DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ? ( Archived) (89)

Sep 15, 2010 7:55 PM CSTDID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba, Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts

DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?(Vote Below)

- (To Vote: select an option above, then press this button)
YES
20
27%
MAYBE
4
5%
I DONT KNOW
4
5%
NO
45
62%
Total Votes
73
INTERESTED IN OTHER PEOPLES OPINION
------ This thread is Archived ------
Sep 15, 2010 10:31 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
BlainX
BlainXBlainXmansfield, Ohio USA205 Threads 188 Polls 1,424 Posts
aspen12: INTERESTED IN OTHER PEOPLES OPINION


You see we have an unstable Terrorist Nation Called Iran, so the goal is to keep Military interests and installations there which are capable of ready deployment of heavy equipment and offensive counter measures. Do you really think a Muslim Nation would of allowed this counter measure to be deplyed ther otherwise.



detective
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 16, 2010 5:42 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
WHY WHY WHY WHY SMOKING GUN ? WHAT SMOKING GUN?
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 16, 2010 10:18 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
DonMills
DonMillsDonMillsGrimsby, Ontario Canada60 Posts
After 9/11 war with Iraq was inevitable.

American foreign policy in the middle east had failed to contain the emergence of new world powers in the 21st century. The demise of the Soviet Union/Bloc was merely the end of the Cold War

The first Iraq war revealed that.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 16, 2010 11:28 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
just_wondering
just_wonderingjust_wonderingSaskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada2 Threads 1 Polls 37 Posts
I dont think there should have been a WAR unless they really planned to win it this is not a war. They need to really go in and do some damage and end this crap they call a war A few nice bombs
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 17, 2010 3:25 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
I said no from the very beginning and a friend disagreed and said we should support the US. I'm glad Canada stayed out of it. I told him we are our own country and do not have to agree with everything the US does. There was no proof of WOMD and nothing was ever found. United Nations would not give the US and England approval and they went in anyway. Now so many are dead but it was good they got Hussein.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 18, 2010 12:13 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
I think you better do your home homework! I'm allowed to have my own opinion. Yes many have died......for what! They was no proof. Iraq was invaded because they thought there was WMD and there wasn't any! That's a bunch of propaganda. Iraq isn't much better than it was before. I see you don't have much empathy for those left behind when the troops leave. As I said I'm torn about it. I understand the troops want to come home. I'm not against them coming home. I just feel bad for Iraq and what they will have to deal with when they go.

Stop yelling!
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 18, 2010 12:26 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
StillOfTheNight
StillOfTheNightStillOfTheNightClarenville Area, Newfoundland Canada11 Threads 2,832 Posts
This one is too intense for me
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 18, 2010 8:35 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: I think you better do your home homework! I'm allowed to have my own opinion. Yes many have died......for what! They was no proof. Iraq was invaded because they thought there was WMD and there wasn't any! That's a bunch of propaganda. Iraq isn't much better than it was before. I see you don't have much empathy for those left behind when the troops leave. As I said I'm torn about it. I understand the troops want to come home. I'm not against them coming home. I just feel bad for Iraq and what they will have to deal with when they go.

Stop yelling!










YELLING IS GOOD FOR PEOPLE HARD AT HEARING HOW COME SO MANY CARE ABOUT MY YELLING AND NOT ABOUT CONTENT
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 18, 2010 11:08 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
DonMills
DonMillsDonMillsGrimsby, Ontario Canada60 Posts
who and where?

works both ways, war.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 19, 2010 5:09 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: I think you better do your home homework! I'm allowed to have my own opinion. Yes many have died......for what! They was no proof. Iraq was invaded because they thought there was WMD and there wasn't any! That's a bunch of propaganda. Iraq isn't much better than it was before. I see you don't have much empathy for those left behind when the troops leave. As I said I'm torn about it. I understand the troops want to come home. I'm not against them coming home. I just feel bad for Iraq and what they will have to deal with when they go.

Stop yelling!





do you actully beleive that .they were there long time ago and there be there after troops go home GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT NOW NOW
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 19, 2010 6:27 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
aspen12: do you actully beleive that .they were there long time ago and there be there after troops go home GET OUT GET OUT GET OUT NOW NOW


You're gonna try and keep bating me aren't ya? I wouldn't doubt at some time or another Iraq has had WMD but they didn't find any upon inspection to justify the invasion. United Nations did not approve.

