NK just fired a missile against Japan ( Archived) (263)

Dec 9, 2017 8:29 AM CST NK just fired a missile against Japan
rizlared: I have never said the USA is violating any arms agreement.

NK is like a bad-tempered child having a tantrum in a supermarket, like all children they are seeking attention, the more their mother scolds them the more they kick and scream throw things, break things. But if the mother walks away, the child calms down, starts to realise the world does not centre around them, and given time, they will seek out their mother, hold her hand and behave correctly.

In my analogy replace the child with NK and the mother as USA, now do you understand?

The USA has provoked NK and seems surprised at the result, yet in Asia most will tell you it was exactly as expected. You cannot deal with an Asian country using Western ideology.

You already know how toothless the UN is, indeed one of the few things we ever agreed about was the failure of that organisation. As for the USA, well War will divert attention away from Trump, and as we all know, all wars make the USA rich, they couldn't care less about the deaths they cause money is the only thing that matters to the already rich and greedy.


I'm afraid your analogy us wrong. Tantrum for a child works sometimes when we leave tgem alone. That's the end of it.

What NK is doing doesn't equate to that. It gas a very serious consequence to the world if it is left doing what what it is doing.

I wouldn't completely rule out about money as an objective of war but this case isn't about money. I'd rather say, it's the protection of democratic ideology.

Protection of countries m, like South Korea to be safe.

Because of this US won't leave no matter how you preach.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 9, 2017 1:28 PM CST NK just fired a missile against Japan
rizlaredonline today!
rizlaredonline today!rizlaredNot in Cebu City, Central Visayas Philippines89 Threads 2 Polls 5,588 Posts
lindsyjones: I'm afraid your analogy us wrong. Tantrum for a child works sometimes when we leave tgem alone. That's the end of it.

What NK is doing doesn't equate to that. It gas a very serious consequence to the world if it is left doing what what it is doing.

I wouldn't completely rule out about money as an objective of war but this case isn't about money. I'd rather say, it's the protection of democratic ideology.

Protection of countries m, like South Korea to be safe.

Because of this US won't leave no matter how you preach.


I'm not preaching about anything. I'm stating an opinion.

You obviously refuse to admit that the NK situation has been exacerbated by the comments made by the President of the USA, that together with the provocation of the war games held right in front of NK has created the situation we find ourselves in today.

South Korea needs protecting, and they have that protection from Japan and China, the last thing China wants is a war on their front door, the mass of refugees flooding into China from the North would be catastrophic for China.

You are part Asian, you know how important the ideology of not "Losing face" is held in Asia, especially East Asia. Trump is playing directly into Kim's hands by saying all he says, and refusing to back down and let this problem be handled by China, Russia et al.

Trump needs the diversion, he needs to look powerful, but at the cost of millions of lives, Trump and Kim are two peas in a pod, they care only about themselves and the power they hold and the power they want for the future, and neither have the astuteness, intelligence or diplomacy to hold such a position.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Dec 10, 2017 11:00 AM CST NK just fired a missile against Japan
rizlared: I'm not preaching about anything. I'm stating an opinion.

You obviously refuse to admit that the NK situation has been exacerbated by the comments made by the President of the USA, that together with the provocation of the war games held right in front of NK has created the situation we find ourselves in today.

South Korea needs protecting, and they have that protection from Japan and China, the last thing China wants is a war on their front door, the mass of refugees flooding into China from the North would be catastrophic for China.

You are part Asian, you know how important the ideology of not "Losing face" is held in Asia, especially East Asia. Trump is playing directly into Kim's hands by saying all he says, and refusing to back down and let this problem be handled by China, Russia et al.

Trump needs the diversion, he needs to look powerful, but at the cost of millions of lives, Trump and Kim are two peas in a pod, they care only about themselves and the power they hold and the power they want for the future, and neither have the astuteness, intelligence or diplomacy to hold such a position.


Sorry about not getting back with you on this one Rizla.

Yes it is very important to save face regardless of our race, belief and cultural differences but the truth is, this is not about saving faces. This is about keeping peace in an area that is prone to invasion.

China in all its history has always invaded its neighboring weak countries: Nepal, Mongolia, North Korea and all the other countries. Because of this I still believe that had the super powers like the US leave the country, it is no safer than when the police is there.

Now world history documents how many wars there is because of greed. Heck check how the muslim always held a very superior stance against all other countries and kept invading until today.

Anyways, no I don't believe that if the US would leave Asia alone that it would be warless.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here