Hi, I think this is a subject I have yet to see brought up in the forums, I can only shutter to think that it could happen, as long as nuclear missiles exsist there is a threat of this happening. There is many natural threats to our daily lives, but in the hand of man kind this could be the most lethal and probal from of whipeing out all of life as we know it. What do you think of Nuclear War.
As long as there are people dumb enough to use them, than yes I think it can happen. So many nutjob leaders out there that are trying to get it (and already have it) that its a lotto on whos gonna use it first.
Even though the bombs are around, and almost all coutries have their own stock piles, I don't think any one would use them unless it was a last resource to be pulled.To many bad side effects and radio active stuff that takes centuries to go away. Right now, we are worried about north korea, our country thinks that they might sell a nuclear weapon head to the terrorist.
I could care less who North Korea sells the warhead to, unless the country is Iran. Iran is the only country with the delivery methods to make one truely viable without toasting themselves and one that's remotely close to hostile. At that, I don't feel they'd even sell it - they'd probably trade as they're working on things together to extend rocket distances.
If one goes airborne, there's enough other countries with the nuke and I'd go so far as to say nuclear holocaust would insue.
What I am most confident in, should it ever get to that point.. is our nuclear superiority. We are one of the top 3, both power and range-wise that exist in the world. If it starts, we'd definitely end it.
Humanity has been fighting wars for thousands of years. But it was less than 60 years ago that a new weapon of unprecedented capacity was first unleashed, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan on August 4 and 6, 1945. A new era of mass destruction had begun. At the end of World War II, General Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, accepted Japan's unconditional surrender. Aboard the battleship U.S.S. Missouri, General MacArthur summarized the danger and the choice facing humanity in this new era:
Military alliances, balances of power, leagues of nations, all in turn failed, leaving the only path to be the way of the crucible of war. The utter destructiveness of war now blocks out this alternative. We have had our last chance. If we will not devise some greater and more equitable system, our Armageddon will be at our door. The problem basically is theological and involves a spiritual recrudescence and improvement of human character that will synchronize with our almost matchless advances in science, art, literature and all material and cultural developments of the past two thousand years. It must be of the spirit if we are to save the flesh.
MacArthur's statement was a bit more in-depth than that, and reads as such:
"Abolition of war is no longer an ethical question to be pondered solely by learned philosophers and ecclesiastics, but a hard core one for the decision of the masses whose survival is the issue. Many will tell you with mockery and ridicule that the abolition of war can only be a dream.that it is the vague imagining of a visionary. But we must go on or we will go under! We must have new thoughts, new ideas, new concepts. We must break out of the strait jacket of the past. We must have sufficient imagination and courage to translate the universal wish for peace - which is rapidly becoming a universal necessity - into actuality."
"The very triumph of scientific annihilation has destroyed the possibility of war being a medium of practical settlement of international differences. If you lose, you are annihilated. If you win, you stand only to lose. War contains the germs of double suicide. Military alliances, balances of power, leagues of nations all in turn have failed. We have our last chance. If we will not devise some greater and more equitable system, Armageddon will be at our door." - General Douglas MacArthur
The Kamakazee or Terrorist is a threat because his beliefs can be stronger than his own survival instinct. When one imagines that a whole country can be a terrorist with the beliefs meaning more important than the survival instinct global destruction can be a probability. When the emotions are higher than the intellect trouble can happen. "I" over "E".
Is there any current danger of nuclear war? Perhaps international treaties have calmed Cold War fears; since 1968, more than 180 nations have signed the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. But several nuclear nations have not signed the treaty, and many that have signed are believed to be violating its terms. Terrorist groups also continue their activities, uncaring of international law. In addition to nuclear concerns, chemical and biological weapons are a growing threat. And a new threat is on the horizon: along with the feared nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) weapons of mass destruction, a new category—genetics, nanotechnology and robotics (GNR)—promises new horrors for the 21st century.
People talk about North Korea and Iran, but what really scares me are terrorists. Russia has a lot of unaccounted for nukes. All they have to do is fall into the wrong hands. It's hard to fight terrorists.
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
There is many natural threats to our daily lives, but in the hand of man kind this could be the most lethal and probal from of whipeing out all of life as we know it.
What do you think of Nuclear War.