alexey8alexey8 Forum Posts (1,496)

RE: I HAVE FIGURED OUT WHY THE LEFT CALL PALIN UNQUALIFIED..

confused Maybe if you just listen to Sarah Palin and analyze what shes says, you will be able to tell that she is inexperienced and is in no way ready to lead a nation, therefore making her unqualified for the Presidency. She is qualified in the sense of age, birthplace, and so on. But, when it comes to the experience you need to run a country, she lacks that almost entirely. You might like her personal beliefs and her political stance on the issues she talks about. But, she is in no way experienced or educated enough to hold the highest office in the US. She lacks a great deal of foreign policy and understanding of foreign policy. She has very limited government experience. She did not even complete a single term as governor.

RE: The Obama lobbyist at CS

confused So, if you are not American you can't have interest in American Politics? dunno

I think the fact that the poster you are referring to is Danish is irrelevant. And going with your logic, what does an American in France care about a Danish citizen? tongue

RE: The Dude....How many really exist

laugh Yes I notice, your threads always get intense...and a lot of words tongue They are interesting threads though. A lot of different viewpoints. Keep up the good work bro! And one of these days I will stop by when I have more time to spend online!

handshake

RE: being a president

None of these qualifications you have presented would ensure a better president.

And they already do investigations on presidential candidates...and as for a polygraph, what good would that do? What they want to do as president and what they end up doing as president can and normally always is different. And you can be honest on the polygraph, but that doesn't mean they will be an honest president.

And there already is a qualification to be born in the US...which I think is really an unimportant rule. I think someone who is running for president should spend the majority of their life living in the US...but if you were born in another country and then were adopted as a baby by Americans (in USA) or moved to USA as a infant or even very young child and spent the rest of your life living in USA, I don't see why that should disqualify you from being president.

RE: The Dude....How many really exist

Dude is running for president in 2012, so he needs to appeal to all writing styles! He is the real deal! professor

laugh wave Hey dude!

RE: Obama succeeded on health care law. Is that Good for America?

That is NOT what Socialism is! doh

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

rolling on the floor laughing Just waiting for the Health Care Forums wave to ride out... laugh

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

laugh I guess Obama threads are the new Israeli threads here rolling on the floor laughing

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

wave Hey Conrad. How are you my friend?

There are so many threads now about the same Obama topics I can't remember which ones I have posted on. doh laugh

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

Yes, right there are many forms...Socialism, Communism, Marxism, Bolshevism, Stalinism, Nationalist Socialism, and so forth. But, if one says Obama is a "Marxist" I assume they are referring to Marxism and the ideas of Marxism. Anyway, you are right it does get messy and confusing. Which is part of my point. People are using which ever term they think of, but that makes there points slightly different.

A true communist economy would not be illegal according to our Constitution. There would be aspect that would be questionable, but it is the same with a capitalist market. But, a lot of the questionable areas would rely on how the market is regulated. In a communist economy...there would be equality. Everyone who worked 10 hours would receive the same salary for that 10 hours, regardless of the job. But, that is no different then setting a minimum wage. And if you want to earn more money, you are free to do so by working more hours. So, there is not a limit to how much you can make in a month/year...but there is a standard pay grade for 1 hour of work. Just as there is a standard pay grade in any job now. Anyway, I am not going to break down an entire economic plan on here, but I think you see my point that it is not unconstitutional. So, therefore Communism or even Socialism would not destroy or harm the Constitution.

You could make an argument, that Communism doesn't have any rank structure, everyone is an equal...so there wouldn't be a congress, president, Supreme Court because they would have to be equal to each other, and equal to the people...but then again, if you really look at the constitution, they are suppose to be elected representatives of the people, for the people, and by the people...and are not to have more power then the other. So, with that concept it can actually fall in line with Communism.

Anyway, I am not saying that the US should become a communist country, but what I am saying that a communist economy would not be against the Constitution. Neither would a Socialist Economic or even Political System.

Enjoy your shower. handshake

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

Well, the biggest problem is not really the president and what he does or doesn't do...because the real players are Congress. They are the ones making the bills and really determining the future of this country. And I really think Congress has wasted a ton of time and really does not have the best interests of the American People in mind...but rather have selfish interests in mind. sigh

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

I am not a huge fan of Obama either, I can't stand either political party. They are all doing a terrible job and all doing a fantastic job of destroying the country. But, that being said..the Democratic Party and Obama are far from being Socialist or a Marxist. And Socialism and Marxism is related, but they also have different philosophies and aspects, they are not entirely the same. But, people here are using them interchangeably...which further shows that people do not understand these terms. And you are right Obama hasn't been a good president...he hadn't been a bad one either though...really he hasn't done a whole lot.

