Taliban or US intelligence -Who is responsible ? ( Archived) (191)

clara1956: Dear Sir,

Expressing a different view from yours is not spreading Bile. What may be true for you is your personal interpretation of the world in light of your experiences and circumstances. You are entitled to everybody`s respect of your views as long as they are expressed in civilized terms. But, the same as you have your own conceptualization of the world and of events, other people, somewhere else, having different experiences and circumstances, will necessarily interpret the world in another light.

There`s nothing wrong with having different views. And it is good for all of us to remember that there is more than just one or two continents, and that each of us has a tiny part of Truth.

Have a good day.

Tulefel: I had the same impression at that time: a traditional enemy disappeared, and necessity to get a new one became urgent. So Taliban was a very convenient choice, though terrorism existed even before that, just no one cared much about it as long as there was USSR.

You can’t keep tax payers in line when there’s nothing to scare them with, can you?

BebeII: Yeah, with N.Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, Russia, etc., we JUST HAD TO LOOK for enemies didn't we? The Taliban wasn't convenient-they were harboring Bin Laden.

BebeII: Yeah, with N.Korea, China, Iran, Iraq, Russia, etc., we JUST HAD TO LOOK for enemies didn't we? The Taliban wasn't convenient-they were harboring Bin Laden.

jetdevil2001: for USA any enemy is convenient with a proper pretext. Rember the reason for starting war in Vietnam, war in the Bay of Pigs, Grenada, Panama, Iraq at last, though after invasion of Iraq your government admited that it was a total mistake, the mistake numbering thousands of lifes.

jvaski: I'm in agreement with him if he meant that the US shouldn't stand alone as the world's policeman ....

norslyman: WRONG

US has a long history of doing this. AllCIAduh works for CIA. How infiltrated is the Taliban I wonder?

Actually, Poppy production went down under Taliban rule. So not a CIA trademark. They are probably just the patsy here.

---

After the murder of Slobo Milosevic prevented the true Butchers of Serbia, Wes Clark and Bill Clinton, from being brought to justice, on the very first day of Saddam Hussein's testimony the judge turned off his microphone and ordered all media to leave following Saddam's comments that the civil war in Iraq is being deliberately fueled by the US.

Over the past few weeks we have highlighted Israeli and US foreign policy documents that actually encourage not deter the break out of civil war in Iraq. Decades old blueprints document how inter-Arab conflict would be beneficial to the Neo-Cons, initiating ethnic cleansing in Iraq and drawing in Iran and Syria to provide a pretext to expand the war.

Several highly suspicious events over the past year, such as the Samarra Mosque bombing and the staged SAS attack on Iraqi police, have brought this eventuality closer.

High profile trials like those of Milosevic and Hussein often backfire because top level criminality on the part of the US government and its international henchmen NATO and the UN is always exposed by the defendant.

The Hague were losing the case against Milosevic because he provided documented evidence of US government support of Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden in the late 1990's and was about to call Bill Clinton as a witness.
Similarly, Saddam's defense consists of he fact that the chemical and biological weapons allegedly used to poison residents of Halabja in March 1988 were sold to him by the US government and specifically Donald Rumsfeld.

Today, Hussein fingered the hidden hand behind the staged bombings in Iraq and his microphone was immediately shut off by the judge. From the AP,

jvaski: What Pack Mentality ? Some of us really like our country , and will not take crap thrown at us .........