Morgie, surely you've noticed that fairly often when a thread on the "Why can't we all get along and be nice" theme is started, that someone comes in and starts a fight, and then the thread is deleted?
What we construe as a "serious mental health problem" would vary considerably from person to person. In theory - and increasingly in practice - virtually every behavior that seems even slightly questionable or not understood could be labeled as some form of cognitive disorder. Hell, there's probably a term for people who post too much on singles lists!
It comes down to what you can personally tolerate. You may not want to be with someone who's moody or otherwise emotionally mercurial, regardless of whether or not they've been diagnosed as "bipolar" or whatever.
People suffering from panic attacks or greater than "average" mood swings aren't usually going to be classified as having a "serious mental health problem" - any more than people who, say, are impatient or prone to sarcastic humor or get angry more swiftly than "average" are mentally ill.
But that's all in the eye of the beholder. Someone who's extremely neat, for example, might view a clutter-bug as having a serious mental health problem.
So perhaps the first order of business for a thread like this is to attempt some form of psychological classification scheme.
Well, it's true his ideas are utterly worthless...well, far, far worse that worthless, actually - more like unbelievably destructive for humanity as a whole.
But they are certainly worth knowing, just as are the ideas behind the Holocaust. One should know the ideas that are shaping current societies, even if they're harmful. Perhaps especially if they're harmful.
"Fighting fair" - that, I think, is the ticket. And you make a good point about people believing they can say or do anything and be forgiven later. Some things once said cannot be unsaid (or only unsaid at a severe price!). That's a lesson I've learned the hard way.
One thing one must learn is to recognize the line between between speaking freely - we don't want to feel afraid to speak our mind - and between speaking injudiciously.
It's tough to have a relationship if you feel every disagreement may or could very well lead to a breakup. There's isn't much "wiggle room" in that case.
Some people here and elsewhere have the attitude "I don't want any drama in my relationship" - and count arguing/disagreeing as "drama." I see it, like you, Nan, as unavoidable, so it's really a question of how you handle it. (Incidentally, you can have strong disagreements with someone while not openly arguing about them at all. The results of that are generally worse, I think, than from arguing.)
Though couples vary in how much they argue - that's a function of their attitudes about communication, emotional expression, self-assertiveness, and, of course, of their basic compatibility - but in order to have a good relationship, every couple must master the art of arguing *productively.*
Well, what will be, will be, L. Whatever does happen - and it may be better than any of us imagine! - Sass is enjoying this moment, and more power to her on that!
Hmmmm...well, to my knowledge, L, all coffee-makers work the same way (they flush hot water over coffee grounds, which then drips through a filter into a pot), so the only difference would be how thoroughly the grounds are boiled, it seems to me.
Basically, coffee grounds being equal, the only difference can lie in the degree the grounds are "cooked." (Also, the quality of your water could make a difference. I only use filtered water, myself.)
If stove-top brewing results in better-tasting coffee, it would be because the coffee is "stronger" owing to being more thoroughly boiled.
Anyway, the obvious solution is to simply use instant coffee. You can't beat that for great taste and convenience. But then I'm a big fan of Keystone Lite...
RE: Is It Just Me???
I don't blame you.I don't suppose we could argue viciously about it?