The Imperial Presidency (14)
No comments on this???
------ This thread is Archived ------
HealthyLiving: No comments on this???
Well right now we are waiting to see if any of the court cases running are going to see Obamanation be behind bars in Fed pen. Taitz just got a subpoena for Obamanations Occidental College records.
------ This thread is Archived ------
HealthyLiving: No comments on this???
I just got here.
I think everybody realizes that Obama considers himself above the law.
So did Bush.
Both are puppets of the same moneyed elite.
Not much hope of change for the better anytime soon either.
------ This thread is Archived ------
HealthyLiving: No comments on this???
Obama acted within his executive powers, he is not impeached.
What is your complaint.
That he exercised his executive powers.
Or what he exercised them on``````
------ This thread is Archived ------
------ This Post was removed by Moderator ------
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatwarne: Obama acted within his executive powers, he is not impeached.
What is your complaint.
That he exercised his executive powers.Or what he exercised them on``````
What is your complaint.
That he exercised his executive powers.Or what he exercised them on``````
When and by what means did the president ever receive any supposed "executive powers" that allow him to rule by decree? Never.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
------ This thread is Archived ------
They all dance to the very same tune.Their campaign contribs.
------ This thread is Archived ------
RayfromUSA: When and by what means did the president ever receive any supposed "executive powers" that allow him to rule by decree? Never.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
Welcome to my world Ray
------ This thread is Archived ------
It doesn't really matter which party's pigs are fatter.
They are all bred on the same globalist farm.
They are set in place above us, not to care for us or love us,
but to rob us of our wealth and do us harm.
Piglets like Barack Obama are but actors in the drama.
In the end they'll wind up on their master's table.
All the mediatic spin is but lies from start to end.
It's just there to lend some credence to the fable.
Yes Obama's acting regal, doing things that are not legal
But the other party's guys did just the same.
They are nothing but bit actors, minor un-important factors
It's the banks and financiers who run the game.
They are all bred on the same globalist farm.
They are set in place above us, not to care for us or love us,
but to rob us of our wealth and do us harm.
Piglets like Barack Obama are but actors in the drama.
In the end they'll wind up on their master's table.
All the mediatic spin is but lies from start to end.
It's just there to lend some credence to the fable.
Yes Obama's acting regal, doing things that are not legal
But the other party's guys did just the same.
They are nothing but bit actors, minor un-important factors
It's the banks and financiers who run the game.
------ This thread is Archived ------
tomcatwarne: Welcome to my world Ray
Yours and Obama's.
------ This thread is Archived ------
The puppet's agenda.
Who says Obama hasn't created any jobs?
Who says Obama hasn't created any jobs?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Obama, remember that emperor
who burned their capital town
while happily played his lyre.
Don't forget the U.S. empire
don't forgive and turns down
those who betray the voter.
who burned their capital town
while happily played his lyre.
Don't forget the U.S. empire
don't forgive and turns down
those who betray the voter.
------ This thread is Archived ------
EXECUTIVE ORDER DEFINED: Under the Constitution, the president is vested with the executive power of the government (Article II, Section 1, clause 1), the power to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" (Article II, Section 1, clause 7), and the power to see that the laws are faithfully executed (Article II, Section 3). From these powers is implied the authority to issue "executive orders."
Actually, the term "executive order" has never been defined by Congress. And the validity of executive orders has been questioned many times over the years, at least dating back to Lincoln' executive measures, bypassing Congress, taken during the Civil War, as mentioned above. However, a ruling as to the extent or limit to which they may be used has never been determined by the courts or by Congress.
My question is this... Why has the "implied" executive order never been defined by Congress nor the extents or limits been determined by the Courts or Congress??? Why has this been left Wide Open???
HL
Actually, the term "executive order" has never been defined by Congress. And the validity of executive orders has been questioned many times over the years, at least dating back to Lincoln' executive measures, bypassing Congress, taken during the Civil War, as mentioned above. However, a ruling as to the extent or limit to which they may be used has never been determined by the courts or by Congress.
tomcatwarne: Obama acted within his executive powers, he is not impeached.
What is your complaint.
That he exercised his executive powers.Or what he exercised them on``````
What is your complaint.
That he exercised his executive powers.Or what he exercised them on``````
RayfromUSA: When and by what means did the president ever receive any supposed "executive powers" that allow him to rule by decree? Never.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
It's just that through corruption various administrations began to exceed the powers accorded to the presidency, and, also by corruption, Congress and the supreme court failed to act to prevent it from happening.
And so now the precedent has been set to allow the president to rule as a virtual dictator, and the constitutional separation of powers has been shredded.
Nowadays presidents simply rule by decree. They are temporary appointed dictators, loyal not to the country but to the ruling moneyed elite that pull their strings.
My question is this... Why has the "implied" executive order never been defined by Congress nor the extents or limits been determined by the Courts or Congress??? Why has this been left Wide Open???
HL
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
Why is this shameful?
makeover
What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
Democrats destroyed America
Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
882 Views
13 Comments
Created: Dec 2012
Last Viewed: 12 hrs ago
Last Commented: Dec 2012
0 Likes
Related Forums
- More Proof The GOP is a Criminal Organization
- Karen McDougal - Playmate Model will testify in Hush Money Trial
- Why is this shameful?
- makeover
- What happened to CS while i was away.. (Long time)
- Who will be The Last Person To Post... VERSION FOUR
- Democrats destroyed America
- Gal / sdarlagg passed away on April 10, 2024
- The GOP Representatives owned by Vladimir Putin
- One week of the most outrageous GOP leadership!
Rep. Eric Cantor (VA-07)
Washington, Oct 23 - The Office of House Majority Leader Eric Cantor released a report, The Imperial Presidency, to make clear that the result of President Obama's disregard for the legislative process has been a breakdown in the rule of law which has reduced economic growth and individual prosperity.
Majority Leader Cantor's office stated:
"President Obama’s term in office has been characterized by weak economic growth, historic debt, high unemployment, and unprecedented disregard for legislative authority and the separation of powers. Clear, transparent, predictable rules that are applied without preference help create certainty and allow individuals to invest, build businesses, and create jobs. When there is a breakdown in the rule of law, increased uncertainty leads to reduced investment and less growth. The Committees of the House of Representatives have investigated and documented numerous breakdowns in the rule of law and this report showcases over 40 such examples."
Please visit