Obama was new to Washingtion. Bush, Clinton, Regan, Carter. Except for Bush the first, ever notice how long it's been since we elected anyone with a history inside the beltway to the presidency?
It's easier for one of the political parties to put up a candidate that doesn't have the sort of history and baggage that anyone that's actually been in the trenches would have. They're politicians. The more we know about them, the less we're going to like them.
Saint Ron was the exception to that rule, of course. :)
gardenhackle: It's easier for one of the political parties to put up a candidate that doesn't have the sort of history and baggage that anyone that's actually been in the trenches would have. They're politicians. The more we know about them, the less we're going to like them.
Saint Ron was the exception to that rule, of course. :)
I raise the question cause I've always wondered who is says more about, us or the polititians, that no one can win by running on their record.
onecountryboy: I raise the question cause I've always wondered who is says more about, us or the polititians, that no one can win by running on their record.
It's not so much that politicians can't run on their record. I think the real problem is that millions of dollars spent to investigate and millions more spent to create propaganda from the results of the investigation makes it easy enough to put together a hard hitting smear campaign that can sway enough people to win elections handily. Campaigns are won by he who was able to best shield himself from the tarring and feathering and a lot of times, that's going to be the guy who hasn't accomplished anything. You can't do anything wrong if you don't do anything at all.
onecountryboy: Obama was new to Washingtion. Bush, Clinton, Regan, Carter. Except for Bush the first, ever notice how long it's been since we elected anyone with a history inside the beltway to the presidency?
I've a BIT of Bad news for you Ole Chap, it's NOT going to happen this time either !
i think they(CEO'S AND MAIN SHAREHOLDERS) elect the one who promises more to our multinational corporations interests; it sounds logic. IF YOU MAKE LEGISLATION TO MAKE THE MOST OUT OF OUR FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO YOUR CAMPAING WE MAKE YOU THE PRESIDENT OF THIS COUNTRY. it's all about projectability in maximizing share holder's value "IT'S A WIN-WIN SITUATION"(exept if you are the average citizen)
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Bush, Clinton, Regan, Carter.
Except for Bush the first, ever notice how long it's been since we elected anyone with a history inside the beltway to the presidency?