More proof coming out that 911 was an inside job (91)
The moonbats are out early today.... 
------ This thread is Archived ------
StephanieH: From all versions presented bout 9/11 the official released one is the most ridiculous. That's a true conspiracy theory. It's conspiracy and it's theory because nothing there can match with what was seen, scientific evidences and post analysis.
The Official version of 9/11 is an insult to any person who can do a little bit of research on the matter.
This said, I doubt that we will know the truth about what really happened there any time soon. What we do know for sure is what was last released, a scientific report that was delivered to American Congressman containing Factual Evidences that WTC buildings were brought down by Thermite devices planted in the building.
There is no excuse for any American or citizen of the World to not start to read and seek answers themselves and be thankful that you are not living in wonderland in total oblivion (even if to some people, ignorance is still bliss)
We've noticed...The Official version of 9/11 is an insult to any person who can do a little bit of research on the matter.
This said, I doubt that we will know the truth about what really happened there any time soon. What we do know for sure is what was last released, a scientific report that was delivered to American Congressman containing Factual Evidences that WTC buildings were brought down by Thermite devices planted in the building.
There is no excuse for any American or citizen of the World to not start to read and seek answers themselves and be thankful that you are not living in wonderland in total oblivion (even if to some people, ignorance is still bliss)
------ This thread is Archived ------
alexey8: The attacks on the 11th of September were not an inside job, there has been no valid proof to back this claim up. The only possibility of any type of conspiracy theory that could possibly be valid is that the Bush administration had enough knowledge to stop the attacks but failed to do so. But, even this is only a theory.
I think the biggest problem, is that most people want to believe that it was an inside job that the government planned the attacks or were involved. I think its hard for many Americans and even people from other countries to believe that a group of people that many people in the US and the world saw has backwards or not advanced were able to carry off such an attack. It showed that America was vulnerable and had weaknesses...so many people don't want to believe that or feel that...so they turn to alternative theories, like it being a government job. Now people can feel that the US was not vulnerable, but instead was tricked by a very clever and sneaky government.
But, so far all of these theories of set demolition charges, missiles, government involvement, and so on have been easily been proven wrong.
Thank you for your sanity.I think the biggest problem, is that most people want to believe that it was an inside job that the government planned the attacks or were involved. I think its hard for many Americans and even people from other countries to believe that a group of people that many people in the US and the world saw has backwards or not advanced were able to carry off such an attack. It showed that America was vulnerable and had weaknesses...so many people don't want to believe that or feel that...so they turn to alternative theories, like it being a government job. Now people can feel that the US was not vulnerable, but instead was tricked by a very clever and sneaky government.
But, so far all of these theories of set demolition charges, missiles, government involvement, and so on have been easily been proven wrong.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Conrad73: Your Hate is getting the better of your Intelligence!
I don't hate Jews( you may not believe it , but it is true), to me as a group( no every Jews) they are funny people who are very much obsessed with worldly things.
You probably have seen like many of us that when these Zionist thug attack Palestine children by high tech weapons , Palestine children throw stones to them and chanting “ Allah Akbar”( means God is the greatest) in reply. It is a very common scene in Israel – Palestine war which can be a lesson for all oppressor like Israel , they should know ,no matter how technically advanced or rich they are , God is above all and he is the greatest and only he is worthy of worship and deserved to be feared.
------ This thread is Archived ------
this is your brain on drugs.
------ This thread is Archived ------
mahoo: I don't hate Jews( you may not believe it , but it is true), to me as a group( no every Jews) they are funny people who are very much obsessed with worldly things.
You probably have seen like many of us that when these Zionist thug attack Palestine children by high tech weapons , Palestine children throw stones to them and chanting “ Allah Akbar”( means God is the greatest) in reply. It is a very common scene in Israel – Palestine war which can be a lesson for all oppressor like Israel , they should know ,no matter how technically advanced or rich they are , God is above all and he is the greatest and only he is worthy of worship and deserved to be feared.
Oh my,you could have fooled me!You probably have seen like many of us that when these Zionist thug attack Palestine children by high tech weapons , Palestine children throw stones to them and chanting “ Allah Akbar”( means God is the greatest) in reply. It is a very common scene in Israel – Palestine war which can be a lesson for all oppressor like Israel , they should know ,no matter how technically advanced or rich they are , God is above all and he is the greatest and only he is worthy of worship and deserved to be feared.
------ This thread is Archived ------
this topic should be called.proof if you smoke weed all day. you can think of all kinds of crap.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ukrainegary48: this topic should be called.proof if you smoke weed all day. you can think of all kinds of crap.
Well, I think you're being a bit harsh on those conspiracy-believers, Gary. I think it's possible that those who believe the Bush Administration conspiracy theory aren't stoners, but rather are exceptionally gullible, no?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ambrose2007: Well, I think you're being a bit harsh on those conspiracy-believers, Gary. I think it's possible that those who believe the Bush Administration conspiracy theory aren't stoners, but rather are exceptionally gullible, no?
well...if you choose to call them 'gullible', i would say, it would be a terrible injustice to their wisdom and judgement.
------ This thread is Archived ------
mnowsa: well...if you choose to call them 'gullible', i would say, it would be a terrible injustice to their wisdom and judgement.
At least I'm not calling them a bunch of potheads. I'm thinking they're as a group probably more into Miller Lite or something...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ambrose2007: At least I'm not calling them a bunch of potheads. I'm thinking they're as a group probably more into Miller Lite or something...
o crap....you said it ambrose! i didn't say it!
