Anti-Feminism; The Radical Notion That Feminists are Insane (494)

Theres a big problem in the schools and it is affecting males,theres to many of the one gender in the teaching profession






A key reason why boys lag behind in the classroom is revealed for the first time today – female teachers.

Ground-breaking research shows that boys lower their sights if they think their work is going to be marked by a woman because they believe their results will be worse.

It also shows their suspicions are correct – female teachers did, on average, award lower marks to boys than unidentified external examiners. Male teachers, by contrast, awarded them higher marks than external examiners.

The findings, published by the Centre for Economic Performance today, could have immense repercussions for boys because of the dearth of male teachers in the profession. Only 15 per cent of primary school staff are men.

The findings were yesterday described as "fascinating" by one of the country's leading academic researchers, Professor Alan Smithers, of the Centre for Education and Employment at the University of Buckingham.

He said the research, carried out among 1,200 children in 29 schools across the country, had shown a possible reason for the glaring gap in performance between girls and boys right through schooling.

It also revealed that girls tried harder if they had a male teacher because they believed they would get better marks. Their suspicions were not borne out, though, as the male teachers tended to give them exactly the same marks as the external examiners.

The study showed boys believed their answers would be 3 per cent lower if marked by a woman. The girls thought their results would be 6 per cent higher if marked by a man.

Professor Smithers said: "It is fascinating research. It does stress the im

Half the US Marine women in boot camp can't do 3 pull ups !!!




Are they going to be thrown out? No, the requirement is being abolised for women.

I guess they will also have to do away with the requirement to scale walls or carry equipment in combat, for women. Same wages though? Of course - that's 'equality for women'.

Talk about putting a certain gender in the wrong position, what if a war starts as it most likley will sometime soon, it's not uncommon for soldiers to march 30 miles a day with a serious weight on their backs and with every foot they take is a step into danger then arriving into a war zone they can say good bye to sleep for a few weeks and then under fear of death all these things would wear any male down and then after a period of time of this serious strain the gender in question will need special help to keep up to the males so in the end the men will have to help them and the fighting capabilities of the units will go down. its a social experiment and its already failing.

I guess they'll just have to conscript all the Feminists to show how women can do any job a man can do. If it were up to me I'd have only female combat troops. Rad fems first!

Put the butch masculine feminists in the front lines first let them lead by example but thats never going to happen they will never come out of those cosy offices and place themselves in danger.On to another topic in relation to an all female teacher system in place in this country with more young males being feminised I am going to put this question to some of the femmes on this site,,,,,,,, where is the gender equality in schools ie to many female teacher and where is the gender equality on the council ie working on the roads???

Do you think I generated memories?
for years I was convinced I moved to Donegal in 89 when in actual fact it was 86.

As I said the mind is the most amazing tool we own.

Don't mind him Annie, he's the craziest rooster in this coop