Sad but true ( Archived) (93)

Jul 29, 2011 8:07 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
leigh2154: Big corporations currently face approximately 35%, one of the lowest tax rates in the WORLD!!...The tax "hit" is based on net income, not gross...This is one of the reasons you read about the HUGE bonus checks top CEO's receive....the bonus checks reduce the amount of "net" Corporate earnings by the same amount of taxes the Corps would owe if they did not pay out the bonuses....One of the primary reasons this little game ws started is because our government is frivolous with our tax dollars and people are sick and tired of it, have been for years!...So what exorbitant bonuses actually do is take money away from government and privatize it...Nothing more than a money game Blusey...


Essentially that is what i'm saying, you run yourself as a company; and say that company earns $100.000 in a year, you may pay yourself $15.000 of that in a wage and the remainder you recieve as an effective bonus, if you like.

It means that not one $ made recieves the top rate of income tax.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:08 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
TrueBlue1986: Essentially that is what i'm saying, you run yourself as a company; and say that company earns $100.000 in a year, you may pay yourself $15.000 of that in a wage and the remainder you recieve as an effective bonus, if you like.

It means that not one $ made recieves the top rate of income tax.


Receive**
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:08 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
TrueBlue1986: And I agree with you, I do actually pay all the tax I should be paying, and I do so because my Dad was a steelworker. But I notice it a lot amongst young professionals, we seriously resent how the super-rich behave, and how they're sapping the middle as well as screwing the bottom. The attitude of "if they can do it then so can we" is creeping in.
We need to close the loopholes....Take Jessie Jackson for an example .. Is he a Rev. and where is his church?.... does he preach and live by his religion ,or is it simply smoke and screens....does he file all of his income on his tax ..or does he claim it all or most or some as a non-profit org.


Most everyone cheats on their return in some form or another .....but that does not make it right..handshake



Here is a small paragragh I found on-line ans shows how one may "cheat" on their returns.


Though he began characterizing himself as a Baptist minister in 1968, Jackson had never actually earned a traditional ordination. He failed out of the Chicago Theological Seminary during his first year there. Kenneth Timmerman -- author of the authoritative book Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson -- explains: “[There is normally] a two- to three-year process for earning that title . Jesse Jackson got himself ordained two months after Martin Luther King was shot. It was essentially a political ordination, a shotgun ordination. ... He did not go through this two-year process. He never submitted himself to the authority of the church. He has never had a church himself, and he has been accountable to no one.


------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:21 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
venere08: an inzy point...I beg to differ. Cheat the government, and see how legal it will be regarded.
millions of people cheat the government every year...Just because some rich guy can find loopholes in the tax laws only means he found a "Legal" way to cheat....they know that is not how it is intended to work so even tho it is 'Legal" it is in fact still "cheating"
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:28 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
TrueBlue1986: Receive**
If you receive any money at all it is seen as "income" and therefore taxable....even waitress' are supposed to claim tips as income....
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:33 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
Also in a sense our government is trusting us to pay our 'fair" share of income tax ....funny how they trust us to play fair yet we trust them for nothing.


Like I always said ....a liar thinks everyone lies....a thief thinks everyone steals ....and a cheater thinks everyone cheats .....so in closing I am pretty sure most everyone cheats on their taxes in some form or another laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:34 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
grizzwald: We need to close the loopholes....Take Jessie Jackson for an example .. Is he a Rev. and where is his church?.... does he preach and live by his religion ,or is it simply smoke and screens....does he file all of his income on his tax ..or does he claim it all or most or some as a non-profit org.Most everyone cheats on their return in some form or another .....but that does not make it right..
Here is a small paragragh I found on-line ans shows how one may "cheat" on their returns.Though he began characterizing himself as a Baptist minister in 1968, Jackson had never actually earned a traditional ordination. He failed out of the Chicago Theological Seminary during his first year there. Kenneth Timmerman -- author of the authoritative book Shakedown: Exposing the Real Jesse Jackson -- explains: “[There is normally] a two- to three-year process for earning that title . Jesse Jackson got himself ordained two months after Martin Luther King was shot. It was essentially a political ordination, a shotgun ordination. ... He did not go through this two-year process. He never submitted himself to the authority of the church. He has never had a church himself, and he has been accountable to no one.http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=687


I agree, we should close the loopholes.

The greater problem though, as I see it, is that business is too closely tied to the international system of trade(the city). Which de facto holds no loyalty to any nation, it effectively plays nations against one another for corporate/individual gains.

If what was profitable in the West was factories and production, as opposed to banks and stocks, we could hold the business sector accountable to the community because we'd hold the means of production(the lifeblood of productive business)within the Nation, and so tax it fairly and ensure proper conduct.

In banking, you just can't do this, as we have seen. The banker will happily spin us all a lie, get fat in the mean time, then laugh at us when it all collapses, then they laugh even harder when we go crawling back to them like we are doing now. These vermin need stamping on.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:37 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
TrueBlue1986: I agree, we should close the loopholes.

The greater problem though, as I see it, is that business is too closely tied to the international system of trade(the city). Which de facto holds no loyalty to any nation, it effectively plays nations against one another for corporate/individual gains.

If what was profitable in the West was factories and production, as opposed to banks and stocks, we could hold the business sector accountable to the community because we'd hold the means of production(the lifeblood of productive business)within the Nation, and so tax it fairly and ensure proper conduct.