------ This thread is Archived ------
pastortim: Here is something worth reading and watch the video. It has some very interesting information leading back to some posing art students who were inside the Twin Towers and doing some very suspicious things,, well making platforms to do things on the sides of the twin towers, a book on explosive devices and they lived next to the four other attackers. Lots of money was put into their accounts and oh hey, guess what, they were Israeli intelligence officers. You got to check this out.
You decide. Inside job?
You decide. Inside job?
Can you say wag the tail?. Can you say none of the intelligence agents showed up for work that day? Can you say that an artist is going to tend to carry explosives?
Those buildings were not built to tolerances that they recieved.
Dennis
------ This thread is Archived ------
lorax888: Can you say wag the tail?. Can you say none of the intelligence agents showed up for work that day? Can you say that an artist is going to tend to carry explosives?
Those buildings were not built to tolerances that they recieved.
Dennis
Those buildings were not built to tolerances that they recieved.
Dennis
I'd hate to think those building fell because they were intolerant!
(And how, exactly, do you receive a tolerance?
)------ This thread is Archived ------
I'd hate to think those buildings fell because they were intolerant! (And how, exactly, do you receive a tolerance?)
------ This thread is Archived ------
i think people should read the PNAC(project for new american century) document with an objective mind and then try to connect the dots. In that document, the neoconservatives have boldly stated their objectives with regard to the world domination. the stated principles in that document are as follows:
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order.
Now, if you care to read this website link:http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf, you will see that their stated goals would never matarialize if there was no catastrophic event like a new peart harbor. please read page 63 in that document/link "“absent some catastrophic catalyzing event –like a new Pearl Harbor”.
So, would it be a terrible mistake if one is tempted to conclude that 9/11 could possibly an inside job?
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order.
Now, if you care to read this website link:http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf, you will see that their stated goals would never matarialize if there was no catastrophic event like a new peart harbor. please read page 63 in that document/link "“absent some catastrophic catalyzing event –like a new Pearl Harbor”.
So, would it be a terrible mistake if one is tempted to conclude that 9/11 could possibly an inside job?
------ This thread is Archived ------
***in other words, they needed another "pearl harbor" to implement the PNAC agenda. And 9/11 exactly gave them the "opportunity of the century". Was it an inside job? the answer is maybe/maybe not. Was the administration praying( as sickening as it may sound) for such catastrophic event. the answer is you bet they were.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Ambrose2007: Well, I think you're being a bit harsh on those conspiracy-believers, Gary. I think it's possible that those who believe the Bush Administration conspiracy theory aren't stoners, but rather are exceptionally gullible, no?
first off. you can ask anyone on here. i hate George w bush. but i,m one of the ones who thinks the government burn down that house in Waco Texas. and my hero is randy weaver. but not even i will everything that the government let over 300 thousand people die. if these people are not hi or drunk. he can you justify there insane thoughts.------ This thread is Archived ------
mnowsa: i think people should read the PNAC(project for new american century) document with an objective mind and then try to connect the dots. In that document, the neoconservatives have boldly stated their objectives with regard to the world domination. the stated principles in that document are as follows:
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order.Now, if you care to read this website link:http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf, you will see that their stated goals would never matarialize if there was no catastrophic event like a new peart harbor. please read page 63 in that document/link "“absent some catastrophic catalyzing event –like a new Pearl Harbor”.
So, would it be a terrible mistake if one is tempted to conclude that 9/11 could possibly an inside job?
1) Increase an already enormous military budget at the expense of domestic social programs
2) Toppling of regimes resistant to our corporate interests
3) Forcing democracy at the barrel of a gun in regions that have no history of the democratic process
4) Replacing the UN’s role of preserving and extending international order.Now, if you care to read this website link:http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf, you will see that their stated goals would never matarialize if there was no catastrophic event like a new peart harbor. please read page 63 in that document/link "“absent some catastrophic catalyzing event –like a new Pearl Harbor”.
So, would it be a terrible mistake if one is tempted to conclude that 9/11 could possibly an inside job?
Usually when someone talks about how great it would be if their spouse would have a mysterious and improbable tragic accident so we could, say, get their life insurance - and then the wife dies in a mysterious and improbable accident - the police show some interest in investigating the beneficiary who made the statement.
The police would presumably even be more interested in such an investigation if a vast number of bizarre coincidences and otherwise improbable events attended it.
If someone wrote a novel comprising all the absurd coincidences and clue-pointing events attending 9/11 and submitted it to an editor, the editor would say (among other things): "It's obvious from the beginning who the culprits are. Everything points to the Neocons/Bush Administration, and the flimsy distraction with the box-cutting Arabs is ridiculously transparent. You're going to both proofread the manuscript for logic and eliminate all the blatant clues that point to the neocons. Your narrative has to have some suspense and coherence after all."
------ This thread is Archived ------
ukrainegary48: first off. you can ask anyone on here. i hate George w bush. but i,m one of the ones who thinks the government burn down that house in Waco Texas. and my hero is randy weaver. but not even i will everything that the government let over 300 thousand people die. if these people are not hi or drunk. he can you justify there insane thoughts.
Three hundred thousand people die? Now I AM beginning to suspect you're a big bong-user after all!
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Common Issues with the BMW X1
How far is too far?
rarotonga
your personality
The Best of the GOP
Sleepy Don!
1830's Music
other can see but not you
Happy Birthday MysteriousGirl80
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Americans have got to stop looking for reds under the beds and actually stop being so gullible.