Really getting inside your head and shutting of your senses to the outside world so you can really really become present in side your head and aware of yourself in there...it's the.route to insanity if you did it often enough...because eventually you won't be able to escape...same way as prisoners are freed but yet can't escape the chains in their minds...scary stuff imo
almost 200 wars with countries you've no business being in and a wake of death and destruction left whereever ye go...not to mention the blood of millions upon millions of innocent peole on your hands...and take a look at your roads, healthcare, education, quality of life and ask yourself was your paying for all these wars and deaths worth it, because it was your taxes that paid for all of it...
yes,, I remember him from many years ago. If memory serves me correctly he was (living? ) in the UK and got married to an english woman...and she moved to Pakistan with him..I remember there being a lot of talk about the marriage and that she wouldn't last five minutes....He was (is) a good man from what I can remember and I'm glad to hear he's looking after his own people....
Am I reading you right? They've separated? If so that's a shame...they've been together decades now...
They found the remains of a man, they've worked out he was 24 or 25 at the time of his death and lived at least some 8,000 years ago (it might even be 10k, not entirely sure to be honest). It was an incredible find becuase he was pretty much in tack and here were still partial remains of his shoes (made from thick mossy material/grasses etc and bound with ropes fashioned out of sineuous grasses), he had a rucksack a bow bag and some arrows.
Anyway, on some of the arrow tips they found blood. The scientists did dna tests, and it turned out to be someone else's blood (he had been shot in the back by an arrow and killed).
I wont bore you with what else the scientists gleaned as it's irrelevant to your question. But one thing is for sure, he died by someone else's hand and he had shot at and hit, probably hurt, someone else. Why, they don't know, but what it shows is that even our most primitive ancestors were trying to kill each other....
And just in case I haven't sent you to sleep I suspect we picked up our aggression gene when homo sapiens met with the Neanderthals. Neanderthals were a very very intelligent but docile species of human Home sapiens on the other hand were highly aggressive and even though they interbred with the neanderthals they still killed and totally wiped out the Neanderthals. Now, some 80,000 generations later the vast majority of humans have at least 1 or 2% neanderthal genes in them, excecpt for Africans who hailed from south of Northern Africa)...
Sooo... I guess my answer to your question is that even if we didn't have weapons we'd still be fighting and trying to killl each other....and we had weapons going back at least 8,000 years..
Actually that's not true..and I'd be obliged if you'd try to be some ways gracious...if you can.., my user name is Blathin..if I want it changed I'll be the one doing it not you..
Absolutely not...I'd rather burn it than see my taxes go to the church and keep those self indulgent, lardy arsed, lazy, condescending, w*ankers fed... Lot of them should be tied up, thrown in a ditch and set on fire if you ask me...
I know, it's insane..but put 20 people in room together and you can be sure rather than work together theyll end up divided and fighting with each other...I've seen it over and over and over again...
And yet when people do stand up to those who're abusing their power it's amzing how fast they fall and lose their power..
its so easy, but yet here we are....arguing over who's right and whos wrong whilst we all being ruled by psychopathic tyrants who're destroying society the world over..and getting away with it...it defies logic it really does...
RE: What is the difference?
I think I'll be okay as long as I resist bod's attempts to spiritualise me.[/quoterun circlip...run...save yourself.