Who has more Rights? ( Archived) (63)

May 31, 2009 12:51 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
Of all the political parties out there, which one of the parties gives their people more rights?
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:11 PM CST Who has more Rights?
sambhava
sambhavasambhavaVasteras, Vastmanland Sweden3 Threads 1 Polls 584 Posts
More rights to do WHAT...?
In response to: Of all the political parties out there, which one of the parties gives their people more rights?
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:26 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
sambhava: More rights to do WHAT...?


Right to do for whatever rights are given to them by their political party.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:38 PM CST Who has more Rights?
The_Kansan
The_KansanThe_KansanKnoxville, Tennessee USA303 Threads 1 Polls 3,395 Posts
JasperCrush: Right to do for whatever rights are given to them by their political party.


It's my experience that our rights were not "given to us by our political party," but guaranteed by the Constitution.

If you want to know which political party is doing it's best to see that those rights are preserved, then I'd respectfully suggest that you take a look at which party has consistently tried to pass laws which infringe upon those rights. (And then choose the other one...)


cowboy
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:49 PM CST Who has more Rights?
RobertC2
RobertC2RobertC2Xaghra, Gozo, Gozo Malta91 Threads 8 Polls 8,344 Posts
I should think that if you chose all the political parties on the planet then it has to be the now almost defunct 'Monster Raving Looney Party' led by the now deceased Lord Screaming Such (or was it 'Screaming Lord Such') of Great Britain.......... the party actually had quite a sensible policy stand on most issues of the day, but stood as a 'protest' party against the main stream parties of British politics.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:57 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
The_Kansan: It's my experience that our rights were not "given to us by our political party," but guaranteed by the Constitution.

If you want to know which political party is doing it's best to see that those rights are preserved, then I'd respectfully suggest that you take a look at which party has consistently tried to pass laws which infringe upon those rights. (And then choose the other one...)


This is my point. Why are there any rights? As long as we do not infringe upon another person or their property everything should be inherently legal. To place it on paper gives the assumption that it can be taken away.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 1:59 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
RobertC2: I should think that if you chose all the political parties on the planet then it has to be the now almost defunct 'Monster Raving Looney Party' led by the now deceased Lord Screaming Such (or was it 'Screaming Lord Such') of Great Britain.......... the party actually had quite a sensible policy stand on most issues of the day, but stood as a 'protest' party against the main stream parties of British politics.


Such a party is truly needed in the US and Canada.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:00 PM CST Who has more Rights?
The source of man’s rights is not divine law or congressional law, but the law of identity. A is A—and Man is Man. Rights are conditions of existence required by man’s nature for his proper survival. If man is to live on earth, it is right for him to use his mind, it is right to act on his own free judgment, it is right to work for his values and to keep the product of his work. If life on earth is his purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being: nature forbids him the irrational. Any group, any gang, any nation that attempts to negate man’s rights, is wrong, which means: is evil, which means: is anti-life.

Ayn Rand "Galt's Speech"




We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Part of "Declaration of Independence"


It matters little whether by a Creator or Nature,the Main thing is ,Those Rights belong to Man,the Individual,they are not a "Gift" by some Tribal Chief,or ANY other Governing Body!professor
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:07 PM CST Who has more Rights?
druidess6308
druidess6308druidess6308Aliquippa, Pennsylvania USA79 Threads 13,695 Posts
JasperCrush: This is my point. Why are there any rights? As long as we do not infringe upon another person or their property everything should be inherently legal. To place it on paper gives the assumption that it can be taken away.
Our government can take them away. If you don't believe that, look at Cuba. They were put on paper to make sure we did have them, and to give us something to believe in and preserve. Sadly, too many Americans have been sleepwalking in trust and we've already lost many of them, and made the rest too easy to take away now.

"When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.
When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.
Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet."
– Lyle Myhr

Honestly, both major parties in this country have too much power and too little care for our rights. We need a strong candidate for the Libertarian or some other party.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:08 PM CST Who has more Rights?
druidess6308
druidess6308druidess6308Aliquippa, Pennsylvania USA79 Threads 13,695 Posts
Conrad73: The source of man’s rights is not divine law or congressional law, but the law of identity. A is A—and Man is Man. Rights are conditions of existence required by man’s nature for his proper survival. If man is to live on earth, it is right for him to use his mind, it is right to act on his own free judgment, it is right to work for his values and to keep the product of his work. If life on earth is his purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being: nature forbids him the irrational. Any group, any gang, any nation that attempts to negate man’s rights, is wrong, which means: is evil, which means: is anti-life.