With that, I see from your other threads you like to argue so I'm not going to waste anymore of my time.

Peace out! grin
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 22, 2010 4:26 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
sheppardman716
sheppardman716sheppardman716Amherst, New York USA2 Threads 2 Polls 10 Posts
Hell just have another Hiroshima and Nagasaki
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 22, 2010 7:54 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
IAM NOT TRYING TO BATE ANYONE IAM INSUNIFACANT IN THIS.ALL I WANT TO SAY WAR IS HELL IT CHEAPENS LIFE.ITS WHAT IT WILL DO TO US IT HARDENS OUR HEART LOOK AT YOUR CHILD AND HOW WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEONE TO TAKE HIS OR HER LIFE YOUR JUST ONE WOMEN WHAT ABOUT ALL THE WOMEN OF THE WORLD.IF THERE IS ANYTHING I CAN DO TO STOP THIS MADNESS I WILL TRY IT.




heart beating heart beating heart1 heart beating heart1 heart1 heart wings heart wings teddybear teddybear teddybear
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 22, 2010 8:32 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
aspen12: WHERE DID YOU HERE THIS WHT MAGIZINE WERE THERE AMERICAN WHAT DO YOU THINK THEY WANT YOU TO BELEIVE THERE ARE ALL KILLERS THEY ARE ALL NOT HUMAN ALL WILD ANIMALS.LIES LIES LIES LIES


Right here, you must have seen it.



This is what the Taliban are doing to women. What's going to happen to them when the troops go home?

The troops only kill when they have to. They are trying to kill the Taliban, the very group who planned the Sept. 11 attacks. Don't tell me you're going to say the American Govt. planned it. doh They had every right to go to Afganistan.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 22, 2010 8:44 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
aspen12: IAM NOT TRYING TO BATE ANYONE IAM INSUNIFACANT IN THIS.ALL I WANT TO SAY WAR IS HELL IT CHEAPENS LIFE.ITS WHAT IT WILL DO TO US IT HARDENS OUR HEART LOOK AT YOUR CHILD AND HOW WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEONE TO TAKE HIS OR HER LIFE YOUR JUST ONE WOMEN WHAT ABOUT ALL THE WOMEN OF THE WORLD.IF THERE IS ANYTHING I CAN DO TO STOP THIS MADNESS I WILL TRY IT.


As my Grandpa told me long ago, there will never be peace on earth. He said war is all about religion.

As long as people have intolerance for people's choice of religion, their ethnicity and greediness over land there will never be peace.

I wish there was no war. But humans never learn.



Still waiting for Peace.

teddybear
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 12:31 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: I said no from the very beginning and a friend disagreed and said we should support the US. I'm glad Canada stayed out of it. I told him we are our own country and do not have to agree with everything the US does. There was no proof of WOMD and nothing was ever found. United Nations would not give the US and England approval and they went in anyway. Now so many are dead but it was good they got Hussein.






PERHAPS IT WAS BUT WHAT PRICE OVER MILION PLUS IRAQS DIED ALSO AND ITS NOT OVER YET.WHAT ABOUT ALL THE SUFFERING AND DESTRUCTION OF INFRASTRUCTER WATER SEWER AND SUCH





ITS ABOUT MONEY BIG MONEY
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 8:11 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: What? We agree? But you don't like all the accolades the vets get? They liberated the Jews from the concentration camps and ended the war. Of course they're heroes. My Grandpa is a hero. Or are you talking about the recent wars?

War is ugly. It really has affected my family. That's for sure.




OF COURSE I DONT THE VETS DID WHAT THEY THOUGHT WAS RIGHT THEY DIDNT WANT TO DIE ANYMORE THAN YOU OR I.MY DAD WAS IN 1 WORLD WAR HE TOLD ME SOME HORERDOUS THINGS HE WAS AT VIMY RIDGE IN THE TRENCHES HE HAD TO BE HOSPITALIZED A FEW TIMES IT NEVER GOES AWAY ONE THING HE NEVER HAD TO KILL WOMEN AND CHILDREN IT WAS MANO VERSES MANO .NOW WE ARE BURNING PEOPLE ALIVE DESTROYING CITIES AND ALL INHABITANTS.ARENT THEY PEOPLE IAM NOT HERE TO GET ANYONE IAM JUST HERE TO GET PEOPLE TALKING .I DONT WANT TO ENCOURAGE ANY WAR. HE TOLD ME ONE THING I REMBER MOST





IF A MAN WASNT SCARED HE WAS CRAZY OR MAD
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 5:36 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
aspen12: A MAN WASNT SCARED HE WAS CRAZY OR MAD


Probably. teddybear

All we can do is hope for peace but it sure seems hopeless.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 6:10 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: Right here, you must have seen it.



