I recently had a conversation with someone and it got me to thinking... Am i the ONLY one who defines "friends" this way?
let me explain... i believe that the word "friend" is about as over used as the word "love" and thus, both have lost their meaning to a large degree.
basically, if i call someone my friend, i think of him/her as a brother/sister (literally)... i would do ANYTHING (within reason) for a friend, as a result, im not one to call someone a friend until i have decided that the relationship has earned that label. thus it takes me a long time to make friends. but once i do make them the remain there for life.
i hear people all the time, in here saying: "i've met a lot of great friends here" or "you are a dear friend to me" yet these people have never met the person in real life and only know whatever they may say via the internet or phone.
even if you meet someone a few times, do you know them well enough under those circumstances to share intimate personal details about yourself? would any of those people fly out on a moments notice to help you when you need it most? CAN they even afford to fly out?
now im not saying that relationships cant be made over long distances, but im having problems understanding who the can be "close" relationships without the ability to truly get to know each other, and i just dont see how you can do that from thousands of miles away... personally, i call those people acquaintances, but i could never open up to them without personal contact
again i ask... am i the ONLY one who thinks this way????
Well I think most people categorise friendship to a point which may answer part of your question mate. I mean someone you would do almost anything for would perhaps be your best or closest friend. There are also just friends who we get along well with and spend occasional time with, watching the game or going to the bar with etc.
taff1: Well I think most people categorise friendship to a point which may answer part of your question mate. I mean someone you would do almost anything for would perhaps be your best or closest friend. There are also just friends who we get along well with and spend occasional time with, watching the game or going to the bar with etc.
well... that's just it... i dont call those people "friends" ... maybe buddies or acquaintances or co-workers, but not friends....
more importantly, i dont share with them very much about my personal life... yet i've noticed that many of them almost expect it, its almost as if in order to get along you have to open up to them before even knowing them very well !!!
i do open up to people but only AFTER i've gotten to know them well enough to know that i can trust them
MetalMilitia: well... that's just it... i dont call those people "friends" ... maybe buddies or acquaintances or co-workers, but not friends....
more importantly, i dont share with them very much about my personal life... yet i've noticed that many of them almost expect it, its almost as if in order to get along you have to open up to them before even knowing them very well !!! i do open up to people but only AFTER i've gotten to know them well enough to know that i can trust them
I see your point mate, some people do expect info on a grand scale which means their just too nosy. In person I would have to trust somebody to open up yes, which can sometimes take a while.
nicki_loveoriginally from Venus, Port of Spain Trinidad and Tobago15 Threads374 Posts
nicki_loveoriginally from Venus, Port of Spain Trinidad and Tobago374 posts
Hey Metal.. like you, I also have this same theory of friendship! It takes a lot for me to call someone a friend! There have been many people who I have met here who wants to call themselves my friend, and some get offended when I question the term. I like meeting people and I meet quite a lot. But to get into my "friend" list, you need to be pretty special! lol.. and that's goes for people I know in person as well!
taff1: I see your point mate, some people do expect info on a grand scale which means their just too nosy. In person I would have to trust somebody to open up yes, which can sometimes take a while.
well... if this had only been an issue once or twice, i'd have dismissed it as an odd occurrence... but it seems like most everyone IS that way !!!
next thing i know they are getting all pissed off at me and saying im too closed off and that i dismiss people easy and that i dont let anyone in.... im like: "duh !! i aint letting ya in just cos YOU say i can trust you, you gotta SHOW me that i can trust ya!!"
nicki_love: Hey Metal.. like you, I also have this same theory of friendship! It takes a lot for me to call someone a friend! There have been many people who I have met here who wants to call themselves my friend, and some get offended when I question the term. I like meeting people and I meet quite a lot. But to get into my "friend" list, you need to be pretty special! lol.. and that's goes for people I know in person as well!
Have a great day
Nyx
well okay... good to know im not the only freak up in here !!!!
still i think we are the overwhelming minority !!!!
Yes, different levels. When it comes to very close friends, the kind you usually keep the rest of your life, it's usually only about 2 or 3.(Takes a lot of time to become that kind of friend).
