after the elections there were some riots happening as rebellion to sarkozky winning...for me it just shows that royal was beeing voted by people that dont know how to deal with failing . such minority expect too much and instead of beeing educated they make things worst....showing the world that there is a reason for them to be descriminated. they are agressive and show it and think that beeing agressive will show what they want in a better way...
I dont agree - 47% of voters voted for Sego and only a bunch of rioters in Paris were involved. So how can you say that Sego 'was being voted by people who dont know how to deal with failing'. oo broad a categorisation, no?T
But the rioters have gone. This Sarkozy will not be gone for another five - maybe 10 - years. We will see how he does. Time will show.
u missunderstood me.... my critic goes to the same rioters ...not that she was only voted by them...am just saying that the rioters shouldnt have acted with violence...
"""This Sarkozy will not be gone for another five - maybe 10 - years.""" thats my point...by showing agressivity doesnt chabge it!!!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).