Environmental Health Group

Environmental Health Group Forum

Discussing Health and Environmental Issues affecting our everyday Well-being and/or Illnesses! Environmental Illnesses (Allergies, Chronic Illnesses, Therapy-resistant Illnesses, Cancer, Depression, Burn-out, ...), EMFs/EMRs (Electromagnetic Fields / Electromagnetic Radiation), Pollution in General, Water Quality, Air Pollution, Noise Pollution, GM (Genetic Manipulation), Recycling, Renewable E... read more

Cancer...... the real truth (3)

Hans4711
Hi Guys,

Back in the mid nineties while living in South Australia I read a small article that was in an Adelaide newspaper. It was not on the front page but listed back on page six and the whole article was probably no larger than about twenty five words..... the article was posted by the Surgeon General's office and it stated that greater than eighty four percent of cancers were caused from industrial fallout.... go figure.

I really wish that I had kept the cutting because it seems that the smokers and tobacco industry have been used as the 'scapegoat' because they can't shut down all industries.

Pollution control measures for industry have been tightened and restrictions for the sale of tobacco have been implemented therefore as smoking is reduced along with pollution from industry it will become evident to the people that it was the smokers that caused all the cancers...

Hans
_Peet_60
True !!!

In he early 1920 Gustav Freiherr von Pohl did his research with WATER VEINS and CANCER and found a definitive link!
In Dec. 1928 to Jan. 1929 he conducted his final test in Vilsbiburg Southern Germany. A mining town where they had plenty of water veins and also plenty of CANCER patients and deaths !

He asked the city council to go through all the death records and list all the names and addresses of the cancer deaths.
Only the last 10 years where available, but this information was enough, to give an almost 100% correlation to the water veins he found in town and indicated on a map, while the city council pulled the records.

Yet up to now CHEMOTHERAPY is the most widely treatment for CANCER, even though it now finally leaked out that CHEMOTHERAPY only has an overall effectivity of under 4%:

"Chemotherapy is a Waste of Money"


- Uploaded by iHealthTube on 18 Jul 2011

Dr. Peter Glidden talks about the incredibly low success rate for chemotherapy as a cancer treatment.
_Peet_60
75% of oncologists wouldn't take chemo ...


- What does THAT say???
Don't they trust their "OWN MEDICATION" ???
Report Abuse for this page, if inappropiate
We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here