Alex_D Forum Posts (7)

RE: The true job of the US Military.

Actually I never said oil... I said birdseed. Because in reality it could be anything. Hence, the country named widgetland. And it could be anywhere, hence the abrupt name chance to widgetstan.

RE: The true job of the US Military.

So you don't believe behavior modification is akin to mind control. I would disagree. we as human beings in the USA are generally no more able to think freely than was pavlov's dog. and if you think Mcdonalds doesnt have anything to do with behavior modification flip on your TV and watch a few comercials and suddenly you will realize that there is some product out there that you don't have. You will realize that you need one, go out and buy it, and a month later you'll find it collecting dust in your home somewhere and wonder why you bought it in the first place. THE ANSWER: The TV told you to do it.

RE: OIL, IS WAR ABOUT OIL

IS WAR ABOUT OIL? that depends on the perspective. If you are the US the answer is sometimes. for the US it's about whatever we need and someone else has. Really it's bigger than that but in response to your question, that's the general Idea. As to the broad perspective on why we go to war at all... The answer is MONEY. Because War is profitable for banks and corperations and makes these political candidates who have corprate interests in R&D companies and other such things, a lot of MONEY. Which they use to fund political candidates who agree, or will take MONEY to agree with their own interests. But even bigger than that, the reasons we go to war also have to do with the desires of the robber barons that have been in power since the napoleanic war. They own the banks who finance both sides of every conflict we see today . In the end it all comes down to MONEY...And OIL...and a desire for absolute dominance of every living soul on the planet. I know that seems overly dramatic but do your own research and you'll find I may be right.

RE: The true job of the US Military.

This whole statement is very true. I just think it's laughable that america goes around fabricating enemies in order to enact it's global policies in support of US interests. Then they sell it to the US people on the evening news, and most people buy into it without even checking the facts. The truth is, no matter where we are in the world, or why we say we are there...we are not there in the interests of defending or creating democracy elsewhere. When US politicians refer to creating democracy in other countries, they are actually using a softer phrase that means behavior modification. They talk about winning hearts and minds, that means enforcing the compliance of the indigeneous population. That doesn't mean we care about those people. We don't. We just want their resourses for our own use. As long as the US is the only one who can dictate to the rest of the world what is to be considered "unacceptabe behaviour" this will continue. And we as a people will keep buying into it as long as they can find some local they paid 500 american dollars to, who will get in front of a camera for CNN and tell you how relieved he is that the great america stepped into to "champion his human rights" and bring in "democracy". What this man is saying is True people... but the reasons behind it are a whole lot darker than they make it sound on TV.

RE: The true job of the US Military.

The Role of the US military everywhere in the world is to enact political policy when politics will not work. That is to say, If the US needs for instance... bird seed, and the country of widgetland has a whole lot of it, they will try to broker a deal . If that doesn't work the job of the military is to go take over the nessecary facilities of that country. That means TV Radio sattelite communications, major roads,airports, train stations, bus stations andsea ports are put under the control of The US military. Thats why the US Army is the largest army in the world. They need the man power to run this infrastructure. So then we play the waiting game with them politically, we cut off all trade because they weren't very nice to us by not giving us bird seed. (nevermind that we have a whole bunch of birdseed lying around, we need someone elses because that's the american way) anyhow so no trade and no normal operations for a week or 2 ,or 10 years whatever it takes. eventually the people of widgitstan get fed up and decide to take small arms and fire on these american troops who invaded their land for some bird seed we don't need, all because the price widgitstan charged was 15 dollars too high, and that's just unreasonable highway robbery. (mind you we need that extra 15 dollars for bail out funds and fighting terror) so any how after this incident of three guys with rifles shooting at an american Tank and missing, we cue up footage of that on the 5 o'clock news and call it, "sectarian violence". Oh and by the way after the Tank launched a couple of depleted uranium rounds into a local cafe in retaliation that footage hits the morning news and you get to hear about that car bomb that exploded because of those damn terrorist cells. Back to my point, once the people get a taste of that tank shell, (oops I mean "Car Bomb") they are so dejected that they decide the 15 extra dollars wasn't worth the trouble and the american politicians tell them to go shove it unless they give us a real bottom dollar deal. like 2 cents a ton or something. So widgetland complies, troops pull out we get their birdseed, and widgetstan is a fine upstanding ally of the US for all their help with the birdseed . And thats how it works in the real world people

RE: do men think single moms really have a chance

I think single moms have a better chance than most at finding a good man. personally i'd rather have a relationship with a woman who has kids.Women with children seem to be more grounded in reality and focused on the idea of actually having a good relationship. Even though, sometimes, the duties of motherhood might get in the way of a good time. It's worth it not to have to worry about unwanted drama

RE: Which political leader would be best suited to run the world under globalism?

The answer is really simple. You are wasting your time on any belief that you will have any say in who runs anything. It's laughable. when it comes to that point the people with the power will be the same people with real power now. They will appoint a leader as they see fit. You will of course get to "vote" on it, because they keep you under control with the illusion of your ability to have control. I agree entirely that global government is coming but the leader we will see in power will be the one who is most in line with the desires of the banks and corporations and is willing to do as he or she is told by those entities.