SECRET INTERNET PROJECT TAKING OVER IN CHERRY HILL, NEW JERSEY...AND SOON YOUR HOMES ( Archived) (6)

Power To The People.......

September 19 2015



Well, its has begun. Over 75 people, all week long, has been going to the America's Best Value inn Motel in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, sat in the parking lot, and tried to use the internet in a variety of ways. They were seeking to find conspiracies involving the internet at this particular location because of many complaints. On September 16, 2015, it was established that a special kind of software is being used within the internet system by Comcast Communications, that prohibits parties from hiding their IP Addresses from hackers or spies. Even some within the Townhomes next door to the motel is experiencing an invasion of this sort with their internet service. And while this is taking place, google-analytics.com, google-retrieve.com, and Readjs.revsci.net, is logging and storing data from each and every computer. It appears that informants in motels all across the U.S. has gotten their wish. We recieved a call today from parties within Philadelphia, who overheard secret dealings with many financial tycoons. The move was first pushed by New Jersey Governor, Chris Christie, who then connected with the New Jersey Homeland Security, and secretly with Local News Media Sources, several Senators, the Clintons, Carla Fiorina, Jeb Bush, and others. From what is being revealed, this new move will spread first at all hotels and motels across the U.S. Then it will be pushed at you within your private homes.

According to sources, Hotspot Shield, Tor Services, Hideallip, Safeip, Realhideip, and a myriad of other ip hiding software is being blocked out by this new software. It is being said, in secret, that its very hard to keep tabs on all Americans when they can hide their Ip addresses from government sources temporarily. Also, their main concern is when the feds and local police puts informants on American citizens, its hard for the informants to keep track of internet activity. And as a result, the America's Best Value Inn Motel is the first experimental internet project. Infact, they have been discussing this all along. Remember, for many months, EFF has been working with a broad coalition of advocates to persuade the Federal Communications Commission to adopt new Open Internet rules that would survive legal scrutiny, and actually help protect the Open Internet. According to the FCC’s own fact sheet, the proposed rule will allow the FCC to review (and presumably punish) non-neutral practices that may harm consumers, or edge providers. EFF later filed a letter with the FCC urging it to clarify and sharply limit the scope of any general conduct provision. The EFF stated that: The Commission should use its Title II authority to engage in light-touch regulation, taking great care to adhere to clear, targeted, and transparent rules. A general conduct rule, applied on a case-by- case basis with the only touchstone being whether a given practice harms consumers or edge providers, may lead to years of expensive litigation to determine the meaning of harm (for those who can afford to engage in it). What is worse, it could be abused by a future Commission to target legitimate practices that offer significant benefits to the public. Accordingly, if the Commission intends to adopt a general conduct rule it should spell out, in advance, the contours and limits of that rule, and clarify that the rule shall be applied only in specific circumstances.

Unfortunately, if a report from Reuters is correct, the general conduct rule will be anything but clear. The FCC will evaluate harm, based on consideration of seven factors: impact on competition; impact on innovation; impact on free expression; impact on broadband deployment and investments; whether the actions in question are specific to some applications and not others; whether they comply with industry best standards and practices; and whether they take place without the awareness of the end-user, the Internet subscriber. Alot of changes are being made prior to Pope Francis arrival to the U.S.,and many of the spells and rituals will be within the several styles of music, accomjpnaied by invocations. Anyway, there are several problems with this approach. First, it suggests that the FCC believes it has broad authority to pursue any number of practices, hardly the narrow, light-touch approach we need to protect the open Internet. Second, we worry that this rule will be extremely expensive in practice, because anyone wanting to bring a complaint will be hard-pressed to predict whether they will succeed. For example, how will the Commission determine “industry best standards and practices? As a practical matter, it is likely that only companies that can afford years of litigation to answer these questions will be able to rely on the rule at all. Third, a multi-factor test gives the FCC an awful lot of discretion, potentially giving an unfair advantage to parties with insider influence.

