Good Morning and thank you but I do not need to post and/or delete anything. Unless, I misinterpreted your last comment, and you were only suggesting an example for me to view?
Thanks for commenting. I am pretty sure that your first sentence is accurate.
And even though the OP didn't allow comments, I'm sure that he/she HAS seen and PROBABLY is following this very blog.
Also, comments have been posted IN RESPONSE to the OP's original blog/rant - just in a different blog/location.
Obviously, the OP wanted to make a statement (or rant) that was NOT meant to be very obvious about what or who was being referenced.
Baically, accomplishing remaining somewhat annonymous to ALL CS members and somewhat an "encrypted" message.
The OP IS now aware that the blog has now been addressed by the member who the blog/rant referred to.
The OP has never privately contacted this member directly in regards to the issue, ultimately, avoiding dialogue while remaining "behind the curtains", so to speaK.
Choosing this method is not breaking any CS rules. It is clearly understood that the OP is entitled to use this technique on his/her blog.
I just wanted to comment that it is very nice and refreshing to know that you and him are both trusting of each other. Having trust is essential in a relationSHIP and without it, the relationSHIP does NOT work.
I'm very happy for you and wish you both the best of luck.
You are a wise man and once again, another great point. Truth is, when a situation as such arises, we will never know the truth or reason and that is ultimately the premeditated intention.
Who know's, maybe it is for the best!? It's not my preference or style, because if I'm going to "call someone out", I would like to hear their explanation simply because of the possibility of having misinterpreted the facts.
Thank you. I constantly go back and forth questioning myself but now that I am older and wiser, I've learned, more often than not, my instincts are right. As for you to reaffirm, means a lot! You're a good friend, always have been. I appreciate you.
iotaoo - I have considered those reasons myself and to me, the first reason ("A") you listed, is selfish and cowardly. I would like to think that it doesn't pertain, but my instinct is telling me otherwise, but could be wrong.
We are surrounded by them online and offline. There is no where to hide from the wolves. It's unfortunate but true. I'm not claiming to be perfect, by all means, but I TRY my best to be a good person. I am not a malicious person and I am always willing to help the less fortunate however and whenever I can but I also know that I have to be consciencious of my actions and behavior on a regular basis. I know that I have my good days and my bad days just like the rest of us.
Ccincy, I absolutely agree that there is much more serious things in the world to be concerned with. All of which you stated and much more. I also agree and stated so in my original post, that we are all entitled and that I respect that but at the same time, I don't clearly understand the logic. Not that I'm bashing, just simply curious.
I agree with you and we are all human and we are all unique. Not everyone is always going to agree with one another. After all, at the end of the day, no one is perfect and we all have flaws. We all have to accept this fact and do the best we can and that's what makes the world go 'round in my opinion. I just don't understand the logic of one to "call someone out" and then not allow a response/dialogue? Catch my drift?
No Comments Allowed
@PedalGood Morning and thank you but I do not need to post and/or delete anything. Unless, I misinterpreted your last comment, and you were only suggesting an example for me to view?