RE: THE TIME IS RIPE..FOR RE-EDUCATION...LEARN TRUTH..AVOID THE LIES

laugh Interesting, so now Socialism is unconstitutional. rolling on the floor laughing I see you have a great understanding of the Constitution. laugh

I also didn't know that the US was in such great shape all the way till Obama took office. I get the trillion dollar debt that the US accumulated under Bush was no big deal at all because he was a (R) and all (R) are responsible. laugh

The Democratic Party was infiltrated by the communist party? Wow, that is a good one! You know, you should apply for a job at Fox News, they would love you.

I have watched Fox News, and you know what I have notice? Mass amounts of hypocrisy. If the right does it, its all good...if the left does it, its evil. There are plenty of things that Obama has done that Bush did, and when Bush did them, they were great and that was okay to do...but when Obama did them, they were evil and anti-american.

Fox News reminds me State Ran Propaganda channels.

RE: I can't believe anyone still likes Obama

laugh The tax payers are the ones who pay for welfare, so we are already paying for them doh

RE: I can't believe anyone still likes Obama

A Socialist Health Care System would be one that care for the entire country, it would cover all people who lived in the country (citizens and residents). There are hospitals and clinics that provide the care. And it covers all the basics. There are many countries that have a Socialist Health Care Plan, so they vary from country to country. The US Health Care System, is not going to be for the entire country, it will benefit a lot of people, but not everyone. So, that is a huge different. That is the one of the major differences. And the fact that it won't be covering a lot of people, that takes away the idea of it being a Socialist Health Care System. There are other difference, but I think that is a major one.

RE: I can't believe anyone still likes Obama

Between me and Obama? Or a socialist health care plan and the current proposed US health care plan? dunno

RE: I can't believe anyone still likes Obama

handshake Good to see you my friend.

Not much variety in the threads these days...seems they all revolve around health care in the US. laugh

RE: I can't believe anyone still likes Obama

I am glad you have such an excellent grasp on history and politics! doh

I am a Socialist, and I am tired of hearing that Obama is a Socialist because he is not... A socialist health care system would be excellent and a benefit to everyone...but that is not what they are doing at the moment

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

Yes, I will become a Musical Historian tongue

hmmm I should start posting on Wikipedia rolling on the floor laughing

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

popcorn

"This land is my land, this land isn't your land...from the Gaza Strop the Golan Heights...this land is historically mine" violin

Since, I created this song, I am going to go ahead and place a historical claim of the Israel/Palestinian land as historically Russian. So, therefore the land should immediately be integrated into the Russian Federation. =D


rolling on the floor laughing This argument is really ridiculous, as it just goes around in a circle...

popcorn

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

professor But don't worry someone else will bravely post another thread on this topic after this one is locked or removed!

super




rolling on the floor laughing

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

That can be the solution! To send a well trained Gingerbreadmen Army to Israel/Palestine to act as an international Peacekeeping force! They can all mediate negotiations rolling on the floor laughing tongue

gingerbread

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

popcorn gingerbread popcorn

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

blues help


laugh

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

doh And there will probably be no progress made either uh oh laugh

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

professor But, if you push the quote button it make it appear that one is following carefully! rolling on the floor laughing

Well, in just a hot topic, I think its very hard to follow everything and to listen to everything. This topic especially seems to be very personal to a lot of people, and many people get very passionate over it. Its great to be passionate about a topic, however sometimes that can lead to emotions interfering.

But, many people are making very good points...the problem...both sides have very good points, arguments, and claims. If there was a simple answer and a simple who was right or who was wrong, the problem would have been solved long ago. But, there is no simple solution, and both sides have good claims, good arguments, and good points. Also both sides have done their share wrong and terrible things to achieve their agendas.

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

Money and Power are a couple reasons why they can't sigh

Good post! thumbs up

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

confused Something strange happened with my first post on the thread...and it re-posted twice but not at the same time confused

Sorry about that! doh

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

hug Hello!

I haven't notice the increase in Israeli settlements =P haha, of course I have noticed. The Israelis should put a halt on the construction of further settlements, because that is an issue that normally breaks or damage the peace process.

RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)

I am just going to take a guess here and say no matter what anyone says, this topic will remain unsolved and unresolved when this thread reaches its post limit (or gets banned). I also guess that 99.9%-100% of all the people on here posting will not change their position. laugh

hmmm

But, who cares who had the land first? It is irrelevant now. There are both the Jews and the Palestinians living there now. So, the need to focus on solutions, instead of the constant argument of whose land it is historically, who is better, and so on...because those arguments aren't getting them anywhere. And neither the Jews or the Palestinians plan on just leaving...so time to change the focus.

Back to watching the "debate"

popcorn

This is a list of forum posts created by alexey8.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here