I also think your reasons for being here could have some effect on how you behave. People who are truly searching for a soul mate are likely to be more guarded and polite. If you just here to kill time and amuse yourself you might tend to get little more frisky. Just a thought.
Well I think if someone posts often enough and on different topics you can begin to get some understanding of how they are in real life. But I also think that is not true of all who post here. Even in real life you really only get to know a relative few people really well, and that is the ones you choose to let into your life. There is something very different about standing face to face and looking into someone's eyes compared to an anonymous picture [or blank] on the internet. And I agree with Berrie that people act differently in private mail than they do on an open forum. Just my opinion.
That may not always be the outcome. I posted this in post #8, but I'll put it here again. Have you heard of Straight Statistics Anna?
Another analysis of British data on colon cancer, by the watchdog group Straight Statistics, concluded that screening 1,000 patients for 10 years will prevent two deaths from the disease. Meanwhile, colonoscopies lead to "serious medical complications" in 5 out of every 1,000 patients, according to a 2006 report in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Given these risks, my guess is that a rigorous examination of colonoscopies will find that their benefits do not outweigh their downside.
What it means to me they are more than twice as likely to hurt you than they are to help you. Anyway just thought I would offer a little support for people who chose against having it done.
I think chewing the leaves turns your teeth dark brown. You can get the leaves legally in Ecuador. They make a tea out of them that is supposed to help with altitude sickness.
You're lucky. I've probably talked to at least 10 people who had it done. They all say they found a polyp or two and they snip them off just to be safe. Then they send them out for testing and they come back negative for cancer.
Another analysis of British data on colon cancer, by the watchdog group Straight Statistics, concluded that screening 1,000 patients for 10 years will prevent two deaths from the disease. Meanwhile, colonoscopies lead to "serious medical complications" in 5 out of every 1,000 patients, according to a 2006 report in the Annals of Internal Medicine. Given these risks, my guess is that a rigorous examination of colonoscopies will find that their benefits do not outweigh their downside.
RE: r u ...O r d i n a r y... ?
No need to be so humble Krema, if anyone here could master Telekinesis it would probably be you.