I guess, we will see very soon, what is the opinion of the ICJ on this topic, as well as there are numerous other strong voices throughout the world and by leading major bodies which have another viewpoint. Not just since yesterday but at latest since the foundation of the conflict.
Hope for truth still exist and we are able to vitness that sometimes truth penetrates the rising walls of public censorship by the following example:
An online survey of the US population concerning the deaths due to the so called COVID-19 vaccination is re-published after the public service allies of the pharma mafia failed with their first censorship attempt.
The current trend of developments of significant changes towards dictatorship of or in so called "democracies" are more and more obvious.
Not only that the Right of Free Speech is heavily under attack, but the concerted and across borders campaigning and missuse by governments, military, economic, science, social and cultural leaders of (public) media and opinion building processes, seems to become a clear phenomenum of our times.
Its up to the people, to identify these threats on our democracies, to point on the misuse and to vote or protest accordingly.
unfortunatly, I am afraid to say, the title is not really correct.
Many of the most activities today and the current economic system are not necessarly made for the benefit of human or overall life but just for making profits.
In so far, I doubt, all of the inventions have a necessity. Often, the mother of inventions is motivated by greediness and the motivation to exploit as much as possible.
Facts which prooves the statement are - among others - given under many frameworks and are part of - for example - in management education.
its not easy to rescue the world as a non-profit or charity worker since there are millions of professionals which are payed to exploit humanity & the world.
I would say, Western civilisation has no sufficient and adequate consideration for these sort of questions and related to the heart.
They usually only care about matters of the heart in a medical (physical) way.
To some level they are able to consider it in relation to behavioural or psychological aspects. But this is mainly seen in terms of a therapy as soon someone comes apart from the norms.
In total, I assume (as a non speicalist but by some understanding), Western civilisation is unable and not competent to answer questions in such things. They have only very few knowledge about it as they have reduced the human capacity for their own purposes and which are mainly materialistic and economic oriented.
Some theorists say, its rather the End of History instead of the End of the World.
Its possibly also a question of the terms. End of History can imply the means of End of the World in terms of how we want understand the `World´.
I think, the world can be seen as what we know, how we interpret or how we understand the world. But this does not necessarly imply the end of the `pysical´ world as a planet.
Yeah, I guess, there are many different thought models, concepts and believe systems which have studied and which study the question of Time and Space:
You can find evidence in many sourses around the world and since centuries, among others, first of all, in many branches of Religions, and latest, in (modern) Physics, as well as in the so called Esotheric movement(s).
Interesting subject but obviously not proofable (according human mind).
My assumption so far is, the division as it is shown today is possibly (just) the outcome of a wider and deeper long term strategy which is applied in the course of specific political aims in order to re-design the pillars of a society and a social community, as it is represented by a state order finally.
One of the most obvious initial motives for this transformation is of an economic nature according the principle of the division of labor. In addtion, now, the sought social impact out of this labor division results simultanously also into total individualisation. Not only for economic reasons but for better control of the population by advanced division in terms of social and cultural means.
Interestingly, we can find some evidence of your points and of my above assumption in some established thought models in most of relevant humanity and social science sources.
In my view so far, in contrast to this supposedly scientific knowledge, and in particular as far it applies to political systems, all the theoretical models according the human science system and logic, include a massive capital error:
The whole system is based on `Wetern´ thought and theory models. Usually they do not consider sufficiently - and never mind - not saying, equal conditions by involving other civilisational and otehr culural findings.
In so far, I think, the whole founding concepts for gender politics and policies pretend a sort off universalism and universal standard but without appropriate inclusion of all findings of humanity.
Therefor, it may be highly potentially fair to say, the applied system and theories which fosters and promotes the advancement of the division of gender is possibly exactly the opposite of what it pretends by saying, womans are to be set on a par.
In fact, equality exist in other cultures but according different values, standards and measuring methods.
Just my opinion so far, and as a possible ad-hoc summary out of some few sources.
