Where is Sarah Palin? (348)
Conrad73: Sure glad there are no Leftie-Think Tanks,or are there?
I am not even a leftist, sorry, son. I can be close to Albert Camus and its rejection of both. 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Actractorguy: I am a conservative in my personal life. As far as Palin goes To me she is not Presidential material. No one that wants to run for president is IMHO.
I do take offense at you saying that she could not understand the if she just pushed a glass off the table that she would be too stupid to understand that the result would be a broken glass that now needs to be cleaned up. Here is how the politics is in the US
It's two sides of the same coin. They are all run by the same group and just use the moniker of Democrat or Republican and spit out what ever the boss tells them.
I agree with you again about the last part of your post. I want to know why you take offense at my metaphor about Palin and the broken glass. I would like to know.Am I offending a whole culture or just a way of thinking behind an ideology? I would like to hear that from someone like you.I do take offense at you saying that she could not understand the if she just pushed a glass off the table that she would be too stupid to understand that the result would be a broken glass that now needs to be cleaned up. Here is how the politics is in the US
It's two sides of the same coin. They are all run by the same group and just use the moniker of Democrat or Republican and spit out what ever the boss tells them.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: I am not even a leftist, sorry, son. I can be close to Albert Camus and its rejection of both.
So you too only exist because you Rebel?
------ This thread is Archived ------
SilverBirch: Hey Boyz!
Hi mate!!! I hope you are ok and doing well.------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: So you too only exist because you Rebel?
Yes, I prefer that to the certainty of believing in certain gods. That is more comfortable and I have done it, son. Camus defended that innate rebeliousness in humn beings. I just have to defend mine.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: I agree with you again about the last part of your post. I want to know why you take offense at my metaphor about Palin and the broken glass. I would like to know.Am I offending a whole culture or just a way of thinking behind an ideology? I would like to hear that from someone like you.
It might be similiar to saying Obama couldn't give a speech if his teleprompter got knocked over.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: I never did. Sorry, I just observe your ways of thinking and have a go at your ...limitations...
I never said that she was responsible or not. I just said that if she pushed a glass over the table she would never understand the connection of it to the broken glass.
She is just a plain dumb human being, a good representation of how rotten your right is, something you probably admire.
I never said that she was responsible or not. I just said that if she pushed a glass over the table she would never understand the connection of it to the broken glass.
She is just a plain dumb human being, a good representation of how rotten your right is, something you probably admire.
Then please give us your thought on her Tuscon Tragedy address:
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: So you too only exist because you Rebel?
.....and you right,Palin definitely is no POTUS Material!------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: .....and you right,Palin definitely is no POTUS Material!
But then,neither is Hillary!------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: I would bloody believe so
Whatever dude Antjo................
------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: I agree with you again about the last part of your post. I want to know why you take offense at my metaphor about Palin and the broken glass. I would like to know.Am I offending a whole culture or just a way of thinking behind an ideology? I would like to hear that from someone like you.
There you said metaphor. That clears up a bit of misunderstanding on my part.
Now for the ideology. I see it like this Every person that wears pants puts them on the exact same way. I don't fall for the my side is better than your side of the crap. Politics are used to separate the people just as religion is. It's all bs and I don't fall for it. I pick the person I believe will cast their votes in congress or the senate that corresponds to the closest to my ideals.
Did you know that when the US Constitution was written that the Senators were elected by the State legislature from the state they represented. It was done that way so the States would have a say in the Federal Government. It was changed by the 17th Amendment.
Article 1 Section 3
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, (chosen by the Legislature thereof,) (The preceding words in parentheses superseded by the 17th Amendment, section 1.) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
AMENDMENT XVII
Passed by Congress May 13, 1912. Ratified April 8, 1913.
Note: Article I, section 3, of the Constitution was modified by the 17th Amendment.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
This Amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Nope,just a personal Opinion!
I am leaning more toward the Libertarians!
I am leaning more toward the Libertarians!
For the international community, he didn't say "librarians".
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Nope,just a personal Opinion!
I am leaning more toward the Libertarians!
I am leaning more toward the Libertarians!
