‘Age of the Earth’ Discussion

Amiable Christian ‘Age of the Earth’ Discussion

by Power Point Paradise • May 11, 2015

The Christian panel are sweetly trying to keep “Christian Unity.” Of course “Christian unity” is not necessarily the same thing as “Here by shall all men know that ye are my disciples if ye love one another”, nor Jesus prayer that we all shall be ONE with Him and the Father.

Even Paul disagreed with Peter tremendously, but it seems from Scripture that Peter meekly accepted Paul’s correction. Paul at other times was definitely out of sorts with his friend Barnabas that his argument got so heated that they split apart. Paul was a fighter for what he believed in, and it took that kind of man to keep the early rot out or at least in check from an early church.

Hope you enjoyed that as much as I did. I enjoyed it as this is my field and even though I hate to identify myself as a YEC because of philosophical reasons not to be a reactionary to Darwinist lies, I know there is no leg to stand on for OEC. Old Eearth Darwnists would disagree of course, because of their religious beliefs.

I tend to agree with Stephen Meyer that the first thing to support is the existence of God, and I love to use Intelligent Design as a tool, especially DNA is a great witnessing tool to help young people believe, if they were stumbled by Darwinists or Atheists.

But I think that History is a neglected field of proof where as more and more evidence is actually appearing from that quarter like the “scientificality” of the Flood, the causes of the Flood, Flood geology, Astronomy supporting the age of the pyramids and the early Egyptians and Sumerians having mapped the stars and the earth, as shown by the prehistoric maps like Piri Reis and others.

As well as the REAL timing of the Ice Age as proven by proper Euhemerist dating of the sinking of the Bronze Age ruins by the Ice Age melting all over the world around 1500 BC, acc. to many historical legends (like the Mahabharata), seed research by Finkelstein, and much more evidence –as seen in our many articles on the subject– which makes Darwinians cringe inside and even drop that (sunken ruins) part of the conversation and drop the research as a hot potatoe! It is so convincing, that even New Age historians, like Hancock for example, become obvious Darwinian compromisers effectively.

Flood geology has become so much stronger through the research in Colorado University proving that the “Evolutionary” Geological Time Scale” is way too long – 99 % too long! (See our post on that in search)

I tend to agree with the last speaker about believers being embarrassed or intimidated by the Darwinian propaganda machine. I also agree with him that the Word of God speaks for itself about the approximate Age of the Earth, but also with Stephen Meyer that it is the last reasoning we should use in conversation with unbelievers!

Nobody doubts the timing of Jesus 4 BC – 30 AD. No one doubts the Babylonian captivity around 600 BC. Few Christians doubt the time of David around 1000 BC. And few Christians doubt the approximate timing of the Exodus around 1400 BC (give or take) or the timing of Abraham around 2000 BC.

The timing of the Flood however, is of course not that obvious or clear, even in Scripture, and there are several different estimates ranging from before 3000 BC up to around 2345 BC. However the Flood — no matter what the exact date may be– is still a great tool to lead people to a proper new ‘time paradigm instead of the failing “millions of years” mindset! The Flood has many arguments in store to win people over to faith in Genesis, which is very important in the longer run, as it theoretically could stumble Darwinian trained believers — which most of us were– from believing Genesis believing Jesus Himself!




PPP TFI [Posted Video - Should Christians Divide over the Age of the Earth]