This is what the Taliban are doing to women. What's going to happen to them when the troops go home?

The troops only kill when they have to. They are trying to kill the Taliban, the very group who planned the Sept. 11 attacks. Don't tell me you're going to say the American Govt. planned it. They had every right to go to Afganistan.




first of all we are talking of IRAQ .DID THE COUTRY OF IRAQ DO THIS BOMBING ,I THOUGHT IT WAS BIN LADEN OF AFGAN.OF COURSE I DO GOVT. DID THISOR A LEAST RICH PEOPLE. COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT A TALIBAN LOOKS LIKE?WHAT ABOUT AMERICA THEY HAVE WEPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OF COURSE WE WOULD NOT USE IT WE ARE ABOVE IT ALL.NAPALM -----VIETNAM-------ATOMIC BOMB ------JAPAN PHOSPHOUS BOMBS ----DRESDEN THE FEVER I BELIEVE SCARLET FEVER IN BLANKETS INDIANS SPENT URANIUM ISAREAL IRAQ BUT THAT OKAY ITS THE US DOING IT BUT WE CAN DO IT BUT YOU CANT WHAT HIPOCRACY WHO WOULD DO THESE CRIMES SIMPLE ANSWER USA. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY POWER
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 8:35 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
aspen12: first of all we are talking of IRAQ .DID THE COUTRY OF IRAQ DO THIS BOMBING ,I THOUGHT IT WAS BIN LADEN OF AFGAN.OF COURSE I DO GOVT. DID THISOR A LEAST RICH PEOPLE. COULD YOU TELL ME WHAT A TALIBAN LOOKS LIKE?WHAT ABOUT AMERICA THEY HAVE WEPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION OF COURSE WE WOULD NOT USE IT WE ARE ABOVE IT ALL.NAPALM -----VIETNAM-------ATOMIC BOMB ------JAPAN PHOSPHOUS BOMBS ----DRESDEN THE FEVER I BELIEVE SCARLET FEVER IN BLANKETS INDIANS SPENT URANIUM ISAREAL IRAQ BUT THAT OKAY ITS THE US DOING IT BUT WE CAN DO IT BUT YOU CANT WHAT HIPOCRACY WHO WOULD DO THESE CRIMES SIMPLE ANSWER USA. ITS ALL ABOUT MONEY POWER


Well, when I first brought this up I did correct myself in saying it was in Afghanistan. What I'm saying is there are terrible astrocities against humanity there and it isn't much better since Iraq was invaded. Shouldn't the country be left in better shape than when it was first invaded? I never said I was for the Iraq war. And no country should have WMD. What happened in Japan is a sad day in war history.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 23, 2010 8:52 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
musicfreak: Well, when I first brought this up I did correct myself in saying it was in Afghanistan. What I'm saying is there are terrible astrocities against humanity there and it isn't much better since Iraq was invaded. Shouldn't the country be left in better shape than when it was first invaded? I never said I was for the Iraq war. And no country should have WMD. What happened in Japan is a sad day in war history.



YES AND ITS GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN.DO YOU ACTULLY THINK IRAQ WILL BE BETTER OFF.BUILDINGS BRIDGES WATER TREATMENT PLANTS SEWER DEVASTED NO DRUGS FOOD PRODUCTION AND A GOVERMENT PRODUCED WITH BARREL OF GUN AND MONEY.HOSPITALS DESTROYED SCHOOLS DESTROYED HOW MANY YEARS WILL IT TAKE THEM TO REBUILD.WE DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE WE DONT EVEN CARE ABOUT OUR OWN.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 24, 2010 1:42 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
YES AND ITS GOING TO HAPPEN AGAIN.DO YOU ACTULLY THINK IRAQ WILL BE BETTER OFF.BUILDINGS BRIDGES WATER TREATMENT PLANTS SEWER DEVASTED NO DRUGS FOOD PRODUCTION AND A GOVERMENT PRODUCED WITH BARREL OF GUN AND MONEY.HOSPITALS DESTROYED SCHOOLS DESTROYED HOW MANY YEARS WILL IT TAKE THEM TO REBUILD.WE DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE PEOPLE WE DONT EVEN CARE ABOUT OUR OWN.[/quote

