Math is a very good example of the use of linear functions and double negatives.
For the mind to beleive in a god, it has to excersize the left brain functions of paradox logic.
It may exist It may not exist
both are true statements but in possibility only.
but the paradox logical mind accepts the "proving" statement (even though its unproven) that coincides with their desire to believe and hangs its hat on the "may" as being enough support for a truth.
The linear logical mind sees the "may" and immediately chucks "may" out of the statements. It requires real proof, engaging the linear process in search of which one of the statements is true.
Believers tend to be predominantly left brain, paradox information processors for whom "possibility" is the only requirement to accept it as truth.
Of course I have explained this in a linear logic way, so you don't liklely haven't not a clue what I'm not saying...
thats double speak comng from your subconscious Tater... Have a good look. It actually says (removing the double negatives because as you know double negatives cancel each other out)
"Just because you dont think" ...... makes it true" --- support for your god based on "not thinking"
seriously, "thinking" is very much the issue and your subconscious is aware of it. Its trying to wake you up, if you'll just think as it is instructing you to do.
Everyone has their 'knowledge', in this case, some are clearly lacking in knowledge when they form an opinion.
ya they only allow stupid people in scientific feilds christians calling the kettle black me thinks.
archeology dude, get a book... not the Jewish Book of Faery Tales, a real archeology book.
That's just stupid, christian mumbo jumbo as usual ...unsupprted by any facts and filled with inconclusive conjecture presented as fact, no stats, no supporting facts ... Only the ignorant would buy that ... well ...and christians of course, but they already buy made up characters they cant prove.
Same question to you sir
Do those people who call themselves christians really know what they are talking about?
after all their isnt one bible character they can show proof of, even using what christians call dumb scientists or archeology. So how do you prove things you cant show proof of? Pretend...thats how
There are good stories because of Aesop as well... I doubt however that those have led to the mayhem and evil that accompanies religions and their stories and those that would have us think it leads to god, heaven and hell
No one expects to go to Oz, because of The Wizard Of Oz....ya know ...
Amen sista!! and there is no christ to boot. Them Romans!!! funny guys they are... The persians had the same story but theyre savior was persian, the egyptians too, egyptian savior ... but the Romans, now why would they settle for a Jewish savior?
possibly, I'm not up on my dinosaur info (except for the clearly reptilian gov't influence LOL), but my assertion is that "half" species is a rather crude way of viewing evolution. Transitional certainly applies, it doesn't negate it's predecessor or its evolutionary step as half a species.
Evolution can just as evidentialy be proven/viewed as aberrations, so the arguement of 'half' or whole species is tenuous..paradoxical as well it just is what it is, all coming from the same molecular structure with different coding. At least thats my impression from what I've digested.
In the past, a possibility, in the now .... ehhhch ... a being that functions on earth would assumably be subject to the same atmoshperic needs, mars isnt even close to earths atmosphere, so now is doubtful me thinks.
clearly.. reptilians, could live there subterreaneously
she is .. red head too ... for a minute there I considered having the age changed on my birth cert.; but I relented in favour of retaining my crusty older age demeanour.
RE: God vs. Science, REALlITY CHECK
Math is a very good example of the use of linear functions and double negatives.For the mind to beleive in a god, it has to excersize the left brain functions of paradox logic.
It may exist
It may not exist
both are true statements but in possibility only.
but the paradox logical mind accepts the "proving" statement (even though its unproven) that coincides with their desire to believe and hangs its hat on the "may" as being enough support for a truth.
The linear logical mind sees the "may" and immediately chucks "may" out of the statements. It requires real proof, engaging the linear process in search of which one of the statements is true.
Believers tend to be predominantly left brain, paradox information processors for whom "possibility" is the only requirement to accept it as truth.
Of course I have explained this in a linear logic way, so you don't liklely haven't not a clue what I'm not saying...