I sao not accept any Pseudo intellectual theories and still maintain the opinions that in a woman the needs are 1 A Natural Instinct to fulfill her natural Maternal instincts preferably with 2. A faithful loving partner and that 3. Many men today of all classes have been raised with no sense of self discipline or moral principle whatsoever & no respect for others who do,
" Rules are made for the the guidance of wise men and obedience of fools And it is very true especially when one comes across Managerial Mahogany Desk Jockeys Quoted by GC Douglas Bader - RAF Pilot WW2 - with acknowledgement to GC Harry Day - Born 1898 - Died In 1977 - Pilot - Flying Instructor - Fighter Command, 23 squadron, 1931 & later 1939, joined 57 squadron Bomber Command - WW2 Blenheims - PoW 1939 - 45 Later - adviser on "Reach for the Sky" & "The Great Escape" Films.
What right have YOU or anyone else to suggest that anyone with low skills and lower paid workers who get injured due to a company's neglect or irresponsibility, should deserve less compensation or injury payments than skilled workers or management & mahogany desk flyers (Pen pushers in an office) .
I do not believe in hitting any woman at any time, SO - Read your question with less myopia !! NOT AT ALL relates directly to YOUR question and exactly that !! I am sure other men on CS might agree with me so we will see if they deign to comment similarly.
** pKrema: I don't care what their gender preference is so long as they are not given the position because of it... As it happens so often and for many years... Shouting "discrimination" just because you didn't get the job is pathetic but so popular it leaves a bad taste in the mouth when third, fifth and so on gender is mentioned...**
Before you pick a fight - At least have the intelligence to read the actual comment with which I agreed. - What I wrote was an example directly in context with Krema's statement.
Out of the current batch of 650 odd slugs ? None of the current batch wallowing in the slime of Parliament is sufficiently honest to be there let alone lead the Country & as a pensioner they all want removed I am not joking
That is exactly right And anyone who studies the subject of Spacecraft & power plant technology as a serious development history subject knows that the only nation that continues to push denial of sighting, non existence, prevention of knowledge by making it subject to OSA Threats & brainwashing of the public since 1947 has been the USA. I never argue with any stubborn Person with no actual military experience BUT Another pertinent fact - The US Pentagon Paranoia & influence still applies to those in the UK still alive from 1950's Development squadrons instructions regarding air tests including aircrew, who are, by UK law, still prevented from divulging specific contents of any official report. .
@ mykingdomforanam ** You haven't accounted for all the ufo sightings, that really were weather balloons; and I see Harbal calling attention to them.** and ** "The fact is that (Harbal) Know(s) nothing about our work on Development squadrons.at that time...?"**
I don't have to prove my case to you or anyone else. I am sill not allowed to talk in detail about the reports or air tests as I already said - if you care to actually read it all .
I also suggest that you read the reports of The RAF sightings that ARE now in the Public domain which give details almost the same as WE saw !! I can tell the Aircraft in which I was Flying and that is all .-- They were the Javelin Mk 4, 5 & Mk 7.and the only Mark out of that lot capable of Mach 1 (Supersonic speed) - (in a dive) was the Mk 7 - equipped with Aden Canons & DH Firestreak Heat seeking missiles which at that time were classified secret regarding Mach No & Destruction capability.
That is a Common held view of ill-educated / ill informed Folk in your age group, and many who escaped National Service later - However - You were not even spunk bubbles in your fathers Ball sacks in the 1950's when Russian Aircraft activity, observation & UFO sightings were all recorded by our Services, mainly the RAF & Fleet Air Arm .
Do not assume - Read al the information that is now available before you argue. The fact is that You Know nothing about our work on Development squadrons.at that time and I still cannot by law mention specifics . BUT for your information On all test Flights then we were under instructions to report any sightings even of Russian aircraft over our waters and the North Sea. What we saw was photographed & recorded --- Officially.
MikeD12 Forum Posts (2,809)
RE: Story telling? 4 words per post
there are no rules