To Pay or not? (34)
I think it all depends on the situation. Very hard to answer without all the facts. But no it should not be automatic.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. If a woman can ask for it..then a man should as well.
------ This thread is Archived ------
nanners2863: Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. If a woman can ask for it..then a man should as well.
but should anyone really ask for it? What situation would negate such a request?
------ This thread is Archived ------
I don't think men or women should be entitled to receive alimony
after a divorce., and all assets acquired after the marriage was consummated should be split 50/50. The only ones that should be provided well for are the children. Unfortunately it doesn't always work that way and divorce judges and courts can be very biased and unfair.
after a divorce., and all assets acquired after the marriage was consummated should be split 50/50. The only ones that should be provided well for are the children. Unfortunately it doesn't always work that way and divorce judges and courts can be very biased and unfair.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Desertguy49: I don't think men or women should be entitled to receive alimony
after a divorce., and all assets acquired after the marriage was consummated should be split 50/50. The only ones that should be provided well for are the children. Unfortunately it doesn't always work that way and divorce judges and courts can be very biased and unfair.
after a divorce., and all assets acquired after the marriage was consummated should be split 50/50. The only ones that should be provided well for are the children. Unfortunately it doesn't always work that way and divorce judges and courts can be very biased and unfair.
Well, I think that for persons who were homemakers it would be fair but the allowance should stop once they are gainfully employed.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei: Well, I think that for persons who were homemakers it would be fair but the allowance should stop once they are gainfully employed.
A lot of people make money under the table after a divorce so to speak and don't report it. And some live off other people and use the poor ex's money for fun. I could go on and on on this subject, but prefer not too, all I can say is I've been there, done that and also seen a lot of other cases where people have been screwed over by divorce courts who don't even care about the reality of the situation or bother to investigate the allegations to find out the real truth, and to add to that Lawyers suck also, don't even get me started on them....
------ This thread is Archived ------
I dont think either party should get anything beyond child support to the parent the children reside with.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Desertguy49: A lot of people make money under the table after a divorce so to speak and don't report it. And some live off other people and use the poor ex's money for fun. I could go on and on on this subject, but prefer not too, all I can say is I've been there, done that and also seen a lot of other cases where people have been screwed over by divorce courts who don't even care about the reality of the situation or bother to investigate the allegations to find out the real truth, and to add to that Lawyers suck also, don't even get me started on them....
------ This thread is Archived ------
venusenvy: I dont think either party should get anything beyond child support to the parent the children reside with.
You are right ve, but community property should be divided equally and fairly.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Desertguy49: You are right ve, but community property should be divided equally and fairly.
divided evenly even if the other party found you with your property and in no way contributed to its maintainance
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei: If a wife earns more than her husband and there is a divorce, is it right for him to demand 'palimony'? What do you thinK?
Some husbands ask the courts to issue a ruling that makes it mandatory for the ex-wife to pay an allowance to them every month for the rest of their lives or until they remarry.
hell yes its right why not.Some husbands ask the courts to issue a ruling that makes it mandatory for the ex-wife to pay an allowance to them every month for the rest of their lives or until they remarry.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei: If a wife earns more than her husband and there is a divorce, is it right for him to demand 'palimony'? What do you thinK?
Some husbands ask the courts to issue a ruling that makes it mandatory for the ex-wife to pay an allowance to them every month for the rest of their lives or until they remarry.
hell yes its right why not.Some husbands ask the courts to issue a ruling that makes it mandatory for the ex-wife to pay an allowance to them every month for the rest of their lives or until they remarry.
------ This thread is Archived ------
nanners2863: Whats good for the goose is good for the gander. If a woman can ask for it..then a man should as well.
Indeed- If one deserves it, the other should deserve it in the same scenario.
The same cause could be made that neither of them deserve it.
At least they're both fair options.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Desertguy49: You are right ve, but community property should be divided equally and fairly.
I agree with that Desert, for sure, I just dont get the whole "alimony" thingy...Adults support thier own asses
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei: divided evenly even if the other party found you with your property and in no way contributed to its maintainance
It would depend how long they were together...6 months no years? yes
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei: divided evenly even if the other party found you with your property and in no way contributed to its maintainance
No, community property here is considered by law, any assets that are aquired after the marriage, and are supposed to be divided equally, for instance if we bought a house together after we were married, it could be bought out by one party or the other and 1/2 the market value at the time be paid to the one opting out or if an agreement cannot be reached then it should be put on the market for sale then the proceeds or equity would be divided 50/50, but it doesn't always seem to work that way. Also laws vary from state to state.
------ This thread is Archived ------
ermmm. we don't have divorce here. and i'm not familiar about rules on annulments. Either way, demands should go both ways. But i dont like divorce, and would avoid it if i can.
------ This thread is Archived ------
kekei:
To Pay or not?
To Pay or not?
To pay.
For child support
and
support for an ex-spouse who gave up their carrier/employment to be a homemaker. Until they are gainfully and securely employed.
Nothing beyond that.
------ This thread is Archived ------
venusenvy: I dont think either party should get anything beyond child support to the parent the children reside with.
I agree.
------ This thread is Archived ------
This Thread is Archived
This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.
« Go back to All Threads
« Go back to All Threads
More Threads
everything is changing
Icebergs Still Around
Common Issues with the BMW X1
1830's Music
Reality Check
How far is too far?
Don Shits-In-Pants!!!
Nature
Salami, Salami, Baloney
rarotonga
More Threads
Report threads that break rules, are offensive, or contain fighting. Staff may not be aware of the forum abuse, and cannot do anything about it unless you tell us about it. click to report forum abuse »
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
If one of the comments is offensive, please report the comment instead (there is a link in each comment to report it).
Stats for this Thread
1,185 Views
33 Comments
in CS Lounge
Created: Jun 2010
Last Viewed: Apr 19
Last Commented: Jun 2010
0 Likes
Some husbands ask the courts to issue a ruling that makes it mandatory for the ex-wife to pay an allowance to them every month for the rest of their lives or until they remarry.