The most ridiculous stuff does seem to come from social media alright or crazies who have their own website/s etc. But, in fairness, I think we all know the press aren't above a bit of propaganda themselves..
Sure it's not me making any claims Dedovix, it's you.
What I'm like in the sack is something you'll only ever be dreaming about....
I wasn't ridiculing you, you were doing a fine job of that all by yourself..
So you don't need to back up the nonesense you were posting but I now have to prove some ridiculous theory you have is wrong. Again , it's you making the claim, so it's you that needs the proof, not I.
No...don't do that You were adamant that that court case's ruling said our use of their vaccine gave them jurisdiction over our body? But now you seem to have changed tack and are trying to say the London Olympics was the stage for something entirely different and unrelated..
It's hard to answer that, because they keep changing their minds. First Russia was the bees knees, then it was the enemy, then they were all hugs, kisses and candyfloss...right now they're a little afraid because Russia is making so many more friends than the US are, who're losing friends..I think the US might be getting a little frantic over the lack of attention.
I heard some reporter reiterating what Dominic Cummings said. God if I were English I'd be furious. Cummings is a bit of a snake himself so I don't know if I'd believe everything he'd have to say either.
The allegations should be investigated though and if found to be true Boris Johnson should be put on trial for terrorism, because that's what it boils down to, or treason at the very least..
you might check the date on that as well Dedovix, it's 2013.
And a quick look on Wiki outlines what the case was actually about. I quote
"Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013), was a case challenging the validity of gene patents in the United States, specifically challenging certain claims in issued patents owned or controlled by Myriad Genetics that cover isolated DNA sequences, methods to diagnose propensity to cancer by looking for mutated DNA sequences, and methods to identify drugs using isolated DNA sequences."
Not in a million years would any court make the quantum leap of going from the above hearing to humans being owned by the company due to the use of their product/s...never....
"the lab technician unquestionably creates something new when cDNA is made. cDNA retains the naturally occurring exons of DNA, but it is distinct from the DNA from which it was derived. As a result, cDNA is not a “product of nature” and is patent eligible under §101, except insofar as very short series of DNA may have no intervening introns to remove when creating cDNA. In that situation, a short strand of cDNA may be indistinguishable from natural DNA.9 "
..."Nor do we consider the patentability of DNA in which the order of the naturally occurring nucleotides has been altered. Scientific alteration of the genetic code presents a different inquiry, and we express no opinion about the application of §101 to such endeavors. We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible under §101 simply because they have been isolated from the surrounding genetic material."...
Dedovix, this nonsense isn't even worth arguing with. It's utter rubbish and as a grown man you're an even bigger fool to be giving it any heed...
There are also errors in that statement ....glaring ones. If you spent as much time trying to learn about it as you do posting this rubbish, you'd be well informed by now and actually have something to say worth reading and discussing...
RE: education in UKor other country they speak English
And Ali's straight in there, no messing around...