Whenever a government, in this case, the New Jersey Government, pushes for some strange law out of the blue, they most certainly hope that Americans are ignorant on the subject so they can mold you into becoming a believer in their agenda.
History is changed by those social engineers who work with governments to coerce you through party loyalty, peer pressure, and the illusion that whatever they propose will be beneficial to you and will somehow help the little guy or underdog. You assuming that you are an underdog or a person that is too busy to take the time to be informed are apt pupils for their nefarious activities. Those with power and money have at their disposal all kinds of bottomless pockets that can program you into complying with their desires. Unfortunately people have learned that it is best to play stupid and criticize those who try to be inquisitive. Stupid is as stupid does. Life is a box of chocolates. If you take a bite out of a couple you can eliminate the caramels form the nuts. That’s the way they want it and most Americans are obliged to follow through and grant it. The federal government is about to seize control of the Internet and most Americans don’t even know about it and they are using partisan politics to shill out lie after lie to confuse the public and create a sense of insecurity and lack of confidence about the net, when policies in place for 18 years have kept the internet a valuable tool for commerce and information. Released in July 1997, the internet Framework for Global Electronic Commerce was drafted by President Clinton’s chief policy adviser Ira Magaziner. The choice of Magaziner to lead the initiative was originally greeted with suspicion by some in the Internet policy community since he had previously spearheaded the Administration’s controversial health care reform effort, which prescribed a heavy dose of government intervention.

The government from day one has hated the internet, and even though the internet was responsible for electing Barack Obama it is also the same internet that has exposed him as a giant fraud. This is why the net is now in the cross hairs. Obama is blowing it up, and is rebooting it in his own image, by using Comcast Communications, and a poor human hybrids who acn't afford the internet. His proposals will more than likely make it more difficult to publish online and will most certainly damage our right to freedom of speech and the independent press. It has begun at the America's Best Value Inn Motel in Cherry Hill, New Jersey, which was witnessed by 75 people using Comcast in the parking lot. We already see how the FCC controls content on television and radio. Do we want restrictions online? Also, treating the internet like a utility is basically saying that the internet is like water, sewer, and electricity. While water and electricity are necessities, the internet really isn’t. Now for many people it is a necessity for business, work, and social events. The utility companies have standardized water and electricity as basic products with very little more that what you are paying for. They can charge a lot for their standardized utilities, and they run the risk of being monopolies; being a monopoly gives them the ability to be less innovative, and regulation protects them from competition. Broadband providers are constantly pushing the boundaries of technology to keep pace with exploding demand. This new software which controls your key boards, and can block certain software from working. Its first being started at motels. If you regulate broadband like you regulate water, competition will evaporate and with it, the incentive to keep upgrading networks.

Applying FCC controls with the Title II provisions to IP networks creates a new Federal Computer Commission with authority to weigh in on everything connected to an IP network. This means everything. The truth is that net neutrality is not whether a firm non-discrimination rule for ISPs is, or is not, a good idea it is most certainly an idea that has now arrived and must be acknowledged. The hard question about net neutrality is the institutional one: if we think non-discrimination by ISPs is a good idea, how do we get them to be non-discriminatory? Is the FCC well-positioned to help us reach the non-discriminatory goal without doing too much damage to the internet and the neutrality that has been around since the Clinton administration? The proponents of Obama Net meddling appear to have the majority clamoring for what they call light regulation from the FCC, and not allow overregulation to strangle and destroy the free movement of ideas and commerce online. They are expecting and encouraging the government to regulate without an iron hand. But this brings up another question since when does the government ever have any light regulations, or doesn’t take a little power, but takes more and more until we eventually see overregulation. However, just like when we posted how Pope Francis was an Religious Anti-Christ, and he, along with countless Rappers, will be conjuring devils within their rituals, many people wanted to become part of him and his mission. Now, since we spoke about the internet in New Jersey, will people agree with the governent on this as well? Americans seem to give in really easy to the government and to the devil, and don't really care about what is to happen to them by the winter of 2015. The midwest is being ravaged by storms because many Americans in those parts are fighting against the devil. The devil is using Military Space Technology Weaponry to destroy all they own, and to wipe many of them out, with the assistance of some extraterrestrials.