Yes I am of that leaning also. I choose to research a candidate before making any decision. That goes for any of them. From the local school board member to the President of the US. I never bother with the rhetoric the parties spit out.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ttom500: Then please give us your thought on her Tuscon Tragedy address:
Let me do my own research, ask some people elsewhere and then I will say something. I know Palin did not instigate this madman personally, but I also know how powerful propaganda can hit the head of people in your country (particularly), including the one of a "leftist" weirdo.------ This thread is Archived ------
leigh2154: Whatever dude Antjo................
How horrible...a hateful and spiteful woman. Wish you luck with the gentlemen...------ This thread is Archived ------
Actractorguy: There you said metaphor. That clears up a bit of misunderstanding on my part.
Now for the ideology. I see it like this Every person that wears pants puts them on the exact same way. I don't fall for the my side is better than your side of the crap. Politics are used to separate the people just as religion is. It's all bs and I don't fall for it. I pick the person I believe will cast their votes in congress or the senate that corresponds to the closest to my ideals.
Did you know that when the US Constitution was written that the Senators were elected by the State legislature from the state they represented. It was done that way so the States would have a say in the Federal Government. It was changed by the 17th Amendment.
Article 1 Section 3
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, (chosen by the Legislature thereof,) (The preceding words in parentheses superseded by the 17th Amendment, section 1.) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
AMENDMENT XVII
Passed by Congress May 13, 1912. Ratified April 8, 1913.
Note: Article I, section 3, of the Constitution was modified by the 17th Amendment.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
This Amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
I do not say metaphor to lessen the meaning. It is jsut a way to represent her inability to connect facts. A capacity that is very useful for their purposes. Now for the ideology. I see it like this Every person that wears pants puts them on the exact same way. I don't fall for the my side is better than your side of the crap. Politics are used to separate the people just as religion is. It's all bs and I don't fall for it. I pick the person I believe will cast their votes in congress or the senate that corresponds to the closest to my ideals.
Did you know that when the US Constitution was written that the Senators were elected by the State legislature from the state they represented. It was done that way so the States would have a say in the Federal Government. It was changed by the 17th Amendment.
Article 1 Section 3
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, (chosen by the Legislature thereof,) (The preceding words in parentheses superseded by the 17th Amendment, section 1.) for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote.
AMENDMENT XVII
Passed by Congress May 13, 1912. Ratified April 8, 1913.
Note: Article I, section 3, of the Constitution was modified by the 17th Amendment.
The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote. The electors in each State shall have the qualifications requisite for electors of the most numerous branch of the State legislatures.
When vacancies happen in the representation of any State in the Senate, the executive authority of such State shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies: Provided, That the legislature of any State may empower the executive thereof to make temporary appointments until the people fill the vacancies by election as the legislature may direct.
This Amendment shall not be so construed as to affect the election or term of any Senator chosen before it becomes valid as part of the Constitution.
Thanks for the post.
------ This thread is Archived ------
I think that used that one......several weeks ago, I do charge for copywrite infringements.....[/quote 
Sorry....
Sorry....------ This thread is Archived ------
Antjo39: Let me do my own research, ask some people elsewhere and then I will say something. I know Palin did not instigate this madman personally, but I also know how powerful propaganda can hit the head of people in your country (particularly), including the one of a "leftist" weirdo.
Maybe confer with the Daily Kos.
------ This thread is Archived ------
leigh2154: Strong words for someone hiding behind a mask!!!!!!
You are pathetic. This is just a joke. I don't care if he betrays this or that...Mask? what is my mask mind you? Uncover me to make me and other people laugh... I am not new here, so please do a basic research before trying to bring ridiculous arguments against me.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
What's going on
The world is as you see
What I Lack In Vocabulary
everything is changing
Icebergs Still Around
Heavy Bass In The PM
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Reality Check
Nature
Wondering
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
I never said that she was responsible or not. I just said that if she pushed a glass over the table she would never understand the connection of it to the broken glass.
She is just a plain dumb human being, a good representation of how rotten your right is, something you probably admire.
I am a conservative in my personal life. As far as Palin goes To me she is not Presidential material. No one that wants to run for president is IMHO.
I do take offense at you saying that she could not understand the if she just pushed a glass off the table that she would be too stupid to understand that the result would be a broken glass that now needs to be cleaned up.
Here is how the politics is in the US
It's two sides of the same coin. They are all run by the same group and just use the moniker of Democrat or Republican and spit out what ever the boss tells them.