That's exactly what I ment, not all animals are made by nature to be "pets", and if someone really loves animals, he must respect this fact. I not only felt sorry about birds, but also about some other "pets" I've seen. And one last thing I would like to mention: Dogs have an extreme sense to know if you really love theme or not. And if you really love theme, you never have to pretend, or even to fear. This is my multiple experience I had, even with "wild" dogs".
But would you also accept a monkey dancing around in the house? I'm serious asking now, because I've seen that also, in Kenya. I ask, because if we Westerns talk about "pets", we usually think about doggies and cats.
No, I have no lamb anyway... But 2 times I've seen lambs living in appartments, as pets... in central Europe though... That's why I was reminded to it and made this remark joking, because in one case they eat it together, no reason to divorce or separate... As for me, I would never sacrifie a pet, but I also never had such an anormal girlfriend to ask me something like that...
That was a really nice statement to read for me! Who is the left and who is the right in FACT today? And which is the most beautiful color today? Blue or red or green?
1. No diplomatic immunity for frauds 2. No reelection for the same duty 3. No longer than 4-5 years in any duty, legislative or executive 4. Strengthen the legislative and the law to be more neutral 5. Forbid by law state deficit spending, except transitory posts of cause 6. State basic social dues by law, but let the states/communities to do that 7. Give maximal executive power to communities 8. Fight for a functional UN without veto rights, but with according cost split 9. Enforce the NATO to box decisions of UN through
10. Support international trade, but enforce country’s autonomy to a maximum, so the economic rule of comperative competition can be improved
I watched, also other news. I think there is only little hope for an effective riot, probably they'll put her again under house arrest. She knows, therefore she keeps speaking very diplomatic.
Well, I would have more time for my works. You know, once you get involved with forums in the internet, its hard to quit, it becomes an obsession like smoking.
Yes, the Euro implementation was basically a good idea, but it was rushed and relayed mainly on the interest of the economically strongest countries in the EE. And this interest was primarily a strong Euro, which is understandable. So the exchange-rate-value chosen for the other EE countries was totally wrong, not only in economic terms. And I appreciate for example Poland, beside some other countries in Europe, having also refused to participate to the Euro zone. As you said, the economy needs the "mass" to run, but if a big part of this mass cannot bye anymore cars, weapons, electronics etc. from the others, but instead became relatively expensive in all they had and still have to offer, what is all the game about? You know, the first 2 decades, they bought a hell of things, encouraged and also smearing the politicians to do so, just by increasing their national dept. And here we are now, we Greeks... Lastly, don't forget that this is not the first time Europe tries to implement a common currency: First try was under the Roman emperor Justinian, last one under Napoleon with the well known "Napoleoni".
Exact, this is also the only difference between the classical and new monetarism theory: "No boarders, no governments, no religions, no ethnics, no ethics, nothing”. Just come into the arena and let's fight "for free" now. The question is who is going to fight against whom? Beside of some ethic problems which occurred, about 2/3 of the countries have been robbed throughout centuries by Colonists and later by "bilateral agreements", straw men- grove’s, therefore absolute corruption, and today more and more by the IMF, the most important doggy for the globalisation-"brake through", having first undermined even the role of the Fed.
But the tragic thing is that USA itself became the first victim, after Reagan/Bush senior took over, implementing the Chicago school theory of the “new monetarism”. It was the 2nd try in the USA politic scene though, and not the first one, but only than they succeeded. That’s why I always start counting from 1981 forwards, when referring to such matters, means when Senior Bush became R. Reagan’s vice president.
I hope she will rather stay and fight if she still has such a big support. The reunion with her mother is an easy game if she succeed, comparing with what she could offer to the nation.
RE: who would like to marry me?
equiya: no, the QUOTE buttonNow you got it! Keep on going tanxia, it's a great thread!