Well . . . actually . . . I saw this girl really struggling with a door once and helped her to get it open, just needed a bit of a strong pull is all. Women - the really nice ones - are delicate, dainty things physically unsuited to opening big doors (they get tennis elbow) . . .
In fact, the reason automatic doors were invented by man was for women, because he was so fed up of opening them for her all the time (and of course her logical incapacity and spatial ineptitude caused her to continue around in revolving doors and out again . . .
Hmmm . . . this is what I have always thought about people who are SELFLESS and consider themselves (or are considered) 'saintly'. Whenever someone has preformed an act of kindness towards me for no evident reason I have felt awkward and have even ridiculed them - I don’t think they quite understand this world.
Do you mind guys who open doors for you (if there are any left)?
I despise women who despise such men!!! In my opinion, if they don't want a man who is a gentleman (at least . . . in appearance) then they can go and find a man who is not one . . . there seems to be no short supply . . .
They would indeed . . . I have a limited capacity to be emphatic. But . . . what are you doing here then, did you meet him on here? If not, what were your motives to join connecting singles?
Some? . . . that's a bit of an understatement don't you think? I’d say almost all without exception consider it as a prerequisite to any relationship with a man.
But . . .
Why do 'some' women then (although in my Holy opinion it is MOST women), look for money in men?
What is the psychology behind these fiendish females who let the gender further down?
You need to look at the other religions of the world with a more open mind instead of basing your entire religiously-demined pathetic mind, and consequently your totally limited world-view, on Judaism/Christianity.
Those on this site who have free-thinking minds and actual intelligence that IS THEIR OWN will see, allegorically, in the tale of Adam and Eve, that they are given the freedom to choose and then an agent influences them in their choice.
Don't worry, Omega. I am far, far ahead of you. Light years.
Your 'insights' are nothing I haven't heard and people haven't heard regurgitated over and over again since religion came around to stifle mankind's thinking for hundreds and thousands of years...
The kind of stupid, dogmatic, monotheistic thinking that has been destroying the progress of the human race for centauries.
Your revolution is over!
People are awakening TO intelligence, TO thinking with their own minds and not basing/limiting their thoughts to conviction in monotheistic hate-filled trash.
The truth is coming, unfortunately you will not see it with your blinkered eyes - and you will go into your grave wearing the same blinkers.
Monotheism has been a curse on mankind . . .
One day, mark my prophetic words, mankind will look at The Holy Bible with repulsion, with even more repulsion than at Mien Campf. With its avenging, hateful Jehovah, who commands and punishes and has such divine foresight he delivers a rabble of murderous Jews to their promised land to murder his only begotten son - O the suppression, inquisitions, and hell it has visited on the world and been used for!
But Buddhism will remain like bliss, an agitated tranquility of open minded true compassion, intelligent, thoughtful, beautiful, fearless - a gentle hand that reaches out to you and says 'come with me'
Never used for war, hate, or stifling human intelligenence for purposes of murder, power and control - human madness and fanaticism!
You are a thick one - and the gnome who encourages you is one of the most idiotic, dogmatically-minded monotheists I have ever come across.
Yes, wise one. It would. Because, in an individual, the true moral value of a given action is determined by its INTENTION, not by its outcome. If the outcome of an act or good work done out of fear is called 'good' it is merely the subjective VALUE of that action to another, and not the agent of the action who is 'good'. If a selfless action has value to another they will label it 'good' because it will be 'useful' to them.
If you were motivated out of fear to be selfless, no matter how much your acts were called good YOU would not be good. Just afraid.
Selflessness is labeled universally good and 'moral' because it is of benefit to others, selfishness labeled universally bad and immoral because it is of no benefit to others . . . but of supreme benefit to the one who is selfish. Likewise to those who are selfless without thinking (as Aries is beginning to touch upon), they just disadvantage themselves and advantage others either out of fear or to conform to convention. Where is the true moral value in their INTENTION?
I have always SEEN selfishness as good, and selfLESSness as bad. I have seen that the acts you people call good merely disadvantage me and mine advantage you and yours. And I have NOT gone along.
But I am one of those rare individuals who, should i carry out a moral act, completely selfless and at expense to myself, it will be a genuine moral act with no other motivation. It will have true moral value in its intention.
Most people with their moral philandering are like would-be mothers who love children but expect some form of payback in return for their love.
So, again, the true MORAL value of an action is determined by its intention. The ACTUAL value of an action, by its consequences. That is why 'If such a person is motivated only by fear', it would INDEED demean their good works.
. . . wise one.
I could be whipped every time I didn't throw my spare change to a beggar . . . so every time I throw a beggar spare change would it be an act of good I had done?
Aries is quite right . . . and quite smart.
It seems you are . . . how did she put it? . . . 'not obliged to look inward'
On the other hand, when it comes to me and morality, and my reversal of its conventional values, like my own mother once said, 'the love of decency may not fully abide in my boy, but for all the people who don't get along with him, he gets along perfectly fine without them - and so do we'. er . . . something to that affect . . . it was a long time ago . . .
Women have an incredible ability to expound nonsense and then validate it with a mass agreement. I’m not going to agree with this illogical nonsense.
Evil is just a mystical creature made up [maybe she means The Devil]? The opposite of love is indifference?
I have a picture of Sharon Tate lying on the floor in front of her sofa with her pregnant belly slit open by young girls under the orders of Charles Manson whom they believed to be Jesus Christ. Don’t tell me the opposite of something so positively powerful as love is indifference.
For the opposite of something powerfully positive must be as powerfully negative. Even ‘hate’ is wrongfully attributed as the opposite of something so powerful as Love.
Hate can be quite rational. But Love and Evil can be utterly irrational chaos forces.
Go to school, all of you little girls. Including you . . . Flowers of the . . . Whatever . . .
EastbayRay Forum Posts (781)
people person . . . 
What women look for in men is money
Well . . . actually . . . I saw this girl really struggling with a door once and helped her to get it open, just needed a bit of a strong pull is all. Women - the really nice ones - are delicate, dainty things physically unsuited to opening big doors (they get tennis elbow) . . .In fact, the reason automatic doors were invented by man was for women, because he was so fed up of opening them for her all the time (and of course her logical incapacity and spatial ineptitude caused her to continue around in revolving doors and out again . . .
Ha ha . . .