Name and shame or gag them up? (50)
Envy51Meath, Ireland66 Threads 4 Polls 1,631 PostsWhat is your opinion on the controversial issuing of gagging orders in the British Courts to top sport and TV stars who have cheated on their wives or husbands? The ammount of these so called super-injuctions is growing by the day thus creating a back door privacy law that is only accessible to the rich and famous. Do you think the papers have a right to report and publish this sort of stuff or should the stars who are caught dipping their wicks be named and shamed?
Envy51: What is your opinion on the controversial issuing of gagging orders in the British Courts to top sport and TV stars who have cheated on their wives or husbands? The ammount of these so called super-injuctions is growing by the day thus creating a back door privacy law that is only accessible to the rich and famous. Do you think the papers have a right to report and publish this sort of stuff or should the stars who are caught dipping their wicks be named and shamed?
Why should they be named and shamed any more than the ordinary Joe Soap
I know it sells papers, and we all feel we "know" these people, but are they not entitled to the same privacy as the rest of us JMO
Envy51: What is your opinion on the controversial issuing of gagging orders in the British Courts to top sport and TV stars who have cheated on their wives or husbands? The ammount of these so called super-injuctions is growing by the day thus creating a back door privacy law that is only accessible to the rich and famous. Do you think the papers have a right to report and publish this sort of stuff or should the stars who are caught dipping their wicks be named and shamed?
Yea apers should have the rights to print but only if its true the media have slated and caused alot of pain for people in the past.
id say name and shame them
Glengirl: Why should they be named and shamed any more than the ordinary Joe Soap
I know it sells papers, and we all feel we "know" these people, but are they not entitled to the same privacy as the rest of us JMO
super injuction costs hundred grand just to start proceedings one law for the rich comes to mindI know it sells papers, and we all feel we "know" these people, but are they not entitled to the same privacy as the rest of us JMO
leisure07: super injuction costs hundred grand just to start proceedings one law for the rich comes to mind
That is my take on it too C.......... these stars are buying the silence of the press and as David Cameron said "it is the job of the UK parlament and not the judges who should decide where the right to privacy begins and ends"
gaggin 
i thought this was a gimp thread
gag them and throw them in my dungeoon
im recruitin gimps at the mo
anyone interested
i thought this was a gimp thread
gag them and throw them in my dungeoon
im recruitin gimps at the mo
anyone interested
biggles90000: Yea apers should have the rights to print but only if its true the media have slated and caused alot of pain for people in the past.
Even it it is true Biggs these super-injuctions puts a gag on the press from reporting anything, full stop
What brought this to my notice was the case of Imogen Thomas a former Miss Wales. She had an affair with a married premership football player and the press got hold of it 
the football player applied for a super-injuction which was granted. Miss Imogen was then told if she identified the star or spoke about the affair to the press or anyone she risked being jailed......... there are two laws going on here.... IMO 
blipper2000: gaggin
i thought this was a gimp thread
gag them and throw them in my dungeoon
im recruitin gimps at the mo
anyone interested
maybe start your own thread i thought this was a gimp thread
gag them and throw them in my dungeoon
im recruitin gimps at the mo
anyone interested
irish84: maybe start your own thread
even better
watch this space
blipper2000: even better
watch this space
i want some fun for tonight watch this space
Envy51: Even it it is true Biggs these super-injuctions puts a gag on the press from reporting anything, full stop What brought this to my notice was the case of Imogen Thomas a former Miss Wales. She had an affair with a married premership football player and the press got hold of it the football player applied for a super-injuction which was granted. Miss Imogen was then told if she identified the star or spoke about the affair to the press or anyone she risked being jailed......... there are two laws going on here.... IMO
Envy51: Even it it is true Biggs these super-injuctions puts a gag on the press from reporting anything, full stop What brought this to my notice was the case of Imogen Thomas a former Miss Wales. She had an affair with a married premership football player and the press got hold of it the football player applied for a super-injuction which was granted. Miss Imogen was then told if she identified the star or spoke about the affair to the press or anyone she risked being jailed......... there are two laws going on here.... IMO
I wouldn't be reading those stories, but perhaps it gives the stars some protection from someone just being involved to sell a story afterwards.
Envy51: What is your opinion on the controversial issuing of gagging orders in the British Courts to top sport and TV stars who have cheated on their wives or husbands? The ammount of these so called super-injuctions is growing by the day thus creating a back door privacy law that is only accessible to the rich and famous. Do you think the papers have a right to report and publish this sort of stuff or should the stars who are caught dipping their wicks be named and shamed?
I don't agree with censorship of any type, however there is one side of it that nobody has mentioned.
Maybe it will stop a lot of people who set out to bed a well known star with the intention of selling the story to make loads of money for themselves.
It might, just might leave more families intact.
Don't get me wrong, i know it takes two to tango but there are a lot of money grabbing people out there who will wreck a marriage to make a fortune.
wittyone: It wasn't me N I swear
Does the Cavan man play football or any kind of ball games?
Envy51: Does the Cavan man play football or any kind of ball games?
Indeed he does, keeps him fit
a bit off topic but a name and shame none the less
blumoon: a bit off topic but a name and shame none the less
I have a few on here i wouldnt mind gagging
biggles90000: I have a few on here i wouldnt mind gagging
i have a couple on this site i wouldnt mind doing More Threads
your personality
everything is changing
How far is too far?
Nature
other can see but not you
Salami, Salami, Baloney
Sleepy Don!
rarotonga
Common Issues with the BMW X1
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
2,101 Views
49 Comments
Created: May 2011
Last Viewed: May 1
Last Commented: May 2011
0 Likes