The government seems to know everything about everything except when its convenient to know nothing about anything while hiding behind Plausible Deniability
what i know just in common sense alone about 911 is that the government is lying through their teeth to cover their tracks over the 2.3 trillion that mysteriously disappeared days before 911 and was never discussed again, because all eyes were forced to focus on little brown manufactured terrorists that schooled at known CIA pilot schools, then without any resistance whatsoever took control of the skies over America thus unfolding events that ultimately killed thousand of people throughout the globe and caused the citizens of America to lose everything.....how convenient....I'd say that Binladen character and his little band of ragtag freedom fighters must have been trained by Sun Tsu himself, and were the greatest warriors of all times and should be placed in the annuls of history right up next to ALEXANDER THE GREAT
I bet the Chinese aren't that gullible...can you say who's your DADDY
Remember, on June 5, 2006, FBI spokesman, Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb said, “The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” This should be headline news worldwide. The challenge to the reader is to find out why it is not. Why has the U.S. media blindly read the government-provided 9/11 scripts, rather than investigate without passion, prejudice, or bias, the events of September 11, 2001? Why has the U.S. media blacklisted any guest that might speak of a government sponsored 9/11 cover-up, rather than seeking out those people who have something to say about 9/11 that is contrary to the government’s account? And on those few rare occasions when a 9/11 dissenter has made it upon the airways, why has the mainstream media ridiculed the guest as a conspiracy nut, rather than listen to the evidence that clearly raises valid questions about the government’s 9/11 account? Why is the Big Media Conglomeration blindly content with the government’s 9/11 story when so much verifiable information to the contrary is available with a few clicks of a computer mouse?
Who is it that is controlling the media message, and how is it that the U.S. media has indicted Usama Bin Laden for the events of September 11, 2001, but the U.S. government has not? How is it that the FBI has no “hard evidence” connecting Usama Bin Laden to the events of September 11, 2001, while the U.S. media has played the Bin Laden - 9/11 connection story for five years now as if it has conclusive evidence that Bin Laden is responsible for the collapse of the twin towers, the Pentagon attack, and the demise of United Flight 93?
…No hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11
Next is the Bin Laden “confession” video that was released by the U.S. government on December 13, 2001. Most Americans remember this video. It was the video showing Bin Laden with a few of his comrades recounting with delight the September 11 terrorist attacks against the United States. The Department of Defense issued a press release to accompany this video in which Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld said, “There was no doubt of bin Laden’s responsibility for the September 11 attacks before the tape was discovered.” What Rumsfeld implied by his statement was that Bin Laden was the known mastermind behind 9/11 even before the “confession video” and that the video simply served to confirm what the U.S. government already knew; that Bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.
In a BBC News article reporting on the “9/11 confession video” release, President Bush is said to have been hesitant to release the tape because he knew it would be a vivid reminder to many people of their loss. But, he also knew it would be “a devastating declaration” of Bin Laden’s guilt. “Were going to get him,” said President Bush. “Dead or alive, it doesn’t matter to me.”
In a CNN article regarding the Bin Laden tape, then New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said that “the tape removes any doubt that the U.S. military campaign targeting bin Laden and his associates is more than justified.” Senator Richard Shelby, R-Alabama, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee said, “The tape’s release is central to informing people in the outside world who don’t believe bin Laden was involved in the September 11 attacks.” Shelby went on to say “I don’t know how they can be in denial after they see this tape.” Well Senator Shelby, apparently the Federal Bureau of Investigation isn’t convinced by the taped confession, so why are you?
The Muckraker Report attempted to secure a reference to the U.S. government authenticating the Bin Laden “confession video”, to no avail. However, it is conclusive that the Bush Administration and U.S. Congress, along with the dead stream media, played the video as if it was authentic. So why doesn’t the FBI view the “confession video” as hard evidence? After all, if the FBI is investigating a crime such as drug trafficking, and it discovers a video of members of a drug cartel openly talking about a successful distribution operation in the United States, that video would be presented to a federal grand jury. The identified participants of the video would be indicted, and if captured, the video alone would serve as sufficient evidence to net a conviction in a federal court. So why is the Bin Laden “confession video” not carrying the same weight with the FBI?
he had several hundred million of his own money, lets put into perspective how much damage you could do to any country with just , lets say 5 million? now supposedly he pulled off 911 with just a little over $100,000
lets reconstruct this trade center building scenario, except instead of using an airplane lets detonate a 1 kiloton atom bomb 2 miles away at an altitude of 500 ft. chances are the only thing that would happen is all the glass would be blown out of the building and it would be severely scorched and possibly it might fall over...POSSIBLY?
it would not fall within its footprint to ground level ejecting all its core columns out from within its self
i well than made my point and any other point is moot in contrast to reality. it doesn't matter whether it may have never happened before and you know this. you are just trolling.
Have you ever set a stick of dynamite off tied to a string hanging from a tree limb? you would think that it would blow the limb off the tree or blow the tree apart, it wont, just makes a really loud boom and blows some leaves off.
now drill a hole in the tree and insert that same stick of dynamite and plug the hole and it will blow the tree in half. but only in that spot.
Ok, now consider the trade centers as really big trees that you tied a stick of dynamite to the tree and detonated. what you will find is although you had a sufficient amount of explosive, it was wasted because its energy was allowed to escape outside and not trapped within for compression to expand and blow apart the tree in that spot that the charge should have been placed within.
why the theory that the planes brought those buildings down cannot work is the way the building were engineered, they were built like a giant fly trap/screen, with massive interlocking individual panels on all 4 sides 1000 ft in the air with massive re-enforced steel and concrete core columns that were set deep withing the ground and foundations to ensure that any energy at any upper level would merely cause the buildings to sway away from any released energy/earthquake,hurricane,tornado,downdrafts,airplanes. it was engineered this way specifically. if all the core columns and outer meshes from where the plane hit were to have been sheared simultaneously, the only thing that might have occurred would have been #1 the upper section of the building would have settled on top its lower floor, or #2 the upper section of the building would have slid off in one piece and crashed to the ground "intact"
even if a detonation of the magnitude of all the fuel were to have occurred within the building, the result would have been primarily the same, the building wouldn't have disintegrated into pulverized dust and ejected all the interior core columns outside the structure to ground level...just cannot happen unless all the floors were released to allow a free fall affect as was witnessed by billions.
common sense and laws of physics dictate this
what are the odds of 3 building doing this within hour of each other, and one not ever even getting hit by an airplane.
take a look at the Oklahoma city bombing and you will get the picture of what real high explosive can do to a building "not contained within" and subsequently did not collapse
hey the Jews used to sneak into countries and kidnap people to take home and execute, sure why not. its not like they need to have any respect for any country in the world if they are going to conquer them anyway
besides they gotta pick on little brown people, cuz they aint got the balls to go after the people that can meet them on the battlefield with equal strength
Mystyr Forum Posts (496)
yet
RE: The Koran has a misprint.
Binladen was tired and the government graciously put him to sleep at a cost of 14 trillion dollars, that was very kind of them.sleep well