Well that's fair. If all actions in that benighted area were treated on their merits (or evils) there might be some hope. However, invasion and occupation are still invasion and occupation no matter what you call them. That's why there is a Hamas. Evil begets evil.
Assuming you and millions of others believe this tripe....I'm now officially just as concerned about the US having the bomb as I am about Iran getting it!
History is history......now is now. The amazing negativity of modern Republicans will come back to haunt them if they get back in power....then they will have to be constructive about something.
I usually save my argumentative side for the lunatic American Christian-Republican-anti-Obama anti-immigrants anti-foreigners anti-gays anti-liberals pro-gun pro-Bible pro-execution anti-Arab anti-Muslim etc people!
I think that I am not in an "in crowd" but that if there were an "in crowd" it would not be much of one without me in it so therefore there can't be an "in crowd".
....possibly some of the non "in crowd" delude themselves into thinking they are in an "in crowd" which of course they cannot be.
....and possibly some of the non "in crowd" think that there IS an "in crowd" that they have been excluded from....which is impossible because I have not excluded them from the non-existent "in crowd".
Fallingman Forum Posts (11,436)
RE: Which political leader would be best suited to run the world under globalism?
Sarah Palin, obviously!