RE: Just got done voting

This is true CC, yet, how do you know they are not?
I do a lot of research before I state about any thing, or I state that that is my feelings.
However, The first video has been all over the news for a few weeks now. I am surprised it is coming out at this time. In my feelings, it is the truth. In my research, it is, and has been stated.

RE: Just got done voting

I have no idea Linds.
In watching the news, I did see a couple of places in the country concerning the machines, where the republican vote switched to a democratic vote.
It is stated that the machines were repaired? I would like to know why the vote went democratic other than republican?? As stated??.
You know as well as I do that I find it all hard to trust.

RE: Just got done voting

My experience at the Polls.
So, I have my card that says to present to the polling station. So I felt comfortable.
My name is on the list, "that's a good thing".
But the list shows that I requested a mail in Ballot? "I did not request, nor did I receive a mail in ballot"?
So, I am given a Provisional Voter Ballot. "I am feeling uncomfortable at this point".
The women behind the tables tell me that I have nothing to worry about. I am told that it is a way preventing me from voting twice? "Why would I vote twice and take the chance of procession"?
Be that as it may, my ballot is to be opened tomorrow morning to be counted. I can see if my ballot is counted 35 days after the election via website.
What I did not see, was how many mail in ballots were on the list. I did see quite a few. But I have no clue as to the affiliation.
So, did I vote in this election? I think that is any bodies guess.
Welcome to the polls!
The only positive thing I see is that I filled out a paper ballot. However the handling of it is in discretion. And my name is all over the envelope.

RE: Just got done voting

I will state here and now.
If Clinton gets in office, the Unites States will be hit so hard, they wont understand what happened to them.

RE: Just got done voting

I think you worded that the wrong way Linds.
Coneys and their Obama is more like the truth.

RE: Just got done voting

Take a look at these agreements that have been created. The EU for example.
In the agreement, the EU dictates the immigration policies to the countries involved.
What a mess.
Germany is crumbling right in front of our eyes. And the entire European union is right behind them.

RE: Just got done voting

Yes Linds. That was just as what I figured he would promote. Notice the well chosen words. It was a programed set up. No doubt about it.

RE: Just got done voting

I am headed out to vote in a few minuets. Skimming the news this morning, I come across a video of Clinton stumbling again last evening.
Well, well will see if the pollsters are correct this evening?

RE: Three Against The World?

Well. My computer is super slow today!
Found it.
Duterte wanted to purchase guns for the police. The US backed out of the deal. "Interesting".
Then I find that George Sorris is connected. "I should have guessed". He wants to funnel thousands of Muslims into the country.
Russia and China have not only offered guns, but ships and planes also.
"Pretty interesting"!

RE: Three Against The World?

All I can say Linds. Is that whom ever wins, they will both be power houses. An almost equal share of the constituency!
In power, one always has to keep that in mind.
The reshaping of the houses may be all we get. I hope it turns in the people favor.

RE: Is talking about our dead members of this blog land a deface in their memory?

Well, I only skimmed this blog. I hope the air has some what cleared??
You are a power house Linds. Your blogs make people think. At the least, they make me think.
Fear not. I will always hold you dear.

RE: Three Against The World?

The government has been playing this game a long time String. The generations before me are just as at fault.
Talk with some of the older generations and they will tell you that the government never lies.
There is an old adage. "If it happens in the government, it is well thought out"!

RE: Three Against The World?

Yes, I saw that z. I am sure he is under a whole lot of pressure.
I remember a computer game. It was all about counties, and cities mainly.
One would propose tax rates, then build infrastructure, etc. Fun game. The winner was the most prosperous area.
Our government plays the same game.

RE: Three Against The World?

And people wonder what laws get enacted when they are distracted by a scandal. An unbelievable amount of legislation gets shoved through during those times.
Often I feel that the scandals are contrived.
I keep asking myself, OK, what are they passing now???

RE: Three Against The World?