Ayn Rand "Galt's Speech"




We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Part of "Declaration of Independence"


It matters little whether by a Creator or Nature,the Main thing is ,Those Rights belong to Man,the Individual,they are not a "Gift" by some Tribal Chief,or ANY other Governing Body!
thumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:09 PM CST Who has more Rights?
Indyfella
IndyfellaIndyfellaindianapolis, Indiana USA152 Threads 8 Polls 18,150 Posts
Conrad73: The source of man’s rights is not divine law or congressional law, but the law of identity. A is A—and Man is Man. Rights are conditions of existence required by man’s nature for his proper survival. If man is to live on earth, it is right for him to use his mind, it is right to act on his own free judgment, it is right to work for his values and to keep the product of his work. If life on earth is his purpose, he has a right to live as a rational being: nature forbids him the irrational. Any group, any gang, any nation that attempts to negate man’s rights, is wrong, which means: is evil, which means: is anti-life.

Ayn Rand "Galt's Speech"




We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

Part of "Declaration of Independence"


It matters little whether by a Creator or Nature,the Main thing is ,Those Rights belong to Man,the Individual,they are not a "Gift" by some Tribal Chief,or ANY other Governing Body!



Amenangel
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:10 PM CST Who has more Rights?
Indyfella
IndyfellaIndyfellaindianapolis, Indiana USA152 Threads 8 Polls 18,150 Posts
druidess6308: Our government can take them away. If you don't believe that, look at Cuba. They were put on paper to make sure we did have them, and to give us something to believe in and preserve. Sadly, too many Americans have been sleepwalking in trust and we've already lost many of them, and made the rest too easy to take away now.

"When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.
When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.
When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.
Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet."
– Lyle Myhr

Honestly, both major parties in this country have too much power and too little care for our rights. We need a strong candidate for the Libertarian or some other party.


Wayne Root is on Glenn beck at the moment (Fox) He'll be the libertarian candidate in 12. He's not a goofball either. I'd like to see him succeed. yay
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:53 PM CST Who has more Rights?
druidess6308
druidess6308druidess6308Aliquippa, Pennsylvania USA79 Threads 13,695 Posts
Indyfella: Wayne Root is on Glenn beck at the moment (Fox) He'll be the libertarian candidate in 12. He's not a goofball either. I'd like to see him succeed.


Indy, the only problem with that is that the one joint action the Democratic and Republican parties have had is to make it nearly impossible for a candidate from another party to have any chance. They did that after Nader almost had a chance. Now the other candidates have to have 10 times as many signatures (literally) to get on the ticket, and there are other steps they've taken to shut them out.

If we really want change in this country, enough people are going to really have to fight for it. I hope enough of us truly want it bad enough. wine
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 2:56 PM CST Who has more Rights?
Indyfella
IndyfellaIndyfellaindianapolis, Indiana USA152 Threads 8 Polls 18,150 Posts
druidess6308: Indy, the only problem with that is that the one joint action the Democratic and Republican parties have had is to make it nearly impossible for a candidate from another party to have any chance. They did that after Nader almost had a chance. Now the other candidates have to have 10 times as many signatures (literally) to get on the ticket, and there are other steps they've taken to shut them out.

If we really want change in this country, enough people are going to really have to fight for it. I hope enough of us truly want it bad enough.



A change would do us good. (not the obama type change either) moping
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 3:52 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
This is why I live where I live and live how I live. We follow the laws of nature and help each other out when help is needed. We do not infringe upon the next man or his property. Government? who needs it?
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 3:53 PM CST Who has more Rights?
druidess6308
druidess6308druidess6308Aliquippa, Pennsylvania USA79 Threads 13,695 Posts
Indyfella: A change would do us good. (not the obama type change either)
I hear you, Indy. You know we're on the same page with this one. cheers
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 3:54 PM CST Who has more Rights?
druidess6308
druidess6308druidess6308Aliquippa, Pennsylvania USA79 Threads 13,695 Posts
JasperCrush: This is why I live where I live and live how I live. We follow the laws of nature and help each other out when help is needed. We do not infringe upon the next man or his property. Government? who needs it?
Wyoming, huh? hmmm
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 3:56 PM CST Who has more Rights?
JasperCrush
JasperCrushJasperCrushNowhere, Wyoming USA3 Threads 113 Posts
druidess6308: Wyoming, huh?


It surely is heaven on earth. Well, as long as you put in a hard days work.
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 4:09 PM CST Who has more Rights?
Tater
TaterTaterspringfield, Illinois USA45 Threads 3 Polls 3,326 Posts
The_Kansan: It's my experience that our rights were not "given to us by our political party," but guaranteed by the Constitution.

If you want to know which political party is doing it's best to see that those rights are preserved, then I'd respectfully suggest that you take a look at which party has consistently tried to pass laws which infringe upon those rights. (And then choose the other one...)
thumbs up
------ This thread is Archived ------
May 31, 2009 4:15 PM CST Who has more Rights?
The_Kansan
The_KansanThe_KansanKnoxville, Tennessee USA303 Threads 1 Polls 3,395 Posts
JasperCrush: Just like cattle, you just need to know when some need to be culled from the herd. Our government, seems to think there is no such thing a cull. It explains why we have such an inferior herd.


cheers (After work!) handshake
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Stats for this Thread

1,644 Views
62 Comments
by JasperCrush (3 Threads)
Created: May 2009
Last Viewed: 16 hrs ago
Last Commented: Jun 2009

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here