With casual friends, some are closer than others. Some people like to have loads of casual friends & acquaintances. A real friend, though, whether casual or close, will understand if you don't want to tell your whole life story & details. Some may have the type of personality that don't mind telling everything about themselves to others(& kind of figure everyone else feels the same.) I don't know...some of those you've met, maybe they wanted more info for other reasons. I don't think anyone should try to get someone to tell more about themselves than they feel comfortable with.
The only time real friends try to get you to share more is when they're concerned about you... and are mainly your closer friends.
I don't mind the term "friends" being used in a casual way... though I'd have to have spent some time getting to know them before I'd know if I wanted to be friends. I do think it's possible to have some pretty good friends online. My opinion anyway. ..to someone(OP)I don't know, but seems friendly...
Long distance relationship do give a lot of misunderstanding, trust, responses and feel. I agreed with u in some ways. To me friends can classify into many groups: chatting friend, penpal friend, special friend and intimate friend. Depends on individual, i cant make any comments on these. Is confusing at times as when, how and wat this long distance apart can happen but there is a chance to happen may be veri miniumum percentage provided both are so click and sharing the same views, ideas and exchanges + care/feel. No right or wrong in a relationship but all depends on individual requirements. Wish u the best. Take care
SCatlyn: Yes, different levels. When it comes to very close friends, the kind you usually keep the rest of your life, it's usually only about 2 or 3.(Takes a lot of time to become that kind of friend).
With casual friends, some are closer than others. Some people like to have loads of casual friends & acquaintances. A real friend, though, whether casual or close, will understand if you don't want to tell your whole life story & details. Some may have the type of personality that don't mind telling everything about themselves to others(& kind of figure everyone else feels the same.) I don't know...some of those you've met, maybe they wanted more info for other reasons. I don't think anyone should try to get someone to tell more about themselves than they feel comfortable with.
The only time real friends try to get you to share more is when they're concerned about you... and are mainly your closer friends.
I don't mind the term "friends" being used in a casual way... though I'd have to have spent some time getting to know them before I'd know if I wanted to be friends. I do think it's possible to have some pretty good friends online. My opinion anyway. ..to someone(OP)I don't know, but seems friendly...
well... those real friends of mine would not even ask me to share cos they know that if i need to, i will... and if i dont then i dont need to.... and thats just the point... if someone is concerned about me because i aint getting touchy feely and crying on their shoulder, then they obviously do not know me well
cherrybrandycambridge, Cambridgeshire, England UK7,473 posts
MetalMilitia: well okay... good to know im not the only freak up in here !!!! still i think we are the overwhelming minority !!!!
not minority.. sure,many people will agree..the word "friend"is being misused,for convinience,hence the many kinds of friendships.as for sharing..sometimes its easier to share things with people,you dont really know..
nicki_love: Minority is fine with me!! Really precious gems are rare you know!
Nice to meet you Mr. Minority Leader! lol Can I be the VP Minority?
ok that all sounds sooo corny.. but its only cause I'm sleepy and a bit fiery at the same time!
well... dont think you want any involvement with my movement cos im gettin ready to start a coup up in here which im sure is gonna land me and all my accomplices in the slammer !!!!!
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
let me explain... i believe that the word "friend" is about as over used as the word "love" and thus, both have lost their meaning to a large degree.
basically, if i call someone my friend, i think of him/her as a brother/sister (literally)... i would do ANYTHING (within reason) for a friend, as a result, im not one to call someone a friend until i have decided that the relationship has earned that label. thus it takes me a long time to make friends. but once i do make them the remain there for life.
i hear people all the time, in here saying: "i've met a lot of great friends here" or "you are a dear friend to me" yet these people have never met the person in real life and only know whatever they may say via the internet or phone.
even if you meet someone a few times, do you know them well enough under those circumstances to share intimate personal details about yourself? would any of those people fly out on a moments notice to help you when you need it most? CAN they even afford to fly out?
now im not saying that relationships cant be made over long distances, but im having problems understanding who the can be "close" relationships without the ability to truly get to know each other, and i just dont see how you can do that from thousands of miles away... personally, i call those people acquaintances, but i could never open up to them without personal contact
again i ask... am i the ONLY one who thinks this way????