That's what I mean. They're in a poor state over there.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 24, 2010 11:25 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
just_wondering
just_wonderingjust_wonderingSaskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada2 Threads 1 Polls 37 Posts
they should have went it and bombed them and hard
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 24, 2010 1:07 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
just_wondering: they should have went it and bombed them and hard









DIDNT THEY DO THAT FOR A MONTH OR SO?WHAT DO YOU MEAN DESTROY EVERY THING MAN WOMEN CHILDREN .THEN WHO WOULD DO WORK?BOMBS ARE NEVER THE ANSWER
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 29, 2010 1:21 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
Albertaghost
AlbertaghostAlbertaghostCultural Wasteland, Alberta Canada76 Threads 5 Polls 5,914 Posts
musicfreak: I'm glad Canada stayed out of it. I told him we are our own country and do not have to agree with everything the US does.


We had over a thousand troops and military personel aiding in the invasion.

musicfreak: There was no proof of WOMD and nothing was ever found.


Correct. WMDs were only the reasons the press emphasized though and, Iraq was bound to prove they had destroyed them, not for the UN to prove they had done so. In any case, the following are the reasons for the invasion;

""to get Iraq to comply with ceasefire terms
- to stop Iraq’s Inadvertence to UNSC resolutions
- to force Iraq to cease it’s violation of human rights
- to stop Iraq’s material breaches of UNSC resolutions
- to end Iraq’s WMD capability and aspirations
- to end repression of Iraq’s civilian population
- to force Iraq to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals
- to force Iraq to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,
- to end Iraqi Support for terrorism
- to show America has the will to help allies and destroy foes
- to depose a regional threat take in Saddam that would have to be dealt with sooner or later
- to force action from SA to take care of it's radicals
- to pressure other regimes in the area not to provide passive or active support to Jihadists
- to position US troops in the region in force to enable that pressure
- to aid their global and NATO mission by placing a Strategic Air Support base
- to support and help create an Arab democracy as an example to others""

musicfreak: United Nations would not give the US and England approval and they went in anyway.


Member states already had the approval as per UNSC Res 1441 of November 2002.

musicfreak: Now so many are dead but it was good they got Hussein.


Less than twenty thousand died in the military action. Saddam killed more than that amount every month in his day to day administration of his gulag.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 29, 2010 9:04 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
Albertaghost: We had over a thousand troops and military personel aiding in the invasion.
Correct. WMDs were only the reasons the press emphasized though and, Iraq was bound to prove they had destroyed them, not for the UN to prove they had done so. In any case, the following are the reasons for the invasion;

""to get Iraq to comply with ceasefire terms
- to stop Iraq’s Inadvertence to UNSC resolutions
- to force Iraq to cease it’s violation of human rights
- to stop Iraq’s material breaches of UNSC resolutions
- to end Iraq’s WMD capability and aspirations
- to end repression of Iraq’s civilian population
- to force Iraq to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals
- to force Iraq to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,
- to end Iraqi Support for terrorism
- to show America has the will to help allies and destroy foes
- to depose a regional threat take in Saddam that would have to be dealt with sooner or later
- to force action from SA to take care of it's radicals
- to pressure other regimes in the area not to provide passive or active support to Jihadists
- to position US troops in the region in force to enable that pressure
- to aid their global and NATO mission by placing a Strategic Air Support base
- to support and help create an Arab democracy as an example to others""
Member states already had the approval as per UNSC Res 1441 of November 2002.
Less than twenty thousand died in the military action. Saddam killed more than that amount every month in his day to day administration of his gulag.





