i m sorry for ur family and for ur cousin.Many Turkish people lot their families too.I Hope ,this problem will be sorted out soon and people will leave in peace.
Assad's popularity is kind of Stalins popularity. he is a complete a**hole.He should resign himself before any blood.He should see that ,if dont resign or offer new democratic election ,theres gonna be thousands of victims.So why he stayed?he didnt care about his people and his country.he just was caring about his position.I m not supporting other a**hole who r opposing him.I m for someone normal to become in power in Syria.Who is peacefull and democratic.
Coming to Morsi.If he did those crimes,then he has to pay for it.I never liked him and his party anyway.I dont like religon based parties anywhere.I m for secularism.
my friend,if u wanna put down Turkish civilizasion,u need to dig diper.i m sure there r many things u can find which will put them into shame in a way.But remember ,if someone try to dig ur civilizasion there will be much more things that u ll be ashamed of.My point is every civilizasions ,nations,ethnics,culture etc has their bad sides .cos we r all part of human civilizasion and we all almost behave the same.
judging by the comments ,i see that westerners dont like Erdogan for him being religious and they think that he wants to be the leader of all the middle eastern muslims.also he was connected with terrorism and been blamed for supporting Morsi ,disliking Assad.
Erdogan is a religious man.but he never brought up any reigios law.
Erdogans wanting being a leader of the middle east is just a western imagination ,but even if it was true,its not a crime.
Erdogan supports Morsi cos he was a democratically elected of Egypt which unlawfully was overthroned.
Erdogan is against Assad cos he caused 100 k peoples death and his country been completly destroyed.He wasnt democratically elected and had to quit on time when so many people wasnt killed yet.
Erdogan didnt start any war and didnt invide any other country.He improoved his country signiciffantly during his rule
So by these points he seems quite ok to me.
Problems inside Turkey is its inner problem and should be sorted out by Turkish gov and its nation.Erdogan is responsible in front of his nation and will answer for his mistakes to his nation and will not get any votes in next election.Right now he is democraticly elected leader of his country and doing quite well.
i actually dont know much about current going ons but as i know he was supporting Mursi,cos he was the democraticli elected president after decades of Mubaraks rule.If President democraticly elected then its a shame tha army owerthrons it and takes the power.Wasnt Erdogan right?
And he was calling Assad to resign as nation didnt want him.Simple as that.Whats the problem there?
good question.Cos we didnt see them as enemies and werent thinking of war.in 1988 when they started aggression they had plans and guns.but we didnt expect that at all.and we didnt know it will go that far.Otherwise we could push those 200k into Karabakh and its done.thats the proof that we werent agressors but peaceful.
Georgians dont agree with it.there were already those letters in use before him in Georgia and Caucasian Albania.he just collected them together and created an alphabet.
i ll try to be very simple that could explain myself.
that place called armenia by ancient Greeks to identify the place.there were people of many ethnics who lived or came there.a man named Tigran whose origin is not certain ( might be greek or whatever) could manage and made a kingdom.it lasted very short and destroyed.kingdom have been called armenia" cos of the lands name.not the nation's name as there wasnt any armenian nation those times.in different periods of time whoever came to the region called armenia and stayed there automaticly called themselves armenians by the lands name.the comers had nothing related to Tigranes lived there long time ago and his kingdom. But trouble started in 19-20th century when these bunch of comers who were creating armenian nation found that long time ago there was a short lived kingdom armenia.So they started to think that they should steal lands from neighbours and create a big armenia.And that made them to become a chauvinist.all their trouble started with their chavunism based on armenian myth .they will struggle and suffer untill they forget their chavism and become a tolerant nation.
armenian alphabet is questionable too.as i know its common caucasian ethnics alphabet.
i didnt see this post before.so i answer now. thousands of kingdoms existed in the history.that does not mean anything in modern world.That kingdom was named after the land called armenia by greeks.it has nothing to do with todays armenians.and they dont have right to claim the lands shown in imaginary maps.and that kingdom existed only 50-60 years.at that time anyone with a small army could occupy vast lands.and lose it in the first attack by someone else.if u know history u should know that too.i could invade whole India with only 10 k army that times.and keep it untill someone attack there.
dont compare Baku.Baku had twice population than entire Karabakh that times (now much more).And Baku didnt have any skyscrypes at soviet times.one town in Karabakh had about 100 villages so all sums up.
no it cannot be wrong cos many exact numbers were known by soviet documents before the war.And that time Azerbaijan had 7 million population.(today is 9,5) Karabakhs territory is more than 10% of Azerbaijan.so if we divide equally ,u ll see that 600000 is the minimum could be.And take an account that most of Karabakh were villages where people had many childreen in differense than cities where people prefer less childreen.
200 000 expelled from Armenia didnt have any hope to return to armenia so they all got new houses from goverment and are not considered refugees anymore.
probably ur link shows 600000 are displaced from Karabakh.They got new houeses too.by the 2015 all of them will have new houses.But they still be considered refugees cos they belong to Karabakh.
Whatever way u count Azeri refugees from Karabakh they ll be much more than armenians living in Karabakh.That means Karabakh should be returned to Azerbaijan as the majority people of Karabakh want it.Logical ,isnt it?
Thats why Un got 4 resolutions that armenian forces must withdraw unconditionally from occupied zone. So how do u think this conflict should be sorted?Currently 600000 people r waiting to return their homelands.How about their human rights?all of their loved ones gravestones are there,they r not able to visit.So when u talk about humanity u should take everything into account.
Leo_7 Forum Posts (2,514)
RE: Do you follow the news about Turkey?
u think russian prisons are any better?come on exept western european and scandinavian prisons,all the prisons in the world are bad and most of them ,way worse than Turkish prison.