Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to
report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
- at the moment, the Hungarian border got a lot of coverage, ie the confrontations. You would not see women and children in such footage, they will have moved well away very fast
- some may have been given what the family could afford, in a bet to get one of their sons out to a friendly country, able bodied and thus with a better chance to make that journey, in hopes that once the young men have reached safety, they will get a chance to find ways to bring their families over without them having to ride tiny boats and in uncertainty of where to find shelter on the way
- fear of being drawn into the violent conflict, which would speak in favour of many of them not being violent and trying to avoid having to pick up arms
I am highly suspicious of what leads to these wars and why some people are left to starve in African nations, with no call to take them in, but this does not mean I do not feel for those who I watch fleeing, because we do know there IS war, unless we wish to say that's all false, no war there, Hollywood fake fighting shown to us, but no matter how suspicious I can be, I don't know the war there is a media lie.
Irish people and many people in Europe fled bad social conditions, aiding the demise of the Native American way of life. Were those Irish young men in the wrong too, when they tried to seek a chance to build a life away from oppression and little hope? Do we not feel sympathy when confronted with their history, even though it did mean devastation for Native tribes (a danger we are not facing)?
As I said over and over, I hate what is happening and question motives behind it, but not the motives of those fleeing, or their rightful claim to our sympathy and aid.