The only difference would be, i would never use the word god of...but i guess people used that word more as a metaphor. And not as something, omnicient, omnipotent. That involves with human life as a moralizing greatness, but rather as something that contributes to life.
I am more inclined to believe in natural elements that provide me with life than an imagined doctrine. People have always had a tendency to name things ... amen / amon ... sun / sky and what else. But those things are clearly visible ... so no problem with that either.
That depends on the way a believer policies his faith.
Are they following their own perception of faith (god),
Something that I can understand much more about, because it gives those people a feeling of safety (I will leave it open as to whether this feeling is justified), maybe they don't want a real answer at all and they accept their fate. And just need something to hang on? Nothing wrong with that. Yet somewhere there is fear of ending up in whatever afterworld (heaven or hell). From that point of view you can say that the moralizing in their belief is indeed a split personality, in the form of a fictional god and devil.
Or are they following the manuscript (book) as the given word of god? In that case...god is the devil,
And by believing that, they end up in a constant conflict. Considering these books as being the word of god (The all-powerful, all-knowing. and thus is the maker of past, present and future), so should be without any error or contradiction. And as we can scientifically prove, there are huge contradictions to be found in the book. Just to name a few, the earth is flat, the sun disappears into a mud pool, the sky is carried by mountains, etc. Many times the excuse is used that one has to interpret that text in the spirit of the time, which in turn is in contradiction with the omniscience of that god ... god did not know that man was getting smarter, and would discover that it was all not true is. And when I refer to the "last" revelation (Quran) the new version? We discover even more contradictions, claiming that a marriage between a "prophet" aged 40+ and a child aged 6, and this marriage consummated at the age of 9 is acceptable defies all imagination. Further claim that your own book is not difficult to understand, and it gives the possibility to make this interpretable in 1001 different ways, is therefore also a contradiction with omniscience. Claiming that man has free will and claiming that you (god) are omniscient is another contradiction, since the omniscient knows in advance where you will end up, so you have no choice or will. If you, as a human being, would be able to go against his (gods) will, proves that god is not omnipotent.
In view of all the foregoing, it can be safely said that all those stories booklets "Genesis,thora,new testament,bible,quran" were written by none other than humans. And certainly not by anything omnipotent and omniscient! AMEN...
So, can I say that all prophets can be either real or false? Depending on the interpretation of prophecies spread by them? Because all prophets claim to have received the word from god, but no of those prophets can confirm that statement ( Because god appeared only to them "the prophets", without witnesses or public revelation of his existence.), any more than anyone previously demonstrated the four versions (all four of which I can interpret differently), but which one is the version distributed by god? And if someone points out that version to me, how do I know it was spread by the good or false prophet, since that is impossible ...
The word forgive is a very versatile acronym, and it should be used very carefully in the context of what should be forgiven. Forgiveness therefore does not also mean forgetting, and that is very closely related. As someone mentioned, forgetting to put the toilet seat down / up ... it is forgivable and forgetting, Cheating, lying etc ... falls under a completely different context. And that is a lot harder to forget / forgive I think.
I think i questioning things to deeply, Can you forgive me?
To answer that doppelganger, had to meet him and have a conversation, would be hugely tiring ... since I question everything, and my double does the same thing ... so endless conversations.
Well, you never know when those guy´s (aliens) show up...i guess... But I suppose the preference "Are no children or at least no children living at home"
I seen a fair number of women's dating profile on this and other sites...I have noticed the negativity and man bashing on the written description...supposed to be about the woman...but instead one single line about her...and many lines about what a man must be and must not bedoh rolling on the floor laughing
A word of advice...A player won't care and will still try to play you...no matter how much you rant on your profile about men...The chances are you will attract the very men you claim to not wantdoh laugh
There is a lot to say about that, but if we reverse the roles ... this also applies to men ...
Is it a red flag to you...if someone has been divorced 3 times or more? Yes Is it a red flag to you...if someone is still Married but separated? Depends Is it a red flag to you...if your date has never been married? Nope,some people just don't want to marry, or remarry.(Specialy today...and there are reasons for that). But there are more red flags for whether or not to marry or marry again of course
Well, I have now learned several things from this "manipulated" pandemic.
I absolutely don't need anyone to survive, I don't feel isolated because I was already, before that virus came out. It gives me the opportunity to view those things from a distance and to be objective.
For example, Spain turned into a police state, banning people from standing up against the government. And also forbid people to collect and share evidence (with cameras or mobiles) against bad behavior by police or politicians. Fines range from 600 to 30,000 euros, plus jail time. And the rest of the European countries are now following. You can only believe the "fake" news that is spread over the media, which is spread by the same police states. everything else that proves the contrary is moderated and erased by those same governments. And social media techs such as facebook, google, you tube etc ... are obliged to apply this censorship. Also making vaccines compulsory is coming under the guise of safety, just like chipping, fingerprints, dna etc ... all will be mandatory, nothing stands in the way of managing the world population.
So, i guess a revolution is comming up, but also that is moderated by politics, it doent matter what kills people, aslong it depopulate the population...its ok.
The one and only person that translated right, is Daniela, if you like it or not!
I am Belgian, speak french, dutch and several other languages, even the belgian french is different from the french in France...but, when it depends on the right explenations, both are simular.
More than that, it was not only about the fact that the expression is wrong, but it is about being helpful to you, and learning to use a different language in the right sentence. Your reaction is therefore childish, not that of both other ladies.
I would say, go play yourself if you can´t stand critism.
I HATE phones, really i do, they are the most annoying inventions of the century. Don't get me wrong, they are useful, if you use them right, but often is the most disturbing thing around me. People go to a meeting or date, and staring all the time at there cellphones ¨ Its a real TURN OFF for me¨. And sorry lady's, but you are the worst in this scenario. I can understand when you are not interested in the person you meet, you just brake off the meeting, but be so uneducated to take your phone and ignore the person, says more about your attitude and personality then you can imagine. It never happen to me personally, but i saw it often that a couple sitting together and she was just messaging and calling on the phone..... So, no it doesn't means he is married, probably he just hate phones like me
Consider Trump and his brided pawns of reaction. Trump and 80% of his fans hate the general public.
A typical response from someone who has lost the election or referendum, and therefore also shows his true face. True face, I am not democratic at all, because I do NOT recognize the choice of the MAJORITY. People choose against the established political world, they have no confidence in it. And they are right!.
Posted by DeeDee; Stay away from ring leaders and gang members. If they are like this on here they are like this in real life. People who stand on their own two feet here are not hard to spot Watch those for a while. If you like them...pm....then start from there.
Dont waste your time on idiots, Anna...your too classy and ladylike for that.
Fully agree with this opinion, i would take this as one of the best advice i saw here.
Geronimolion Forum Posts (63)
RE: Religions/Beliefs/Perceptions
The only difference would be, i would never use the word god of...but i guess people used that word more as a metaphor. And not as something, omnicient, omnipotent. That involves with human life as a moralizing greatness, but rather as something that contributes to life.