Envy51: What is your opinion on the controversial issuing of gagging orders in the British Courts to top sport and TV stars who have cheated on their wives or husbands? The ammount of these so called super-injuctions is growing by the day thus creating a back door privacy law that is only accessible to the rich and famous. Do you think the papers have a right to report and publish this sort of stuff or should the stars who are caught dipping their wicks be named and shamed?
what right do papers have to bad mouth any any person that has not broken any laws. let private lives be private,there are plenty of real stories out there to do some real reporting on. my vote is gag them....
altalkback: what right do papers have to bad mouth any any person that has not broken any laws. let private lives be private,there are plenty of real stories out there to do some real reporting on. my vote is gag them....
They have no right....... but what gauls me is it is yet another thing that money can buy, the silence of the press
Envy51: Why do you think that, is that not as good as saying to them or anyone underage who commits murder " you were bold, but we will not tell anyone about you being bold or what you did" should part of the punishment not be having to face a world who knows what you did?
Because the ability to adopt a new identity is small for kids........... The psychologists point the finger at this as being the main reason for their problems now............. No persons name should be released to the press until they are FOUND guilty, NOT WHEN ACCUSED
blarneykite: Because the ability to adopt a new identity is small for kids........... The psychologists point the finger at this as being the main reason for their problems now............. No persons name should be released to the press until they are FOUND guilty, NOT WHEN ACCUSED
I agree with the not naming until they are found guilty
But to say that part of their problem now is the fact that they were not given the chance to adopt a new identity makes a complete balls of the statement "they were bad bad then and they are bad now"........ would a new identity have made them better people, i do not think so somehow B
The first of the super injuctions has been overturned today........... and rightly so IMO
Sir Fred Goodwin formerly Royal Bank of Scotland had his super injuction lifted today. He received the nickname "Fred the Shred" because when he was in charge of the Royal Bank of Scotland he brought the bank down to bankruptcy and it had to be bailed out by £20billion with taxpayers' money.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
What makes two ten year old boys BAD to begin with B, their upbringing or is it in the genes