WHY DONT YOU LOOK AT YOURSELF USA. IS ALL OVER THE WORLD SLAUGHTERING PEOPLES, YOU GIVE US A BIG LIST OF IRAQS ILL DEADS

WE ARE JUST SO INNOCENT WE ARE JUST ALIVE WITH SUCH HALOS
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 29, 2010 9:09 PM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
Albertaghost: We had over a thousand troops and military personel aiding in the invasion.
Correct. WMDs were only the reasons the press emphasized though and, Iraq was bound to prove they had destroyed them, not for the UN to prove they had done so. In any case, the following are the reasons for the invasion;

""to get Iraq to comply with ceasefire terms
- to stop Iraq’s Inadvertence to UNSC resolutions
- to force Iraq to cease it’s violation of human rights
- to stop Iraq’s material breaches of UNSC resolutions
- to end Iraq’s WMD capability and aspirations
- to end repression of Iraq’s civilian population
- to force Iraq to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals
- to force Iraq to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,
- to end Iraqi Support for terrorism
- to show America has the will to help allies and destroy foes
- to depose a regional threat take in Saddam that would have to be dealt with sooner or later
- to force action from SA to take care of it's radicals
- to pressure other regimes in the area not to provide passive or active support to Jihadists
- to position US troops in the region in force to enable that pressure
- to aid their global and NATO mission by placing a Strategic Air Support base
- to support and help create an Arab democracy as an example to others""
Member states already had the approval as per UNSC Res 1441 of November 2002.
Less than twenty thousand died in the military action. Saddam killed more than that amount every month in his day to day administration of his gulag.




OVER A MILLION HAVE BEEN SLAUGHTERED MAN WOMEN AND CHILDREN OVER LIES WHAT WASTE. THOU SHALL NOT KILL YOUR STINKING BIBLE
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 30, 2010 12:54 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
Albertaghost, you come across as being very arrogant. I see you get off on debating/arguing with people and dissecting each person's posts. I've seen this a few times. I'm open to seeing both sides of an argument, you clearly only see things your way and that's it. Therefore your post doesn't justify a response from me except to say alot of what you says is a lot of BS and I don't appreciate your attacking nature. barf You seem pro war to me.
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 30, 2010 3:26 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
musicfreak
musicfreakmusicfreakParadise City, British Columbia Canada20 Threads 1 Polls 670 Posts
I think you're just looking for a fight and I refuse to give in to what you want. What I don't understand is why you're on a dating site and spend all your time in political threads arguing with people. My time is more valuable to me than to argue with someone like you especially in your arrogant attacking manner. You clearly seem to think you know it all. Keep on dissecting. It's workin for ya.




grin
------ This poll is Archived ------
Sep 30, 2010 7:37 AM CST DID WE REALLY HAVE TO GO TO WAR IN IRAQ?
aspen12
aspen12aspen12portage la prarie, Manitoba Canada28 Threads 16 Polls 528 Posts
Albertaghost: We had over a thousand troops and military personel aiding in the invasion.
Correct. WMDs were only the reasons the press emphasized though and, Iraq was bound to prove they had destroyed them, not for the UN to prove they had done so. In any case, the following are the reasons for the invasion;

""to get Iraq to comply with ceasefire terms
- to stop Iraq’s Inadvertence to UNSC resolutions
- to force Iraq to cease it’s violation of human rights
- to stop Iraq’s material breaches of UNSC resolutions
- to end Iraq’s WMD capability and aspirations
- to end repression of Iraq’s civilian population
- to force Iraq to return or cooperate in accounting for Kuwaiti and third country nationals
- to force Iraq to return Kuwaiti property wrongfully seized by Iraq,
- to end Iraqi Support for terrorism
- to show America has the will to help allies and destroy foes
- to depose a regional threat take in Saddam that would have to be dealt with sooner or later
- to force action from SA to take care of it's radicals
- to pressure other regimes in the area not to provide passive or active support to Jihadists
- to position US troops in the region in force to enable that pressure
- to aid their global and NATO mission by placing a Strategic Air Support base
- to support and help create an Arab democracy as an example to others""
Member states already had the approval as per UNSC Res 1441 of November 2002.
Less than twenty thousand died in the military action. Saddam killed more than that amount every month in his day to day administration of his gulag.
SAY







SAYS UNCLE ALBERT GULAG






YOU MUST BE GOVERMENT YOU BLA BLA SO MUCH




rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing rolling on the floor laughing laugh laugh laugh
------ This poll is Archived ------

This Poll is Archived

This Poll is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Poll get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
Message #318

Stats for this Poll

73 Votes
1,723 Views
89 Comments
by aspen12 (16 Polls)
Created: Sep 2010
Last Viewed: just now
Last Commented: Oct 2010
Last Voted: Jul 2017

Share this Poll

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here