I meant that even with other resources, it still isn't as much as when working. Sorry if that wasn't clear. (I'm very aware that social security was not intended to be a complete replacement. thanx)
1. I recognize that Life is peppered with many 'shoulda, woulda, coulda's'. However, in the final analysis, I;m satisfied with myself. 2. Yes, I am very satisfied with my life. It's been very challenging in so many ways, but everybody goes through those trials. Staying focused on the great things helps. And, I live at The Beach!! 3. Yes. 4. Retired now, I get to do pretty much what I want to now....so, yes! 5. Are you kidding?? Sure, I'd like a lodge-style home and pool, etc....but I do very well. In fact, I have too much of a lot of things. So, yes!!
I am extremely grateful at any given time. Thank you God!!
I went to a church service (different church from the one I belong to) in Portland, and the minister began the sermon:
"I want you all to really understand that God's love, the Holy Trinity's love, is unconditional..........
......BUT......." He paused, and finally there were a few chuckles in the audience, then outright laughter. The focus of his sermon was a bit whimsical, but everybody understood. If it is unconditional, there is no "but" about it. You can't have it both ways. I liked the guy.....
Perhaps I might have missed it--but I didn't see a thread regarding the passing of musician Gordon Lightfoot. Sure was right there on top--one of my lifetime favorites......great singer and guitarist......
If a woman is unable or unwilling to provide for herself there are still thousands of men who want that type of provincial relationship. She would be wrong to want, demand, or expect it from a man who sees a relationship as equal in terms of work, financial stability, and home-duties. This type of provincial woman has many choices that would not negatively impact a man who wants and accepts her desire for that way of life.
The Boat is owned by friends of mine. They always get five stars on their Fish N Chips--funky little cafe, too.....best.....let me know what day you'll be in town---if Wednesday, go to downtown Farmers Market---
Not everyone is as strong as you or I...but I absolutely "get" the gist of what you're saying. I've already given my advice--ignore those pesky downers. It was a suggested topic on here, so I gave my two bits.....the moderators have been lobbied by many CS members already--I don't need to find another social media, and yes, regard everything as a compliment. Thanx for your concern.....
p.s. Out to the wine country on Thurs. with a good friend. We stopped at Umpqua Lighthouse Bakery Cafe--what a groovy place (I had been there only once before) then on the way back to the bay we ate at "The Rose" in Drain--another way cool place. Do you get out to these places? The Elk were out in large colonies--many with calves. Nice, nice day.
Hey Stan--nice visit a few weeks ago---yeah, I guess you're right about the 'thumbs' feature. But some of us (CS) have been discussing it lately, and it really doesn't do any good to try and figure it out--like I said awhile ago--it's cowardice--the 'downers' get to be a bully and hide...best to just not let it interfere with the script and conversations we're having with decent people. Annoying--yes--but it seems it's going to go on, so just ignore.....
there is at least one case in The United States where spiking a drink was determined to be attempted murder. Not groovy---in all states it is a felony (Federal crime) to do this.
I get where you're going with this, but there are some very nice, but frail people who are hurt by this completely unfair insulting--the "downer" gets to be mean anonymously. That's cowardice.
Interesting comments regarding the "thumbs", and thank you to all who have recognized the negativity. I'm really doing well not taking it personally--and, awhile ago, a very nice (but sadly, ill) lady member on here was getting "thumbs down" for virtually every post she commented on, and her outlook was bright, optimistic, and encouraging to everyone, in spite of her own sorrows. Mean people suck. Period. A good adage, coined by Dr. Seuss:
"Always be who you are because the people who matter don't mind, and the people who mind don't matter"
my advice is to just ignore any of the "thumbs" up or down----it's rather sophomoric, anyway, to use them and/or be influenced by them. Just say what you have to say, mean it, try to be able to stand by it, and ignore those silly little emoticons. (you can't do anything about them, anyway. They're a non-issue)
Not everything is "set in stone". The belief that the immediate next-of-kin gets everything is not always true. Often, in a second marriage, the children of either or both new married are included in the will, and often, say, there are six survivors (a spouse and kids) the inheritance is divided equally six ways. It depends on the person who made out the will, and if it was a community property state. Not all states are.
For a long time I wondered and pondered this---I guess I side on the "attention" factor--she likely was doing this to other guys. Who knows---yeah, she got a free 5* dinner, flowers, chocolates....why not, . (It did something awful to my trust in people....I sadly admit, and not just ladies, but everyone. Thanx for your post and understanding.
RE: What about prince Harry’s children Archie and Lilibet
Sure. And I'll sell you The Brooklyn Bridge. Yeah.........