I think, the listed individuals are mainly divided into three interest groups:
1. some whó represent the global public elites, mostly leaded by (Western heavily influenced) so called globalists towards specific agenda`s (e.g. Agenda 2030).
2. some whó represent the private elites, mainly motivated to gain global influence including in the public space and mainly also part of the so called (Western influenced) globalists and their agenda`s.
3. some whó represent national/territorial elites, not necessarly part of the Globalists but contributors to global policy trends such as the specific agenda`s (in particular Agenda 2030).
So what is remarkable? Who is missing?
No one who represents anything independent from global trends.
Anyway, there are very, very few who may advocate for the people instead of other interests.
Basically, in my opinion, there are only two main differences today: the nationalist/patriots according the old territorial system and the globalist according one world policies / agenda`s.
... and bear in mind while thinking about the next generation of G6 transmission tech for mobile networks (SMART phone) is already in full swing being researched at all fronts
this G6 tech will interconnect human body with A.I.
the religion of these WEF guys and their politician puppets is called TRANSHUMANISM
(...) We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations. We support continued international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics, that should capitalize and build on the success of the existing standards and digital COVID-19 certificates.
24. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the transformation of the digital ecosystem and digital economy. We recognize the importance of digital transformation in reaching the SDGs."
I guess, it`s up to humanity, the people, if they want accept being under the total control of some few who want to take absolute control through high tech and A.I..
From my perspective and as far as I understand and know the situation, the elite`s aim to control the masses by their digitalisation and in order to replace their old system by a new overwhelming system for all aspects of life, is not justified, nor legitimate.
In my view, they - and the alliance with all sympathising or even commissioned politicians - have no right at all for what they try to introduce on the basis of major Puplic-Private-Partnership contracts.
I think, people should develop their own solutions for their future with new structures and new institutions, where corrupt politicians and industry magnats are kicked out of a new democracy model which serves the people and not the elites.
Sorry, what is the purpose of your misleading headline?
I think, thats not a balanced view.
Why?
Because otherwise, it would be just fair, that Russia or any other threatening country to the UK, should set its boots next to your door in the UK.
I think, that would be just the correct and simple answer to your one sided war view which may aims to spread fear as a tool for war propaganda purposes.
what about being careful of what is being used regarding the so called "vaccines"?
why people should be pressed by getting experimental somethings which are statistically approved (WHO,EMA data) being more harmful than all regular certified vaccines of the last 30 years all together??
Moreover, who gives the right that governments disrupt and violates citizens and human rights based on assumptions and -partially- manipulated statistics???
BTW teh same sort of narrative was in use before when big pharma tried to tell their fairy tales with the other vaccines with their mass formation campaigns in 2003 and 2009.
However, the cooperation between governments and industry is - in my opinion - not anymore acceptable.
it may can be said, that audio/music creation, recording and its reproduction, and so finally its listening, is a sort of therapy in sense of attempting to reflect the vibes of the unity of the universe from our perspective as human being.
You may find also some comments interesting where in diverse civilizations people tried to identify the logic of organized sounds resulting in music:
For example,
"at the healing centers of Asclepieion at Pergamum and Epidauros in Greece, patients underwent therapy accompanied by music."
or
"The Roman statesman, philosopher and mathematician, Boethius (480-524 A.D.) explained that the soul and the body are subject to the same laws of proportion that govern music and the cosmos itself."
For example but not limited, recent EU Commission presidency von der Leyen commented, that in the European Union are about 130 million people having not participated in the experimental injections.
You can also check the WHO official statistics under VigiAccess.org which, among others, lists at least the distribution of the side effects of the drug experiments by continents. This may provide also an idea where you may find less injected people.
gypman Forum Posts (41)
RE: What changes do you want in CS?
comment function schould be editable or deleteable in sense of necessary corrections or alike.Variants to re-edit could include:
- according a specified fixed timeframe (e.g. after X hour(s) or X day(s) change is not possible anymore
OR
- in case a comment would have been posted in response to a comment
OR
- in case a specific numer of an ongoing discussion has followed the posted comment (e.g. 3 further postings after a comment was posted or alike)