When we were within the Midwestern parts of America not long ago, large numbers of them claimed that people from the East Coast were devils. They stated that people on the East Coast kill without purpose, and they are helping American become a totalitarian country! Lets back track for one moment. Recently, in New York, when two convicts allegedly escaped, one was killed, and the other was wounded and captured. And while the wounded one was bleeding severely, so-called humans in the town were chanting, "kill him", and more. What type of people are we around in 2015? And why is it that these sort of people are making their way to see Pope Francis. Can anyone tell us why there are Americans with black eyes who shape shift here in the northeastern parts of America, are within rural areas of the midewest, and are on the west coast? And who are these black men and women with highly sloped heades? What about some of the foreigners whose eyes slant and dialate from time to time? These are many of the forces who will not only attend Pope Francis ceremonies, but will chant things in their own regions at the same time he is chanting. You won't know what he is saying because he will be speaking a dialect of Aramaic, a language in which the devil spoke in the real life exorcism of Emily Rose. America's fate is being sealed, and people are trodding towards the Anti-Christ by the millions, according to Action News 6, in Philadelphia. The number sky rocketed within 7 days! Yet, while this is taking place, many coverups are as well. Just remember, when it comes to the medical business, most doctors are middlemen between the patient, big pharma, the DEA, and the FDA.

In 2005, Obama had bought shares in Baxter International. Baxter International was the pharmaceutical company that created the H1N1 flu vaccine. Right after he bought the shares, Obama introduced the first comprehensive bill to address the threat of avian influenza pandemic. There’s already more than enough statistical evidence for American citizens to demand that scientists come clean with just how dangerous these flew outbreaks are. The encouragement to get a flu vaccine has become a zealous undertaking since 2005, and there are many Americans who question the safety of being over- inoculated. A series of government researchers, health experts and academics are urged to impose self-censorship, when they are pressed by the public to divulge why our country has started to over-medicate the citizenry and vaccinate people to prevent anything from shingles to the flu. We have been told not to question what medical science is doing to us or for us. We see in the media, semi-qualified medial grand-standers claiming special credibility, as self-appointed beacons of science on issues that are much, much larger than what their pay grade allows them to comment on. It used to be that the public was informed about who was making medical decisions for the country. The Surgeon General would make formal statements to the people to tell them about public health concerns.

However, since June there has been new fuel to put on the fire of the so-called conspiracy against these naturopaths. On June 19, a fisherman found the body of Dr. James Bradstreet in a North Carolina river, with a gunshot wound through his chest. Bradstreet was a forceful proponent of the theory that vaccines are linked to autism. Just weeks before his death, Bradstreet’s office was raided by the FDA. Three days later, chiropractors Bruce Hedendal and Baron Holt were separately found dead, and eight days after that, Dr. Theresa Sievers was murdered in her home. One month later, it was reported that holistic doctors meeting at a conference in northern Germany were poisoned and taken to the hospital. It was said that 30 different doctors, aged 25 to 55 were poisoned with a psychoactive drug at the conference. During the conference, people began staggering and complaining of cramps, while others had more severe reactions and strong hallucinations. Fifteen ambulances, a helicopter and some 160 rescue personnel were called to the scene to rush the doctors to the hospital. It was later reported that renowned best-selling author and holistic cancer specialist Mitchell Gaynor, M.D., was found dead in the woods near his home. On July 21, 2015, Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez another doctor who was considered by his detractors a fringe oncologist was also found dead. In the past six weeks the list of these dead or missing doctors has now risen to 14. No one knows what ties they all have or if every death is suspicious, but the whole list becomes a coincidental artifact as most of the doctors involved were working on natural cancer cures and others were trying to reverse the effects of autism, naturally.

Of course, the natural doctors have been working on ways to have the immune system play a critical role in helping the body resist and fight diseases like cancer. Yet, that simple fact has become the link in a growing controversy that includes everything from accusations of quackery to conspiracy to commit murder. What also adds to controversy is the mainstream media blackout on this story, which is now lending itself to being another exploited story for conspiracy theories that want to pin these murders and disappearances on the government. While the government may have some indirect connection to this type of activity, we have to also consider that what could be happening is the result of corporate espionage. Industrial espionage is conducted for commercial purposes rather than espionage for national security reasons, and should be differentiated from what the government may do directly. It is far more believable to consider all of the deaths and the poisonings of these doctors helps big drug companies to guarantee that no natural cure will be on the market. Or, that the process will be slowed down or the formulas stolen and used for a future time. The reason I am thinking that this is the case is because nearly all of the doctors who were killed , were in some way involved in activities related to the use of a naturally occurring immunity-boosting protein known as GcMAF to lessen the effects of autism and other health-related conditions including some cancers.