Like the new pick, though the original you is much more enticing in a "you make me drool" sort of way, this one shows a 'willing to be ridiculous' side
here's you sentence .. and trust me, punctuation would actually prove my point further as well as including the reference to the subject. Not a coma but a semi colon. Even a period would be more apt. And for clarity, we'll replace "it" with the subject you were referring to which is "creationism".
anyway you said
"but just because you don't think "creationism" may be true, doesn't make "creationism" not true....."
with punctuation and structure sort of fixed
"but just because you don't think "creationism" may be true; that, doesn't make "creationism" not true....."
the word "that" is errantly omitted in your original statement. That refers back to "because you don't think it may be true"
"You don't think it may be true "is merely the setup qualifier, it is the the mind saying, "you don't think '"creationism" may be true and this is why...
that doesn't make it not true "." your proving statement with double negs.
two negatives proving a "may"
now remove the double negs and you get "it may be true, makes it true"
again this is linear logic sorting our your paradox logic. your brain is trying its best to reach you in regard to truth
...
I could have improved on your sentence structure more as well.;. but this isnt not really an english lesson
We're Ignoring You- sort of ....
way to stick a big target n yourself Ken