In America, after we slaughtered and rounded up the indiginous people, the American Indian, after a hundred years or so people started feeling remorseful. To a degree. It's now to the point where people claim "I'm part Indian" as a form of pride. As if those that they slaughted were now to be held in reverence. Or admired.
Israel makes up its own rules and expects the international community to cave in to their perspective.
This won't float. It didn't in pre war Germany and it won't today.
Might does not make right.
The pen is mightier than the sword.
The world IS watching.
I am not the only voice here. Just the only voice to raise
these issues.
Yes there are two perspectives. And I will concede that the truth does lie somewhere between the two camps.
With respect to terrorism. Its all symantics. When you pen a people up and force then to jump through hoops every day and if they resist then you shoot them, what would you expect? Rockets, AK 47s, suicide bombers? So is this the "poke in the ribs" you speak of?
Is Palistine bent on global domination? Do they have nuclear weapons, and do they refuse to let United Nations inspectors view their facilities?
Israel has endured persecution. Why?
What has been , historically, the motivation for this oppression?
Is posting phallic symbols like you and Connie do stay in theme with my positions on "disproportional retaliation" and collective punishment? And land grab contrary to international law?
SilverBirch Forum Posts (3,158)
RE: Colonisation of Palestine (acceptable or unacceptable)
In America, after we slaughtered and rounded up the indiginous people, the American Indian, after a hundred years or so people started feeling remorseful. To a degree.It's now to the point where people claim "I'm part Indian" as a form of pride.
As if those that they slaughted were now to be held in reverence.
Or admired.
I wonder,...