A good country which Mr Mugabe has trasformed in paradise is Zimbabue or Swaziland,why don't you go and live there. Oh by the way in Swaziland,when you are the King,how many virgins,is he allowed to have????.- If for you the best for Africa is to have Kings and Chiefs,it seems to me,that you are lacking any political thinking.-
And the King comes from one tribe and kill the people of the opposite tribes.Like the Zulu King eliminating all the other Chiefs or Kings and their people,wonderful......
I lived in Africa for 22 years, and you are so blind,you cannot see that most of the leaders in Africa,cannot put their house in order. I will suggest,you go and live in countries like Zimbabue,Malawi,etc,and when you come back(if you come back,crime rate you know)you tell us your impressions.
Am just speculating.UN+NATO+Arab League left it too late, to liberate Libyans form Qaddafi.It seems they have given time to Qaddafi to be in control again if his tanks are in the outskirts or maybe inside Benghazi.
Don't know if the scenario they have in mind is similar to Iraq,but reading the history of Libya,could be like this.Libya has tribal lords like Afghanistan, and west tribal lords don't like the east ones and vice versa.-So splitting the country in 2 countries,east and west is a good scenario,and you may ask WHY??? what they have to gain,certainly not the Sahara sand.
My view on Libya,always has been for military internvention,under a UN mandate,with forces from Nato,the Arab League,or any other country willing to partake military,so the rights of the Libyan people, WHO and HOW they want to be governed, to be restored.
Its how to achieve the end result is important,defeating Qaddafi's forces.-You cannot destroy a tank with a stick.- They need military help and needed right now, pride alone will not defeat Qaddafi's forces.-
I will not say "Dragged" if the allied forces go in,get rid of Qaddafi,allow the Libyan people to decide how and who is governing them,and leave straight away.
The rebellion against an autocratic,despotic,dictaror Qaddafi and some of his sons,is the wish of the people of Libya to get rid off,not the wish of UK and France.Also in democratic countries,like UK and France, the wishes of the prople are paramount,and this is exactly what UK,France,and other countries supporting.-They support the wishes of the Libyans to get rid of Qaddafi.-
English is an amalgam by about 50% Greek + Latin,some German and French,the rest of it,don't know.The English language looks to me,like a very big pot of soup,with all existing past and present veges(languages) inside.
If they agree to disagree in politics,and politics is a subject they will mutually agreed,not to talk about in private and in puplic,then why not for a second date.
Never mind all the CSiers,and the rest of the world,what your self DO about it,on the subject of your thread???? so,we, the ignorant,can follow on your footsteps.
Just be yourself on a date, and talk what is of inderest to you. Now if not familiar with the subject, your date talking about,without offending him,direct the discussion to a subject, you know about.Its not very polite and not clever at all,a man on a first date,to be engaged talking to his date,on mechanical matters,while his date,does not have a clue on the subject.JMO
chris27292729 Forum Posts (15,811)
RE: West moves towards Libya action
Yes i have changed my mind.