Hard to Get..... (32)
The upfront type for a bit of fun
The shy and retiring type for something serious
The shy and retiring type for something serious
Bellysgonnagetya: The upfront type for a bit of fun
The shy and retiring type for something serious
The shy and retiring type for something serious
thats me feked so,
I couldnt be shy and retiring, is not my nature and am always myself.
Maybe its just me but i would see the shy and retiring type as being decent for some reason
Bellysgonnagetya: Maybe its just me but i would see the shy and retiring type as being decent for some reason
aw? what do you mean decent? Bellysgonnagetya: Maybe its just me but i would see the shy and retiring type as being decent for some reason
Ok
As I have said I am not shy have never been. I am very outgoing and chatty. Is that seen as a fault? Would you perceive me to be not decent because of it?
I am genuinely curious about this.
Bellysgonnagetya: Maybe its just me but i would see the shy and retiring type as being decent for some reason
Well I am NOT shy and I am NOT retiring.
But I'm a pretty good girlfriend, when I'm in love with someone.
I mean, it's only a certain type of person that could love me, someone nuts.
But although I always maintain to thine own self be true, I think it's important to maybe hold back a little at the start. See how things pan out.
I unfortunately think this, due to experience.
vonney: OkAs I have said I am not shy have never been. I am very outgoing and chatty. Is that seen as a fault? Would you perceive me to be not decent because of it?
I am genuinely curious about this.
I am genuinely curious about this.
i agree with you vonney, ur quiet like me in that sence, id be curious too
vonney: Ok I get that but my question is do you see a woman who is outgoing and not shy as not decent>
Some women, u know the type i`m on about slappers
Bellysgonnagetya: Some women, u know the type i`m on about slappers
So women fall into to groups for you
Shy and retiring or slappers?
vonney: So women fall into to groups for you
Shy and retiring or slappers?
Shy and retiring or slappers?
I think his wording was off but I get the psyche.
But I know from all my lad friends.....
Girls that tell a lad they are mad about them, from the getgo are seen as too easy.
If I like someone, male or female, I'm vocal about it.
So now I'm pondering if I should just succumb to the age old Hard to Get method.
Not that I'd be that hard to get, few pints and all that!
vonney: So women fall into to groups for you
Shy and retiring or slappers?
Shy and retiring or slappers?
ah lookit am not gettin in to this now
Hoovers: I play hard to get.......and it works.....I dont get!?
Men arent supposed to play hard to get
we`re supposed to be the ones who club the gals across the head with a bat and drag them towards our cave
Hoovers: I play hard to get.......and it works.....I dont get!?
Do women really pursue lads like that?!
I want me a Heathcliff, all dark brooding and crazy!
In response to: Surprisingly enough, although I don't believe in mind games.
I do think that sometimes the cool approach is better.
Obviously it depends on the individual. I've had one good relationship where I waited for a while, another crap one where I dived right in. All long term... But I wonder if the long tried and tested technique is the best?
I mean you don't wanna spread yourself like Flora and put it all out there like an ejit nor do you want to go over the top and be perceived as a disinterested ice maiden.
I've seen girls chase men and think it's sad. I've seen some go OTT with the H2G approach and lads just lost interest quickly.
So where is the balance? Which do men prefer?*disclaimer, yes I know I flirt with everything with a pulse but those that have my interest, my real interest, are met with a serious side, that I rarely display to my playthings.*
I like a girl who is upfront tells you what she wants and likes i would'nt be interested in the shy retiring type to much work and you never know where you standI do think that sometimes the cool approach is better.
Obviously it depends on the individual. I've had one good relationship where I waited for a while, another crap one where I dived right in. All long term... But I wonder if the long tried and tested technique is the best?
I mean you don't wanna spread yourself like Flora and put it all out there like an ejit nor do you want to go over the top and be perceived as a disinterested ice maiden.
I've seen girls chase men and think it's sad. I've seen some go OTT with the H2G approach and lads just lost interest quickly.
So where is the balance? Which do men prefer?*disclaimer, yes I know I flirt with everything with a pulse but those that have my interest, my real interest, are met with a serious side, that I rarely display to my playthings.*
jimbo79: I like a girl who is upfront tells you what she wants and likes i would'nt be interested in the shy retiring type to much work and you never know where you stand
That is music to my ears.
I couldn't do shy and retiring, ever.
Just not me.
But I often feel around new people (this is when I'm sober) that I have to hold back a bit. Let them run the convo, my sister says that not everyone "gets" my kinda mind, so I have to tread carefully.
I bet they'd be queuing up in the local asylum.
tgwstw: Do women really pursue lads like that?!
I want me a Heathcliff, all dark brooding and crazy!
oooh i saw one once! inlaragh . ahh, he was soo perfect! kept lookign over at me but was with a (nice) chick so i ended up thinking he was crap for looking over. sigh, but god he was yum- like nick cave in his younger days.. I want me a Heathcliff, all dark brooding and crazy!
More Threads
the way you look
men's perspective towards women
Unions support Democrats!
wanting beyond need
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
other can see but not you
your personality
Ladies
Sleepy Don!
The Best of the GOP
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,100 Views
31 Comments
Created: Jul 2009
Last Viewed: 9 hrs ago
Last Commented: Jul 2009
0 Likes
I do think that sometimes the cool approach is better.
Obviously it depends on the individual. I've had one good relationship where I waited for a while, another crap one where I dived right in. All long term... But I wonder if the long tried and tested technique is the best?
I mean you don't wanna spread yourself like Flora and put it all out there like an ejit nor do you want to go over the top and be perceived as a disinterested ice maiden.
I've seen girls chase men and think it's sad. I've seen some go OTT with the H2G approach and lads just lost interest quickly.
So where is the balance? Which do men prefer?
*disclaimer, yes I know I flirt with everything with a pulse but those that have my interest, my real interest, are met with a serious side, that I rarely display to my playthings.*