Just wondering..... (26)
ymeofcrplainfield, Illinois USA4 Threads 51 PostsIf you have had encounters with your local police, were they bad experiences, or good, and what impression did it leave?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Encounters? Umm, I assume you mean in their professional capacity? I got a ticket once for an illegal left hand turn (I didn't see the sign) but he was polite about it. If you don't break the law, chances are slim you're going to have such an "encounter" with a police officer.
------ This thread is Archived ------
First man I met here was a motorcycle cop. He is a sargent, but to many years on a bike to make an impression. Hell couldn't even make a dent......JK.....had coffee and dinner a few times. NO he never made and impression, but love the cuffs....
man I bad today
V.
man I bad today
V.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Laffs.....raise your right ...do you swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth......one of the best things about working a beat car was the ability to use discretion.
------ This thread is Archived ------
bad can be good 
------ This thread is Archived ------
Oh, so you want to Miranda me? Have at it!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Only real encounters are at a bbq amongst friends - the only impression I was left with.. never ever run around a K-9. Perpetrators like to run and taste like chicken, K-9's like chicken.
------ This thread is Archived ------
You asked for it...
You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. Do you understand?
Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law. Do you understand?
You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future. Do you understand?
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. Do you understand?
If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. Do you understand?
Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?
You have the right to remain silent and refuse to answer questions. Do you understand?
Anything you do say may be used against you in a court of law. Do you understand?
You have the right to consult an attorney before speaking to the police and to have an attorney present during questioning now or in the future. Do you understand?
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish. Do you understand?
If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. Do you understand?
Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to answer my questions without an attorney present?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Thanks, hun. I know the Miranda by heart. Have since the '60s. Dragnet, you know.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Good times!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Miranda doesn't consist of what you used, you used part of the statements to swear one in, in a court of law.
------ This thread is Archived ------
*has a feeling when "spreading",its not peaunut butter and jam*
------ This thread is Archived ------
As much as I find the comedy in 'hands on your PC'.. taken out of context, that could be very naughty.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Nope, it was recited by Sergeant Joe Friday on Dragnet. And I think on Adam-12 they might have said it a time or two. It's changed somewhat since those days, though.
As I'm sure you are aware, it is based on the 1963 Miranda v. Arizona ruling, wherein "the Supreme Court ruled that the defendant, Ernesto Miranda, was intimidated by the interrogation and that he did not understand his right not to incriminate himself or his right to counsel. On this basis, they overturned his conviction. Miranda was later convicted in a new trial, with witnesses testifying against him and other evidence presented. He served 11 years."
May justice prevail.
As I'm sure you are aware, it is based on the 1963 Miranda v. Arizona ruling, wherein "the Supreme Court ruled that the defendant, Ernesto Miranda, was intimidated by the interrogation and that he did not understand his right not to incriminate himself or his right to counsel. On this basis, they overturned his conviction. Miranda was later convicted in a new trial, with witnesses testifying against him and other evidence presented. He served 11 years."
May justice prevail.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Yeah, I'll put my hands on my "PC," all right. ...so you won't be able to. hehehe
------ This thread is Archived ------
How about "Book 'em Danno, Murder One"
------ This thread is Archived ------
Figured you'd come off with that one! 
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Ladies
makeover
s*xual skills
The weird and the random facts around the world
your favorite topic?
Would you hire this guy - for any job?
Kultur-multur
What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
beauty of the heart
I'm a 53 YEAR'S YUNG MAN that lives back in the 80s
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,360 Views
25 Comments
Created: Oct 2006
Last Viewed: Apr 16
Last Commented: Oct 2006
0 Likes