In banking, you just can't do this, as we have seen. The banker will happily spin us all a lie, get fat in the mean time, then laugh at us when it all collapses, then they laugh even harder when we go crawling back to them like we are doing now. These vermin need stamping on.
Ok this is getting a bit deeper than I am prepared to debate....I do know this....if you earn an income ...it is taxable...handshake
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:39 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
grizzwald: If you receive any money at all it is seen as "income" and therefore taxable....even waitress' are supposed to claim tips as income....


Oh it does get taxed, it's already been taxed through the business, but it is less than your personal income tax would of been.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:42 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
grizzwald: Ok this is getting a bit deeper than I am prepared to debate....I do know this....if you earn an income ...it is taxable...


Ok, mate. I've got a tendency for babbling. laugh
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:43 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986: Flat tax? The same % of income taxed for low and high wage earners?
Exactly!
Why punish someone,because they are better at earning Money than others?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:44 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
TrueBlue1986: Oh it does get taxed, it's already been taxed through the business, but it is less than your personal income tax would of been.
How are "tips" taxed though the business....it never reaches the cash drawer so therefore is NOT income for the business, it is however the waitress' income solely ,and her responsibility to pay the tax on this money....she provided a service and was paid for it in a form of cash payment so therefore SHE made the profit not the business.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:45 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald: Ok this is getting a bit deeper than I am prepared to debate....I do know this....if you earn an income ...it is taxable...
How about Double-Taxation?
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:46 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald
grizzwaldgrizzwaldalexandra bay, New York USA12 Threads 1,151 Posts
Conrad73: How about Double-Taxation?
an example of this please...so I can understand ..
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:50 AM CST Sad but true
outdoorgirlsun
outdoorgirlsunoutdoorgirlsunSapulpa, Oklahoma USA5 Threads 1,085 Posts
Uniquemom61: I don't expect any comments on this but just wanted to share with a bit of humor on how I feel about the whole OBAMA thing...

DEAR Barack, Last year I mismanaged my funds and this year my family and I cannot decide on a budget. Until we can come to a unified decision that fits all of our needs and interests, we will have to shut down our check book and will no longer be able to pay our taxes. I'm sure you'll understand. Thank you very much for setting an example we can all follow.


Here is what I wrote to my senators:

Dear Senator/congressmen,
Since you can't seem to agree on how to balance the budget (knowing it is hard, I've had to do it), I suggest, that since you are public servants, you work for free for a few months, no salary, no expense accounts, no gym and no healthcare and particularly no limos. You must use public transit, like most of us do. Now, if you happen to own your own car, feel free to drive that, but pay for your own gas. No free lunches or dinners from the lobbyists, you must buy your own groceries and cook your own food. Then, let's get together and talk about that budget thing.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:51 AM CST Sad but true
grizzwald: an example of this please...so I can understand ..
If you're an US-Citizen,and earn Money in another Country,like through Work,etc,you pay Income-taxes in that Country,then have to turn right around,and file and pay Income-Taxes in the US as well,even though you're not residing in the US!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:51 AM CST Sad but true
TrueBlue1986
TrueBlue1986TrueBlue1986Sale, South Manchester, Cheshire, England UK1,322 Posts
Conrad73: Exactly!
Why punish someone,because they are better at earning Money than others?


Some do say, it's better to give than receive. I don't think everybody begrudges paying tax when tax money goes to a good cause.

Aside from that, you'd have to lower all tax down to a percentage the poor could afford, and I don't see how you'd finance a modern state within such meagre means. Obviously, you being a Libertarian wouldn't mind this, but I think you'd have anarchy or revolution on your hands if this were to happen, especially when the private sector is performing so poorly, the scale of chaos could be unimaginable.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:52 AM CST Sad but true
leigh2154
leigh2154leigh2154Crossville, Tennessee USA5 Threads 6,408 Posts
TrueBlue1986: Flat tax? The same % of income taxed for low and high wage earners?


Well, sort of, but based on income level and number of dependents only for
households and based on gross rather than net for business...also, I think it should start at a certain level for people, not corps, say $25,000 before there is even a tax obligation...and I am not opposed to earned income credits for those families earning low income, those who work for a living and have children to support...
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:53 AM CST Sad but true
outdoorgirlsun: Here is what I wrote to my senators:

Dear Senator/congressmen,
Since you can't seem to agree on how to balance the budget (knowing it is hard, I've had to do it), I suggest, that since you are public servants, you work for free for a few months, no salary, no expense accounts, no gym and no healthcare and particularly no limos. You must use public transit, like most of us do. Now, if you happen to own your own car, feel free to drive that, but pay for your own gas. No free lunches or dinners from the lobbyists, you must buy your own groceries and cook your own food. Then, let's get together and talk about that budget thing.
You could form them into a Military Unit,and lock their Arses up on a Military Base,until they have hammered out an Agreement!
------ This thread is Archived ------
Jul 29, 2011 8:55 AM CST Sad but true
outdoorgirlsun
outdoorgirlsunoutdoorgirlsunSapulpa, Oklahoma USA5 Threads 1,085 Posts
grizzwald: How are "tips" taxed though the business....it never reaches the cash drawer so therefore is NOT income for the business, it is however the waitress' income solely ,and her responsibility to pay the tax on this money....she provided a service and was paid for it in a form of cash payment so therefore SHE made the profit not the business.


If you work in an industry where most of your money is in tips. They take 20% of waiter/waitress's intake for the nite, whether they make that or not. Where I live anyway.
------ This thread is Archived ------
Post Comment - Post a comment on this Forum Thread

This Thread is Archived

This Thread is archived, so you will no longer be able to post to it. Threads get archived automatically when they are older than 3 months.

« Go back to All Threads
Message #318

Share this Thread

We use cookies to ensure that you have the best experience possible on our website. Read Our Privacy Policy Here