I came across that when researching double voting. Seems that a Linds Jones from Califorina may be rejected by a Lind Jones from Mississippi. Thus assuming that they are both the same person.
The disqualifications ran into the millions. But with a good computer program, it was found to be a very minor occurrence.
Yet many were and still are disqualified, And no reason is given.

RE: Three Against The World?

I am in total agreement with you on that Linds. However every one is allowed to vote if they show up at the polls.
And if any one tries to intimidate or to run them off, they become labile for Federal Procession.
Where the real problem lies, is if the vote gets counted.

RE: Three Against The World?

Thus, if a candidate gets elected that uses false procedures, and the out come gets contested, the best bet is to make your opponent secretary of state! LOL

RE: Three Against The World?

In a way it is true Linds. Every one can vote. If you are not on the polling rolls, you are given a proxie ballet.
Now the counting of that ballet is based upon and at the voting site.
The process is a little foggy, however, the vote can be counted, or it can be rejected.
Those are the facts.

RE: Three Against The World?

I had a hard time getting into Z's post also on line. I have seen this type of computer behavior before.
Did I ever mention that??? LOL

RE: Three Against The World?

I think there is a lot of blocking going on right now Linds. Wikilinks has not sold out., to my knowledge.

RE: Three Against The World?

It looks as though Google is blocking or redirecting.

RE: Three Against The World?

Good morning Linds. Get off of Google and type in: Wikilinks confirms Hillery sold guns to ISIS.
An array of information comes up.

RE: America's future with a liar

Wikilinks confirms Hillery sold weapons to ISIS. Political Insider.
I am not making this up. Look it up your selves. The transcripts are all there.

RE: America's future with a liar

Of course, one has to get away from Google to find it.
I tested it on Trump. I found nothing.

RE: America's future with a liar

I found a pretty good site. wiki links investigation into the clinton's, nov. 6 2016

RE: Three Against The World?

I agree with you Linds, about the way people feel about the control they are under.
But at the same time, how I feel about the policies of Russia and China, I have to admit, I am happy for their strength against the Globalist order.

RE: Three Against The World?

Say Ped. Can you dance like James Brown.
I have been watching your country. I can see that you are not very far behind us as a nation.
Perhaps you would like to dance right into the mess.
I really feel as though I am fighting for my way of life here. For the policies of my country. For the benefit of the globe.
Today is the 6th. Two more days. I am really scared.

RE: Three Against The World?

I admit Phyllis. I am not that intelligent as to what is happening out side the United States? Also I have to state that I do not know why any country would move away from a Democratic way of thinking?
All I have that I observe, is that the people love us as a people, but the governments seem to always be in turmoil?
What this country has done, diplomatically with other countries since the Bush regime, well really since the assassination of Kennedy I do not know.
What I do view, is the turn out of Vietnam. Egypt, Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait, Columbia, Iran, and now Syria.
What a line if destruction we have left in our wake.
Country after country are turning away from our policies.
I do not know the answer? But I do surmise,a lot of it has to do with our money system. And how the use of it controls.
The ITTP trade agreement is, "in one way needed", is so shaped as to limit sovereignty and place control of countries into the control of international corporations. And who owns the corporations?
I can understand the fear of countries that have been faced with that opportunity.
Wiki links.
This house of ours really needs a clean up. A restructuring.
If Hillery gets into office, I do not see any changes in our policies. As a matter of fact, I see more countries turning away from us.
Look at Venezuela. Look at Sweden. Both different scenarios yet both in trouble over our policies.
I do not have an answer????

RE: Three Against The World?

Well, What struck me the most was when the banking came up in it. That drove my mind back to the global agenda. The money system.
And the fact as you mentioned that the US is not able to preform to their agreements because of being bogged down so much in the middle east.
Our promoted intentions may be there, however, our abilities may be limited.

RE: Three Against The World?

OK Linds, I read that one. I did not get a whole lot out of it, until I read this one.
Evaluating the re balance to Asia. By Stapleton Roy, found in The Dipolmat

This is a list of blog comments created by cheavy.

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here