More vacuous rubbish .... I'm not the one begruding someone their success..you are...and in the most disgusting vile way too. You must be a very fragile man to resort to such things..
It must absolutely kill you, an ageing, middle aged, white male, who's probably never achieved much with his life (and no one else to blame but himself) to see a young, African American,woman, do what he could never ever do in his entire life....rise to the heights of power in the most powerful government in the world. and be good at it.....
Well suck it up ya mean old man...that's life, get over it...
You're the man who on numerous occassions has attributed successful women's success to their laying on their back and parting their legs...
And you have the nerve to say someone else is mentally unfit...men with your disgusting attitude are the ones with problems and they probably go way beyond the realm of psychological as well.....
Oh absolutely there are..just not the type I'd be attracted to that's all..can't be salivating over every man ya know Sel..girls gotta have some boundaries
I never said it was. Then again metaphysics is such a big word it can cover a lot of things...some very interesting too.
What I meant, was that I don't give any credence to (airy fairy) things like horoscopes, religion, self actualisation (which basically means realising you're trapped inside your own head) and other such airy fairy stuff...e.g. those stones you see people going nuts over..and dangling things (dream catchers) over their bed. Total nonsense and will catch more dust than dreams if you ask me.....
Not sure what you're trying to say there...but it sounds like you might be trying to say my type would be someone who could challenge me mentally? Maybe...maybe not
Not sure why any woman would want to be challenged physically
Sadly, I've known quite a few married couples down through the years who'd probably say the same thing...and what's worse is that most of them are still very unhappily together.
Most women? So you've asked most women then, or are you presuming to assume....again?
The so called "leader" of the pack isn't always the wisest option imo...best way to assess a man is to watch how he treats his own mother, father, siblings etc...and how he treats you.
I've been in relationships with so called "leaders of the pack"..and to be honest it's almost always other people's perception of him and not who he really is underneath.....personally I've found the best kind of man is a man who's kind, warm, forgiving and strong enough to be his own man and has no interest in trying to to live up to how others perceive him to be....if it isn't him....
We? You might speak for yourself thank you very much...
Bit of a silly question Youcannow. I would assume that you already know those girls choose to starve themselves . Whereas the animals don't get any choice..it's forced upon them...Rubicon of difference don't you think?
Ask any shopkeeper about the way people shop and they'll tell you it's curious the way the shop could be empty one minute and next thing a group show up together at the same time...it seems we do move in groups, whether we're aware of it or not...and that implies there could be some sort of collective sub-conscious...
When Princess Diana died I remember reading about some scientists who took measurements of some sort of frequency and apparently during the few days following her death the frequency had attenuated slightly. Now I'm not someone for any sort of airy fairy rubbish but I do believe there could be something of interest in their observations...
RE: Margaret Thatcher .
Maybe you should do a bit of reading because not one word of the above is correct or even remotely factual.