the marionettes in Washington.
"To walk across the United States of America, while spreading awareness of the dangers of massive government spending to the American people, and show everyone who and what is really out there in the United States of America."
Once Perdie became aware of the massive spending in Washington, he had a hard time focusing on his films. At one point, Perdie had even considered making a film based on a theme that could help to bring awareness to the manipulation brought about by Washington and the media. However, based on the urgency of the situation, Perdie decided to put his film on hold and go on this walk to expedite the awareness of the dangers of massive government spending, while also pushing for the need of personal and fiscal responsibility in the United States.
On his journey Perdie will study human life and interactions so that he can better achieve the level of understanding necessary to make truly insightful narrative films. Many of these observations made will be converted to episodes that will raise questions amounst the viewers about American life and it's values. With this action, Perdie hopes that he can help to unite Americans by showing the country what is really out there instead of having Americans rely on the media for their opinions of each other. Perdie hopes to provoke Americans to inspire themselves to take positive and responsible action in their own lives.
Perdie will be equipped with a fold-up tent, and (when the opportunity presents itself) will stay with various trustworthy Americans willing to house him for a night. Perdie will also encourage Americans to travel with him, even if it is for a small portion of the journey, in order to help accelerate the awareness of the dangers of massive government spending and their assault on our freedoms.
For what is a spoon but an extension of our will? Would it exist without need, and thus, bend as we require, or would it stay in potentia, until called upon to exist?
BTW, the first spoon was our hands. Yet another extension of our will. So the argument would then devolve back to the truth or falsehood of our own existence, into solipsism, if you will.
Come support one of the most innovative civil protest actions that I have ever seen. A young film producer documents his walk across America in protest of big Government spending. Whether you're a Dem or GOP, liberal or conservative, Perdie will talk to you, respect you, and in general, make you think about why we need such a Leviathan in our world.
Then why delete the Clauses on customs and discovery? The right to export without trial, and claim diplomatic immunity from indictment later? They already had the legal right to operate in this country as a visiting law enforcement agency.
Do they need diplomatic immunity as well? Why would that be?
No. Not today your not. Tomorrow the therapy may not work.
Anyway. I don't say that Interpol is evil. I'm saying, why delete the clauses on immunity from external audit? This isn't about Interpol really, this is about the FBI obtaining a level of opacity that makes Iran look liberal, under the auspices of "international cooperation".
Waco and Leonard Peltier were jokes compared to what's coming.
You may not understand the implications of this "executive order" but I do. This just sold our right to habeas corpus to a foreign police force. Along with several other legal rights that I'll not go into (privacy).
The original EO did fine in granting the Interpol reasonable access to our citizenry. To amend it is blatantly a step in surrendering our sovereignty.
They have no transparency under this amendment. The FOIA is now void concerning the Interpol. Instead of creating more transparency like he promised, he has created yet another way for the FBI to avoid the FOIA. All documents are now viewed under the discretion of Interpol. In other words, they control discovery. When discovery is not truly discovery, justice isn't just blind, she's bent over taking if from behind.
So your implication in that statement is that I am not qualified?
That would be the inner darkness at work. The act of judgment, the process of belittling my Buddha nature in order to glorify your own, or that of your "qualified" Lama.
I shall not share further the colors of the rainbow with a blind man, or Mozart with the deaf.
You can't step on the same piece of river twice. I shall flow now. Be peace.
Perdie Across America