What about Hillary Clinton? (71)
Indyfella: I think he just tried to avoid problems...
JMO
JMO
Isn't that what we all try to do?
------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: If the economy was already on a down hill slide, would it be great if his sucessors worried a bit more about it? Do you think that Bush went after peace or after oil in the Middle East? Did he bring you some peace to your pocket or neighbourhood?
WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT
I'm sorry for the typos, mistakes and...
------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: If the economy was already on a down hill slide, would it be great if his sucessors worried a bit more about it? Do you think that Bush went after peace or after oil in the Middle East? Did he bring you some peace to your pocket or neighbourhood?
there has'nt been a piece in my nieghborhood for some time now....
thats why i'm here
...j/k------ This thread is Archived ------
jlw45: there has'nt been a piece in my nieghborhood for some time now.... thats why i'm here ...j/k
Here where you silly?
CS is our mediation
------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: Would you keep on endorsing McCain or nobody? How about Comunism-socialism for a change? The country is of everybody, the land teoreticaly belongs to everybody but in practice the state does whatever it wants? At least everybody would eat the same and health system would benefit everybody, on top of it, America and Cuba would finally go along and no more wars around the world because capitalism woould be the driving force anymore
If the land belongs to everybody, then it doesn't belong to anybody as I see it.
Property rights are diminishing for a variety of reasons, high property taxes, environmental concerns, eminant domain, etc.
Certainly the "state" should never own it.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Indyfella: If the land belongs to everybody, then it doesn't belong to anybody as I see it.
Property rights are diminishing for a variety of reasons, high property taxes, environmental concerns, eminant domain, etc.
Certainly the "state" should never own it.
Property rights are diminishing for a variety of reasons, high property taxes, environmental concerns, eminant domain, etc.
Certainly the "state" should never own it.
If Property Rights diminish, that's communism getting in slowly. If you mean Property ownership, then that is happening everywhere, don't worry too much
------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: If Property Rights diminish, that's communism getting in slowly. If you mean Property ownership, then that is happening everywhere, don't worry too much
yea, i'm not worried....i can't wait to stand in bread lines while the elite have caviar........... ------ This thread is Archived ------
jlw45: yea, i'm not worried....i can't wait to stand in bread lines while the elite have caviar...........
I wonder if it is the whole capitalism that is ruining you
------ This thread is Archived ------
And come on guys we have your state rights and our federal rights.It is written like that for a reason.Eminent domain was granted by our federal government for each state.And the state can step in and take land if they so choose.But lets think back didn't we do the same to the Indians just take and move them to the side.The government is set up like in cycles.First wash you get is usually county,leading up to state and then to federal.Eminent domain isn't always given or granted.You have rights so use them.
------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: I wonder if it is the whole capitalism that is ruining you
i wish it was .....i just like to go places without hearing....''can i zee your papers''
------ This thread is Archived ------
And come on guys we have your state rights and our federal rights.It is written like that for a reason.Eminent domain was granted by our federal government for each state.And the state can step in and take land if they so choose.But lets think back didn't we do the same to the Indians just take and move them to the side.The government is set up like in cycles.First wash you get is usually county,leading up to state and then to federal.Eminent domain isn't always given or granted.You have rights so use them.[/quote
Step in and take land if they so choose?
Are you talking abou expropriation? It's not that arbitrary
Step in and take land if they so choose?
Are you talking abou expropriation? It's not that arbitrary
------ This thread is Archived ------
jlw45: i wish it was .....i just like to go places without hearing....''can i zee your papers''
------ This thread is Archived ------
Steevyv: Obama for wisdom.
HC, Gates and Jones the best possible choice.
Once again : Obama
HC, Gates and Jones the best possible choice.
Once again : Obama
------ This thread is Archived ------
There is act that Congress passed and applies in some eminent domains.Its called the homestead act.And what it means is you live in a residence and you claim it as your homestead it cannot be taken.The court will not bother to tell you this.But I promise you this let someone try take your home and you inform the court ask it be recorded,that it is your homestead.It cannot be taken.Most of our states honor this,heres hoping you live in one.Its a shortcut to property rights.And you will not be advised of it,you got to bring it out.
------ This thread is Archived ------
0:25:drinking:------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: 0:25
did you mean 6:25?...if so, than we are in agreement------ This thread is Archived ------
cristina: And come on guys we have your state rights and our federal rights.It is written like that for a reason.Eminent domain was granted by our federal government for each state.And the state can step in and take land if they so choose.But lets think back didn't we do the same to the Indians just take and move them to the side.The government is set up like in cycles.First wash you get is usually county,leading up to state and then to federal.Eminent domain isn't always given or granted.You have rights so use them.[/quote
Step in and take land if they so choose?
Are you talking abou expropriation? It's not that arbitrary
Even in this day and age eminent domain exists.In the 50's there was so much land devoping going on.So many easements being granted.As back back as the reservations I will say thats when eminent domain was established.Correct me if I am wrong.It still belongs to each state the decision to use it.Step in and take land if they so choose?
Are you talking abou expropriation? It's not that arbitrary
------ This thread is Archived ------
jlw45: did you mean 6:25?...if so, than we are in agreement
i'm sorry, that was wrong ................................................------ This thread is Archived ------
hillbillyhoney: There is act that Congress passed and applies in some eminent domains.Its called the homestead act.And what it means is you live in a residence and you claim it as your homestead it cannot be taken.The court will not bother to tell you this.But I promise you this let someone try take your home and you inform the court ask it be recorded,that it is your homestead.It cannot be taken.Most of our states honor this,heres hoping you live in one.Its a shortcut to property rights.And you will not be advised of it,you got to bring it out.
eminent domain must be what most call "public interested" whereby private properties may be taken if it is for major public interest utility but always with indemnity involved of course. So you mean that homestead voids any possibility of taken? Gotta read about it tomorrow. It's quite risk if it is just like that. This must be limited to certain kinds of properties, that might be in advance, free of any interest, including the area of location...even so, it's risk to not leave a door for expropriation because you never know what may happen.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
wanting beyond need
The Best of the GOP
the way you look
men's perspective towards women
your personality
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
rarotonga
Common Issues with the BMW X1
Sleepy Don!
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Would you keep on endorsing McCain or nobody? How about Comunism-socialism for a change? The country is of everybody, the land teoreticaly belongs to everybody but in practice the state does whatever it wants? At least everybody would eat the same and health system would benefit everybody, on top of it, America and Cuba would finally go along and no more wars around the world because capitalism woould be the driving force anymore